Reviews

Rabbits for Food by Binnie Kirshenbaum

marykate02's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

bookishonereads's review

Go to review page

4.0

Where is the line between truth teller and sociopath? Rabbits for Food probes that question while exploring the boundaries of audience, narrator, and fiction. I thought it was brilliant and weird, hilarious and heartbreaking, and pretty much did nothing for two days but read this book from cover to cover.

tablife's review

Go to review page

fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? No

3.5

Struggling with deep depression, Bunny ends up institutionalized to try to get her symptoms under control. This novel provides a glimpse into the somberness of depression, but the ending feels a bit abrupt and unfinished. 

sydneyrp143's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

bethyk's review

Go to review page

4.0

i would 100% read this again

lisakerd's review

Go to review page

4.0

Being someone who personally experienced a lot of what Kirshenbaum writes about, I found Rabbits for Food validating and cathartic. She has a way of perfectly articulating what so many in the mental illness community feel (i.e. that the physically ill receive cards and flowers but the mentally ill are tiptoed around because it makes people uncomfortable; being fed up with medications and psychiatrists after trying so many of both; not being taken seriously in the psych ward because you’re “sick in the head,” thus you lose dignity and the respect of being an adult; etc.)

I found some of her metaphors, similes, and intricately crafted sentences exquisitely executed. Although, some completely missed the mark and rambled on like self-indulgent, convoluted nonsense.

As a novel, I felt some things were described with lovely detail: “Her feet are not on the floor, but her back is resting against the arm of the couch, which is camel-backed, olive green velvet. What had passed for shabby chic at the time of purchase is now the furniture equivalent of a dog with mange. The upholstery is shredded, puffs of stuffing sticking out like Albert Einstein’s hair.” (As other reviewers have stated, it is overzealous to label Rabbits a comedy—the proceeding quote is an example of its extent of humor).
However, the lack of investment into an actual storyline left me wanting more. I felt there was a lot of material from which Kirshenbaum could have dug deeper into relationships and a plot. Her chaotic narration simultaneously caused frustration with its near nonexistent fluidity, but also emitted the sense of chaos in Bunny’s brain.

Overall, Kirshenbaum’s novel accurately depicts the numb and empty sentiments of living with major depressive disorder, and life inside the psych ward. And for that, I give Rabbits four stars.

eapreske's review

Go to review page

emotional reflective

4.0

stardustnia's review

Go to review page

dark funny sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

katelinpro's review

Go to review page

dark sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

anythingbutshrimps's review

Go to review page

emotional reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0