Reviews tagging 'Death'

De ce peștii nu există by Lulu Miller

35 reviews

emdowd's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective medium-paced

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

luckyonesoph's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful inspiring reflective medium-paced

3.5

I really love this blend of popular science and memoir, and I appreciate the author's attention to problematic beliefs and theories that often underlie scientific discovery. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sierrabowers's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional informative reflective tense medium-paced

4.0

If you like reading about science and taxonomy, this would be a good book for you. If you’re loosely interested, maybe you would as well. I am not interested in these subjects but the way the author tied the subjects into her own story about life and how the universe is not as it seems… well I was interested to know why fish don’t exist. It was good book! Definitely not what I was expecting but it was enlightening and relaxing. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

confuzzledsheep's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced

2.0

If you are not a biologist, or even yet a Taxonomist, and want to reflect deeply on one's own sadness in the story of the author and David Starr Jordan, then this may be helpful for you. As a depressed biologist who's been long disillusioned with the myth of a Sole Genius Scientist and has already had many of the discussions within this book, I will rate it as passing. I found this book lacking in detail on David Starr Jordans life that I expected it to have- furter discussion of the problems with the Holotype model of taxonomy, the sheer brutality of scientific discovery during the time period. This book touches on those, but never gets as deep as it could. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bookbrig's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative reflective medium-paced

3.5

I learned a lot from this relatively short audiobook, but it wasn't quite what I expected. Which is my own fault for not reading a summary first, but for other readers have a heads up that there's a lengthy dive into eugenics that is well reported and interesting, but heavier than I was anticipating from the cover. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

readingpicnic's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional reflective medium-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

justkellyann's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

inthemoonlight's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional informative reflective medium-paced

5.0

I genuinely have no words for much this impacted me. It is truly beautifully and completely done. 

My only warning would be to look at any trigger warnings if that's something that would impact you. I personally went in blind, not even knowing what it was about, and did not realize how dark things would be. Vital to talk about, but still potentially triggering nonetheless.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

fridayreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful informative reflective sad medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

whatannikareads's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective sad fast-paced

2.75

nooooooot y’all tricking me into reading about a eugenicist!!

i’m a mixed bag of emotions about this book. after about halfway through i think the first half of the book was completely unnecessary/a different book altogether. i fell asleep quite a few times during the first half. the second half was much more interesting, but i kept getting whiplash on the organization of it; we kept switching from history to memoir to social science. i don’t feel the memoir section was expanded enough to be super engaging. the connection between the writer and david star jordan, aside from her research of him, felt like a reach. i think if she has developed her story more, or just made it a completely separate book, it could’ve been more enjoyable. the whole book could’ve just been 3 different articles tbh. it felt like reading a really long op-ed and i don’t think ot should’ve been a book tbh.

also again, i don’t know if talking about how shitty his beliefs were in the second half made up for how nicely he was portrayed in the first half?? it was just very clearly not written by a person of color lol. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings