Scan barcode
dashie's review against another edition
4.0
So basically, this was Socrates fanfiction.
Before reading The Symposium all I knew about it was that it discussed the theory of soulmates; the wheel person with 4 arms and 4 legs that were cut into half by jealous gods and so spent the rest of their lives looking for their other half; told in a serious essay by Plato.
What is was, was a bunch of guys getting drunk in the evening, arguing about love and how the gays are always superior.
There is more than one philosophical analysis of love in this book and is something that resonates a lot with me. I do not place romantic love on this gigantic pedestal as those in my society often do. A love that they will sacrifice life and limb for. And I am glad that Plato writing down what Apollodorus heard Socrates telling the audience what Diotima said to him, actually explored love as being more than just one "kind."
My favourite aspect of this book would be the concept of a symposium which I dearly lack in my real life. There is nothing better I'd like than to lounge on silky pillows and wax poetic about philosophical mumbo-jumbo that will have no added value to the living real life. How deprived am I?
I didn't learn anything new, but I enjoyed feeling clever and pretentious while I read it. And I did have a few questions, trivial at best, that I will have to analyse by giving it a re-read and maybe write down all my thoughts so I can feel like an academic again.
Before reading The Symposium all I knew about it was that it discussed the theory of soulmates; the wheel person with 4 arms and 4 legs that were cut into half by jealous gods and so spent the rest of their lives looking for their other half; told in a serious essay by Plato.
What is was, was a bunch of guys getting drunk in the evening, arguing about love and how the gays are always superior.
There is more than one philosophical analysis of love in this book and is something that resonates a lot with me. I do not place romantic love on this gigantic pedestal as those in my society often do. A love that they will sacrifice life and limb for. And I am glad that Plato writing down what Apollodorus heard Socrates telling the audience what Diotima said to him, actually explored love as being more than just one "kind."
My favourite aspect of this book would be the concept of a symposium which I dearly lack in my real life. There is nothing better I'd like than to lounge on silky pillows and wax poetic about philosophical mumbo-jumbo that will have no added value to the living real life. How deprived am I?
I didn't learn anything new, but I enjoyed feeling clever and pretentious while I read it. And I did have a few questions, trivial at best, that I will have to analyse by giving it a re-read and maybe write down all my thoughts so I can feel like an academic again.
readinginbed888's review against another edition
4.5
Mi sembra di aver compreso appieno la concezione dell’amore platonica dopo aver letto ciò e tutto quello che ho studiato ha ancora più senso. Bellissimo e lifechanging
mittland's review against another edition
4.0
these guys are wasted. great historical insight. I miss going to parties.
pascalibrary's review against another edition
4.0
4/5 Stars. A great novel, great treatise, and great humor.
According to Aristophanes, Symposium and I must have, at one point, been a hideously conjoined book-human abomination because I absolutely LOVED this. By far the best of Plato that I've read so far, though it does have some flaws.
The main thing that made this so palatable was the structure of the book. Putting philosophy into a novelistic format makes it both digestible and interesting. It gives something to break up the flow of logic and argument. The story here was basic, but each character was distinct, at least philosophically, and that was very refreshing compared to a blank slate character designed to just agree with Socrates, or for him to bounce ideas off of.
Each participant in the Symposium gives a separate view on Love and its nature, and each successive one builds on the last in some way. For once, I don't think Socrates completely dominated the discussion. Minus the deities, everyone gave an okay argument, except for Phaedrus. Aristophanes and Agathon stood out, but again all of them were fine. Plato's writing ability was exemplified here and he has cemented himself as an amazing author as well as philosopher.
The only big issue I had with the book was probably due to the specific edition. There were formatting errors here and there, particularly with quotations. Also, the book had an incredibly long introduction that tripled as a summary and dissection. It was before the book actually even started that he dove into the arguments and gave context and whatever else. This was completely meaningless to me since it was, again, before the main book so I had absolutely no clue what he was talking about it. I'm sure it would be interesting afterwards, but reading it first left such a bad taste in my mouth that I probably won't return to it. The order of inclusion baffles me thoroughly.
Overall, this is a great book and the only issues I had with it are probably not present in other editions. For reference, mine was the kindle edition translated by Benjamin Jowett. Symposium is, so far, Plato at his best, and I think this would be a great start for anyone interested in philosophy.
According to Aristophanes, Symposium and I must have, at one point, been a hideously conjoined book-human abomination because I absolutely LOVED this. By far the best of Plato that I've read so far, though it does have some flaws.
The main thing that made this so palatable was the structure of the book. Putting philosophy into a novelistic format makes it both digestible and interesting. It gives something to break up the flow of logic and argument. The story here was basic, but each character was distinct, at least philosophically, and that was very refreshing compared to a blank slate character designed to just agree with Socrates, or for him to bounce ideas off of.
Each participant in the Symposium gives a separate view on Love and its nature, and each successive one builds on the last in some way. For once, I don't think Socrates completely dominated the discussion. Minus the deities, everyone gave an okay argument, except for Phaedrus. Aristophanes and Agathon stood out, but again all of them were fine. Plato's writing ability was exemplified here and he has cemented himself as an amazing author as well as philosopher.
The only big issue I had with the book was probably due to the specific edition. There were formatting errors here and there, particularly with quotations. Also, the book had an incredibly long introduction that tripled as a summary and dissection. It was before the book actually even started that he dove into the arguments and gave context and whatever else. This was completely meaningless to me since it was, again, before the main book so I had absolutely no clue what he was talking about it. I'm sure it would be interesting afterwards, but reading it first left such a bad taste in my mouth that I probably won't return to it. The order of inclusion baffles me thoroughly.
Overall, this is a great book and the only issues I had with it are probably not present in other editions. For reference, mine was the kindle edition translated by Benjamin Jowett. Symposium is, so far, Plato at his best, and I think this would be a great start for anyone interested in philosophy.
witherskeleton's review against another edition
challenging
informative
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
3.5