Scan barcode
duparker's review
4.0
I have read Mr. Malamud's The Natural, and The Assistant, so I was attracted to this book right off the bat. It is a very different construct then the other books. In this book, Malamud writes about a dystopian future, where a Second Flood has occurred after a nuclear war. Not what I was expecting. Unlike the other books I have read by Malamud, there is a heavy presence of God and Judaism here as well. Overall, it is a great book.
The story is well told, the pace is quick and the writing is excellent. I like the main character - the only human who survives the Flood, Cohen, and while you question some of his actions and ideas, you can relate to why he chooses the paths he does. The interactions with animals and the Planet of the Apes allegories are well thought out and executed.
The story is well told, the pace is quick and the writing is excellent. I like the main character - the only human who survives the Flood, Cohen, and while you question some of his actions and ideas, you can relate to why he chooses the paths he does. The interactions with animals and the Planet of the Apes allegories are well thought out and executed.
kateraed's review against another edition
3.0
A good read overall, from both religious and evolutionary standpoints - Malamud interestingly reconciles the two while questioning God's will. His style is very minimalistic, which in the first chapter of the Day of Devestation (or so Cohn, the protagonist, refers to the Flood with which man destroys himself) is engaging. The contrast of such a simple style with the havoc around Cohn allows the imagination to expand and fill in the gaps, the loneliness and isolation, more than any words ever could. However, the minimalist style soon becomes weary and it's hard to get through some parts of the story because of it - the reader really needs to rely on himself.
Overall, I enjoyed it, but I can't say I would recommend it to most people unless they were unusually interested in the God vs evolution question or Judaism in literature.
Overall, I enjoyed it, but I can't say I would recommend it to most people unless they were unusually interested in the God vs evolution question or Judaism in literature.
blackoxford's review against another edition
3.0
Starting From Scratch(ing)
“There is no Man without his Other.” This aphorism of the American philosopher Edgar A. Singer could be the theme (or running joke) of Bernard Malamud’s last novel. Malamud’s technique involves setting up a series of problematic situations in what is essentially a new Genesis as, effectively, a test of Singer’s maxim.
Adonai, HaShem, the Lord, the Creator allows mankind to annihilate itself in a brief but comprehensively decisive nuclear war. The divine intention was the entire eradication of mankind and all other animal life. But divine attention to detail was not all it should have been. Because he is in a deep submersible somewhere under the Pacific Ocean, the interestingly named Calvin Cohn, former rabbinical student turned scientist, son and grandson of a rabbi, accidentally survives.
This unauthorised Noah pleads for life with HaShem who is unsympathetic but fails to take further immediate action except to allow Calvin to drift to a tropical island. This divine indecisiveness produces yet another worry: “On good days Cohn told himself stories, saying the Lord would let him live if he spoke the right words. Or lived the right life. But how was that possible without another human life around?” Thus endeth the first day with the first question.
Turns out there is Another. But it’s a chimpanzee, a rather talented chimpanzee to be sure, but still and all an ape. Can a human-chimp duo constitute a life for either? Particularly if the chimp has been brought up Christian and the man a pious Jew. Can such a mixed family survive the strain of such cultural diversity? There are of course limits to inter-species communication, certainly physical, probably emotional and possibly mental. Nonetheless communication does take place. Is it enough for either party? Thus endeth the second day.
But just as the reader expects a linguistic breakthrough twixt man and beast, his mind is boggled by HaShem’s sense of humour in his operation of the devastated world. The Creator/Destroyer (blessed be his name) has also ‘forgotten’ to destroy a 500 lb. gorilla (the only authentic cliché, I think, in the book). The gorilla has an ear for devotional Yiddish music and so is attracted to the cosy island cave of chimp and man. Three is an awkward problem of course: the perpetual threat of jealousy, or two against one for starters. Does this new social melange inhibit meaningful bonding? Thus endeth day three.
So Buz the chimp, and George the gorilla, and Calvin the human settle down and try to find a social equilibrium. But, another surprise: before the nuclear oven, Buz’s scientist-keeper had fit him up with an artificial larynx. He can talk, with a heavy German accent and a limited vocabulary and no capacity for metaphor, but certainly sufficient to disturb the silence over the breakfast table. Trouble is, the table-talk is, if not intentionally anti-Semitic, then certainly biased toward the New Testament. And yet another, more fundamental problem pops up: if the chimp can use language so facilely, just what distinguishes homo sapiens in the order of creation? Thus endeth the fourth day.
Having suffered trauma as a youngster at the hands of a research scientist, George the gorilla is shy of intimacy. In any case Buz the chimp doesn’t like the “fot, smelly onimal”. George becomes even more skittish with the discovery of a troupe of five more chimps, with no human language ability of course, but Buz takes the role of translator. The situation is now highly complicated indeed. Economics quickly becomes the most pressing issue: How can the food resources of the island be shared and preserved with the growing population? Thus endeth the fifth day.
As the social organisation of the island becomes more stable, Calvin proceeds first with a Passover Seder and then a school(tree) to instruct the other primates, primarily in biblical lore but not neglecting science, particularly Darwinian and Freudian theory. This is where things get….well, weird in the extreme. Calvin decides that it’s his duty to mate with one of the newly mature chimps, Mary Madelyn, in order to speed up the evolutionary re-development of the world. The resulting offspring, a female, is of course chimp not human according to halachic law. But would the chimps see things the same way, particularly since they had in the meantime learned the joy of inter-species homicide with a group of newly arrived baboons? Thus endeth the sixth day.
On the seventh day Calvin rested. And who could blame him? It does not end well for Calvin of course. How could it? He must be sacrificed like Isaac. Or is it like Christ? The new creation goes on without him. Only George the gorilla is there to recite Kadesh, the prayer for the dead.
I cannot do more in understanding, much less interpreting, this novel. Is it a complex allegory of Jewish-Christian relations? Or a gnostic parable of inherent evil in creation? A post-modernist commentary on language or animal rights? Or merely an old man’s parting Jewish joke? Certainly it has similarities with fiction created decades in the future. One thinks particularly of James Morrow and his Blameless in Abaddon and Towing Jehovah. There are even possible echoes in China Mieville’s Embassytown. But ultimately God’s Grace is…well God’s Grace, whatever that may be.
------------------------
Postscript: A kind GR reader has pointed toward the solution, as far as I'm concerned definitive, here:
http://politicsandculture.org/2010/04/29/of-morality-proverbial-wisdom-and-bernard-malamud’s-god’s-grace/
“There is no Man without his Other.” This aphorism of the American philosopher Edgar A. Singer could be the theme (or running joke) of Bernard Malamud’s last novel. Malamud’s technique involves setting up a series of problematic situations in what is essentially a new Genesis as, effectively, a test of Singer’s maxim.
Adonai, HaShem, the Lord, the Creator allows mankind to annihilate itself in a brief but comprehensively decisive nuclear war. The divine intention was the entire eradication of mankind and all other animal life. But divine attention to detail was not all it should have been. Because he is in a deep submersible somewhere under the Pacific Ocean, the interestingly named Calvin Cohn, former rabbinical student turned scientist, son and grandson of a rabbi, accidentally survives.
This unauthorised Noah pleads for life with HaShem who is unsympathetic but fails to take further immediate action except to allow Calvin to drift to a tropical island. This divine indecisiveness produces yet another worry: “On good days Cohn told himself stories, saying the Lord would let him live if he spoke the right words. Or lived the right life. But how was that possible without another human life around?” Thus endeth the first day with the first question.
Turns out there is Another. But it’s a chimpanzee, a rather talented chimpanzee to be sure, but still and all an ape. Can a human-chimp duo constitute a life for either? Particularly if the chimp has been brought up Christian and the man a pious Jew. Can such a mixed family survive the strain of such cultural diversity? There are of course limits to inter-species communication, certainly physical, probably emotional and possibly mental. Nonetheless communication does take place. Is it enough for either party? Thus endeth the second day.
But just as the reader expects a linguistic breakthrough twixt man and beast, his mind is boggled by HaShem’s sense of humour in his operation of the devastated world. The Creator/Destroyer (blessed be his name) has also ‘forgotten’ to destroy a 500 lb. gorilla (the only authentic cliché, I think, in the book). The gorilla has an ear for devotional Yiddish music and so is attracted to the cosy island cave of chimp and man. Three is an awkward problem of course: the perpetual threat of jealousy, or two against one for starters. Does this new social melange inhibit meaningful bonding? Thus endeth day three.
So Buz the chimp, and George the gorilla, and Calvin the human settle down and try to find a social equilibrium. But, another surprise: before the nuclear oven, Buz’s scientist-keeper had fit him up with an artificial larynx. He can talk, with a heavy German accent and a limited vocabulary and no capacity for metaphor, but certainly sufficient to disturb the silence over the breakfast table. Trouble is, the table-talk is, if not intentionally anti-Semitic, then certainly biased toward the New Testament. And yet another, more fundamental problem pops up: if the chimp can use language so facilely, just what distinguishes homo sapiens in the order of creation? Thus endeth the fourth day.
Having suffered trauma as a youngster at the hands of a research scientist, George the gorilla is shy of intimacy. In any case Buz the chimp doesn’t like the “fot, smelly onimal”. George becomes even more skittish with the discovery of a troupe of five more chimps, with no human language ability of course, but Buz takes the role of translator. The situation is now highly complicated indeed. Economics quickly becomes the most pressing issue: How can the food resources of the island be shared and preserved with the growing population? Thus endeth the fifth day.
As the social organisation of the island becomes more stable, Calvin proceeds first with a Passover Seder and then a school(tree) to instruct the other primates, primarily in biblical lore but not neglecting science, particularly Darwinian and Freudian theory. This is where things get….well, weird in the extreme. Calvin decides that it’s his duty to mate with one of the newly mature chimps, Mary Madelyn, in order to speed up the evolutionary re-development of the world. The resulting offspring, a female, is of course chimp not human according to halachic law. But would the chimps see things the same way, particularly since they had in the meantime learned the joy of inter-species homicide with a group of newly arrived baboons? Thus endeth the sixth day.
On the seventh day Calvin rested. And who could blame him? It does not end well for Calvin of course. How could it? He must be sacrificed like Isaac. Or is it like Christ? The new creation goes on without him. Only George the gorilla is there to recite Kadesh, the prayer for the dead.
I cannot do more in understanding, much less interpreting, this novel. Is it a complex allegory of Jewish-Christian relations? Or a gnostic parable of inherent evil in creation? A post-modernist commentary on language or animal rights? Or merely an old man’s parting Jewish joke? Certainly it has similarities with fiction created decades in the future. One thinks particularly of James Morrow and his Blameless in Abaddon and Towing Jehovah. There are even possible echoes in China Mieville’s Embassytown. But ultimately God’s Grace is…well God’s Grace, whatever that may be.
------------------------
Postscript: A kind GR reader has pointed toward the solution, as far as I'm concerned definitive, here:
http://politicsandculture.org/2010/04/29/of-morality-proverbial-wisdom-and-bernard-malamud’s-god’s-grace/
frustratedangel's review against another edition
3.0
God struck the world through a second flood but mistakenly left out the paleologist Calvin Cohn. Cohn pleaded with God to give him another chance at life. God did not explicitly say He is sparing Cohn but indirectly let him live for a couple more years. Cohn ruled the next few years in the company of the chimpanzees. Buz, an intelligent chimapanzee, who was previously experimented with by a great scientist became like a son to him. Mary, another chimpanzee, became his wife and they gave birth to a chimp-human baby. Things go in awry when the chimpanzee community betrays Cohn, trapping him and killing off his baby. Mary, also goes back to being the chimpanzee she really is. As a concluding scene, Buz (his son), gives up Cohn as a burnt offering to God.
I can't really say I enjoyed this book, nor can I say I liked or loved it. It did, however, made me ponder on some points the author might have wanted to put across through this book if I did interpret it correctly.
1. Is God really perfect? (First part of the book where it was explicitly stated that God made a mistake, it would seem that the author is pushing the button. Blasphemy to even think about it but the author was really brave enough to put it as the foundation of his plot for his novel.)
2. Does God really know what He is doing? (Many times throughout the book there were instances where the protagonist continually questions what is God's purpose in making and letting things happen. A question which I'm sure a lot of people have asked throughout ones life. This may be strongly felt by those struggling with faith.)
3. God ultimately is the beginning and end of everything. (Despite Cohn making progress with the chimpanzees, he was still powerless on his own. Also, eventhough he was able to live his life long, he was still doomed to death. Only God has the authority over life. If not for Him, we are nothing.)
This review is a mess. This novel was trying to make a mess. I hope I don't become a mess.
Read Harder Challenge: Opposite Gender
I can't really say I enjoyed this book, nor can I say I liked or loved it. It did, however, made me ponder on some points the author might have wanted to put across through this book if I did interpret it correctly.
1. Is God really perfect? (First part of the book where it was explicitly stated that God made a mistake, it would seem that the author is pushing the button. Blasphemy to even think about it but the author was really brave enough to put it as the foundation of his plot for his novel.)
2. Does God really know what He is doing? (Many times throughout the book there were instances where the protagonist continually questions what is God's purpose in making and letting things happen. A question which I'm sure a lot of people have asked throughout ones life. This may be strongly felt by those struggling with faith.)
3. God ultimately is the beginning and end of everything. (Despite Cohn making progress with the chimpanzees, he was still powerless on his own. Also, eventhough he was able to live his life long, he was still doomed to death. Only God has the authority over life. If not for Him, we are nothing.)
This review is a mess. This novel was trying to make a mess. I hope I don't become a mess.
Read Harder Challenge: Opposite Gender
More...