You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

3.67 AVERAGE

lighthearted relaxing slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
dark emotional hopeful informative reflective sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

I read this at school when I was 14 or 15. I'm still angry. I hate all the men in it.

Ugh Tess! Babe, are you okay? You’ve barely touched your critical thinking skills.

Alec, Tess, and Angel all irritated me to no end. Alec is completely predatory, Tess seems to have no thought at all regarding decisions she makes, and Angel is a self righteous jerk. So why do I give this novel 5 stars? Because it’s well written and completely pulled me in. There’s no denying this novel is a classic for good reason. This novel is only slightly less depressing than Wuthering Heights though.

DNF at 53%

I read this on my first trip to England when I wasn't yet twenty, and it was marvelous. The trip, the age and the book.

I loved this novel. It’s a wonderful story of a country girl and the men who are attracted to her. It’s impressive that a Victorian male author presents this feminist perspective. Beyond the story there are beautiful poetic descriptions of the rural landscapes.

"And it was that touch of the imperfect upon the would-be perfect that gave the sweetness, because it was that which gave the humanity."

Before picking this up, I assumed it was a classic love triangle, including all the angst and sexual tension that usually accompanies such romantic shapes. But it actually goes much deeper.

Tess's case is an incredibly sad one:
Spoilerraped (though Hardy never uses the phrase expressly) by a man she doesn't love and coldly turned away by the one she does upon the discovery of her "impurity." Tess's "defect" is not even remotely her fault, yet the society in which she lives would scorn her for it if they knew. Her own husband who claims to love and cherish her scorns her for it. Alec D'Urberville is never prosecuted or even reported for his actions; he is a wealthy landowner and Tess is a poor milkmaid whose word does not count against his.


Despite nearly one hundred thirty years since its publication, Tess's case sounds eerily similar to that of many women in modern society. While the social stigmas may not be so extreme, the same framework still exists.

And despite my early love for Angel, his
Spoilerhypocrisy disgusted me. Moments before Tess reveals her secrets, he admits to "eight-and-forty hours' dissipation with a stranger." Tess of course forgives him, but when she admits to her own impurity, which, to reiterate, was completely against her will, he immediately despises her and abandons her for a year to go live in Brazil.


But the ending, despite its sobriety, was incredibly suspenseful and definitely a welcome turn of events, even with
SpoilerTess's capture and presumed execution.
Spoiler

I really did love Hardy's writing and the immense detail he used to shape his characters. I'll definitely be seeking more of his other works in the future.

Sad to say that I did not finish this book. I read about 100 pages and just had to stop. I was so excited to read a "classic" but this made me remember why I don't read classics: they're mostly overrated.

DNF unfortunately this book was not to my liking and I just couldn’t finish it. I found it blah. Some portions of the story were written with vibrant imagery but in places it just lacked vision.

I might tackle it again when I’m in my 80s and see if it improves with age or dementia.