Scan barcode
lilifane's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Suicide, Blood, Medical content, Medical trauma, Violence, Murder, Religious bigotry, Death, Injury/Injury detail, Mental illness, Suicidal thoughts, Torture, Confinement, Gore, and Hate crime
bibliomania_express's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: War, Torture, Classism, Death, Violence, Murder, and Kidnapping
Moderate: Gore, Suicide, Religious bigotry, Medical content, Injury/Injury detail, Confinement, Vomit, and Medical trauma
jselliot's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
- A one-sentence summary of this book: Six Wakes is a closed circle scifi murder mystery with clones in deep space.
I started reading this book around 11:30am, and finished at around 11pm after breaks for food/chores/etc. It's very compelling, bingeable, even in spite of all the dark concepts that get rained down on you in what is essentially a biopunk future. While I wouldn't have minded just a little more length to the story, it was still ultimately pretty satisfying. Would have liked more information on Sallie, though, and just what she was doing that she felt the need to expel all of the people that she had successfully used for hundreds of years from the atmosphere. That was one question that just never got answered.
That being said, the world building in this book - for being told in flashbacks - is solid. It presents some excellent thoughts regarding moral/political issues in regards to cloning, and how that might be further refined. And once the twists start unfolding halfway in, they just keep coming and the momentum of the story picks up considerably.
5/5, would read again.
Graphic: Suicide, Medical content, Murder, Violence, Medical trauma, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis
Moderate: Torture, Kidnapping, and Alcohol
caryndi's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.5
For a book that relies so heavily on dialogue, none of the characters had a distinct voice. Some of the dialogue felt like it was written because the author thought it was the way the scene "should" end in a movie or something rather than actually being a good fit for the situation and character.
And—this could just be the part of me that's been trained in screenwriting—but holy cow, there was SO much unnecessary material. The advice to enter a scene as late as possible and leave as quickly as possible is not universal, but it could have improved this book. We would have character A realize something to themself, character B walk in and ask character A about it, and character A go through describing what they had realized, thus repeating something that had happened a few sentences before. This happened multiple times regarding info of varying lengths and was so repetitive.
The characters themselves weren't very strong. As I noted before, the dialogue didn't differentiate them at all. Though they all had unique pasts, I never got a sense of how that had shaped them as individuals. None of them had any strong character traits; though the author would show other people's opinions (i.e., I think Joanna's narration referred to "hurricane Maria" at one point), we never saw actual evidence of this in anyone's behavior. Perhaps because of this, the relationships fell flat; Hiro and Maria's "friendship" was pretty hot-and-cold and felt like its general status was "whatever worked best for the narrative."
The way information was presented in this narrative overall felt cheap, like the author was trying to trick us. Character backstories, etc. weren't revealed in a way that was organic to the narrative and, worse, the rollout was inconsistent. I don't remember any specific examples, but I do think there were situations when a character would have known something because of their backstory, but because the reader didn't yet know it, the information wasn't included. There was also the bit where we learned some of Maria's backstory that
And don't even get me started on the "I did/didn't tell you x because I wanted to see what would happen," which occurred more than once, and from different characters?! I understand some secrets would be kept when everyone wants to move suspicion away from themselves, but that wasn't the case for some things. It really felt like someone had said "hey, why does this happen?" and the author just wrote an excuse into the book and then continued on. It was weird and didn't do anything for the characters—just helped the narrative stay in the shape they wanted it to.
As a reader, I was obviously putting together the information as I got it and trying to figure out the answer; though it was obvious
Finally, I could not get over their solution to the cloning problem being
In some ways, the concepts in this book reminded me of Altered Carbon minus the ~edgy shock value~ but also not nearly as well written. The pieces were there, but the way they were put together was very frustrating to me as a reader and the ultimate payoff didn't feel worth it.
Recommend? You have to know this is going to be a no.
Graphic: Blood, Death, Gore, Medical content, Medical trauma, and Violence
Moderate: Hate crime