Reviews with content warning for Emotional abuse - Bridget Jones's Diary

Reviews tagging 'Emotional abuse'

Bridget Jones's Diary by Helen Fielding

7 reviews

haley_mil_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful lighthearted relaxing medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

drbex's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

I really really did not like this book. I feel like it was trying to hard to be relatable but all it did was make me frustrated with the main character and those around her. It seems very much a book of its time (mid 90s). I understand that women have insecurities, I have my own as well. And I get that it was a diary format so of course it's going to be a bit more unfiltered. And the generational trauma and shame put on her by her mother make sense. But real life and novels need to be different. I need to be able to understand the protagonist's journey. I want to see them grow. Or not. But if they don't, there needs to be a better reason for it. I had no indication that Marc Darcy was actually interested in her. At least in Pride and Prejudice, we have the 3rd person perspective so we can understand things that Lizzy can't. But here all we get is Bridget's incessant whining. Maybe it was the audio book format and being able to hear the intended inflections, but I just found her terribly frustrating without any sort of real change or development through the course of the novel. Also, the fat shaming. I get that it was pushed on her by society, but the woman is almost always within the same 4-6lb weight range. And idk her height, but 120-something is, in most cases, far from overweight. Yes, I get it. It says more about societal standards. But from a 2022 perspective where we are better aware of body positivity, or better yet, body neutrality it's just plain icky.

Content Warnings

strangeeigenfunction's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted medium-paced

Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25

I think the primary reason I read this was hearing it, or maybe the movie, mentioned in a discussion of '00s fatphobia. I haven't seen the movie.

I don't hate Bridget, but I don't really like her, either. In a certain light, this sort of reads as an averted tragicomedy, with Darcy ex machina wrapping up several of the looming tragic ends... or distracting from other ones. Despite enjoying relatively well-off circumstances, there's a lot wrong in Bridget's life that isn't really examined (by her or other characters) in a constructive way. One of those issues is that despite being at what is almost certainly a perfectly healthy weight, she's fixated on losing weight and erratically dieting, disordered eating masquerading as vanilla diet culture. I would also characterize her approach to alcohol as not so healthy, and at times she leans on cigarettes as a coping mechanism, but, while she does recognize these as issues, her attitude regarding quitting leans heavily on willpower in a way that seems naive in the 2020s. And the array of relationships of varying levels of toxicity surrounding her tend to entwine with the drinking and/or the dieting.

It is rather funny, but I'd consider it a bleak humor shaped by normalized dysfunctions.

(by the by, I'm a little peeved at the numbers summary at the end. While I don't care that much whether anyone went through and touted up the in-entry numbers exactly, and I paid less attention to the alcohol counts while reading (units is not that meaningful to me in the US I think), the averages implied by the totals... beg some questions:

5277=14 cigarettes average per day is possible. I'm not sure I think it's accurate (my impression is that about half the recorded days are 18-20+, with a few around 60), but it's not implausible.
3836=10.5 units alcohol average each day. Now, as I said, I paid less attention to the numbers here, but 10, while it happened, feels like it was somewhat atypically high for Bridget, and there were some days she did not drink, so this seems slightly implausible.
11,090,265= ...30,384 calories/day, or fifteen times the RDA. This is essentially impossible, especially as I don't think Bridget ever exceeded 10,000 calories in a day. I might buy something in the 2500 average range (~912,500 total) or even a round 1 million as the yearly total, although I'd guess that probably requires 3000 calories on unrecorded days. But not 30000 a day)

Content Warnings