Scan barcode
afilmfatale's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
A great regency gothic. I really like this author
0325film's review
adventurous
dark
funny
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
schedoni psychopath blueprint
stw07's review against another edition
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
4.0
It was good and had every single one of the gothic tropes I know and love but… this book did not need to be THIS long. Speed it up a little bit, Ann, for god’s sake.
(Side note: the Penguin Classic audiobook I listened to had one chapter that the editor or quality assurance apparently skipped, since there were a bunch of weird sounds and repeated lines from the narrator… like even the editor couldn’t cope with how long this book was)
(Side note: the Penguin Classic audiobook I listened to had one chapter that the editor or quality assurance apparently skipped, since there were a bunch of weird sounds and repeated lines from the narrator… like even the editor couldn’t cope with how long this book was)
dee9401's review against another edition
5.0
I thoroughly enjoyed Ann Radcliffe’s The Italian. While it wasn’t a very deep story, it was well-told and kept me turning pages. At times, the plot twists were a tad melodramatic but she always kept the suspense high throughout three volumes, moved the plot swiftly and tied many threads together by the end. She didn’t explain everything, but I enjoy not having everything neatly tied up. It lets the reader enjoy and continue the story through their own mind.
I was impressed that Radcliffe, writing in 1797, suggests that torture is never a valid method for eliciting truth. Innocents will create false confessions just to stop the pain (vol. 2, p. 199, original text). Today, 217 years later, some still don’t realize that torture is both wrong and useless. She goes further by having one of her lead characters, Vivaldi, comment on the torturer: “that any human being should willingly afflict a fellow being who had never injured, or even offended him; that unswayed by passion, he should deliberately become the means of torturing him, appeared to Vivaldi nearly incredible” (vol. 3, p 312 Oxford World Classics complete edition).
Some might have problems with Ann Radcliffe’s verbose and descriptive language, but this should be savored not feared or dismissed. She was at the cusp of the Romantic movement that explored natural beauty and description of everyday experiences, and her prose is expansive in describing scenery and emotions. Sure, one could probably compress these three volumes into one, or maybe even a novella, but I believe such an effort would diminish the beauty of the journey.
It was a joy to hold these books, both old and new. The leather-bound editions with their old style script and spelling methods were scrumptious. The new Oxford World Classics edition had a wonderful introduction and useful reference materials. Finally, on a personal level, it was fun that one some of the characters were from an area at the base of the Tyrolean Alps. Some of my family is from this area!
I was impressed that Radcliffe, writing in 1797, suggests that torture is never a valid method for eliciting truth. Innocents will create false confessions just to stop the pain (vol. 2, p. 199, original text). Today, 217 years later, some still don’t realize that torture is both wrong and useless. She goes further by having one of her lead characters, Vivaldi, comment on the torturer: “that any human being should willingly afflict a fellow being who had never injured, or even offended him; that unswayed by passion, he should deliberately become the means of torturing him, appeared to Vivaldi nearly incredible” (vol. 3, p 312 Oxford World Classics complete edition).
Some might have problems with Ann Radcliffe’s verbose and descriptive language, but this should be savored not feared or dismissed. She was at the cusp of the Romantic movement that explored natural beauty and description of everyday experiences, and her prose is expansive in describing scenery and emotions. Sure, one could probably compress these three volumes into one, or maybe even a novella, but I believe such an effort would diminish the beauty of the journey.
It was a joy to hold these books, both old and new. The leather-bound editions with their old style script and spelling methods were scrumptious. The new Oxford World Classics edition had a wonderful introduction and useful reference materials. Finally, on a personal level, it was fun that one some of the characters were from an area at the base of the Tyrolean Alps. Some of my family is from this area!
hannahversteegen's review
3.0
I get that it adds to the suspense but those landscape descriptions were looooooong
amandameowly's review
4.0
Ann Radcliffe's, "The Italian," is a novel about a star crossed couple (one rich, one not rich) who face many obstructions to their main goal of being wed. Radcliffe's perfect example of gothic literature at it's fine. While Matthew Lewis' "The Monk" is a prim example of horror gothic literature, Radcliffe exemplifies the advantages of terror gothic. Radcliffe's descriptive language and use of imagery shines through the eighteenth century romantic novel. It is an essential read for any literary buff.
f18's review
adventurous
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Kidnapping and Classism
Moderate: Murder, Violence, Grief, Forced institutionalization, and Religious bigotry
Minor: Gun violence, Confinement, Chronic illness, Rape, and Toxic relationship
just_another_ace_who_reads's review
It was kinda boring – I had to read for class, and it just took forever to get anywhere. It was interesting, just too long and boring
(Date is not accurate)
(Date is not accurate)