Scan barcode
axdixon's review against another edition
2.0
Graphic: Suicide
Moderate: Homophobia, Racism, Transphobia, Body shaming, Xenophobia, and Misogyny
philomathean's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Confinement and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Terminal illness, Transphobia, and Cancer
kermit_the_wrong's review against another edition
Graphic: Transphobia and Suicide
Moderate: Forced institutionalization, Racism, and Drug use
dbuchheister's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Was it racist and transphobic? Yes.
Was it actually creepy or horrifying? Not particularly.
Did I finish it hoping that the end would be good? Yes.
Was it? No. It was a disappointment.
Was there a scene where
Was it actually a compelling and well put together mystery? I really don't feel that way.
Was it too long? Yes.
Would I recommend this to anyone? Absolutely not.
Do I regret reading this? Kind of. I spent way too much time on something so disappointing.
Were there things that were mildly interesting? Sure.
Did that make up for the rest? Nope.
Do with this information what you will.
Graphic: Suicide
Moderate: Child death, Racism, Cancer, and Transphobia
mxpringle's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
Graphic: Pedophilia, Transphobia, Murder, Adult/minor relationship, Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Torture, Sexism, and Racism
Moderate: Suicide, Suicide attempt, Cancer, Trafficking, Violence, Terminal illness, and Stalking
Minor: Mental illness and Medical content
katy_alice's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I still think this book is a lot of fun, the mystery is twisty and dark and the movie stuff and multimedia elements remain the stars. That said, the book has not aged well. A 2024 reader will walk away with concerns about casual use of stereotypes, misogyny and body-shaming descriptions. And while I won’t apologize for my first review (I especially had no idea about the behaviors of the directors I mentioned), I read this book with more knowledge in my brain and a eye for the ways language, especially in genre books, can be casually offensive in ways that don’t enhance the development of characters or narratives.
****************
I want to keep this short, because every second you're reading this, you're not reading 'Night Film'.
This is a rare book that makes you wish it was nonfiction. Pessl creates such a fantastic and enigmatic figure in Cordova and his rabid fictional following that you wish his films were real and his world was ours. The mystery is compelling with great payoff. It's Hitchcock. It's Polanski. It's Kubrick. It's multimedia madness.
Read it.
Graphic: Racism
Moderate: Misogyny, Transphobia, and Fatphobia
rwmurphy's review against another edition
Because of this, I don't want to put myself through what will likely be a 2 star (at most) book, even though I find the mixed media to be fun, I find it really doesn't contribute much, we could get any of the information through a different way very easily, and a lot of the information given through the mixed media segments don't even seem to be relevant, though I didn't even get half way, so maybe it's more useful later.
Moderate: Sexism, Suicide, Transphobia, Homophobia, and Racism
fluoresensitive's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Sovereign. Deadly. Perfect.
The moments of the book I liked (meeting Marlow Hughes, Cordova’s ex-wife; unwinding the “true” story behind Cordova through different people’s perspectives of him) were tainted for me. All in all, an upsetting read. Night Film could’ve been a tour de force with a bit more sensitivity reading, an editor to cut out half the italics, and maybe a little better pacing. This story definitely could’ve lost a hundred or so pages, and kept its substance. Maybe the scenes where Pessl relentlessly bags on trans women can be chopped?
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship, Child death, Racism, and Transphobia
armonim97's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Transphobia and Suicide
ro_lux's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Emotional abuse, Body horror, Gore, Suicide, and Transphobia
Moderate: Cancer, Fatphobia, Drug use, Drug abuse, Gaslighting, Medical content, Alcohol, Car accident, Grief, Death, Fire/Fire injury, Homophobia, Terminal illness, Confinement, Violence, and Animal cruelty
Minor: Racism