Scan barcode
jessica90's review against another edition
2.0
2+
It would have been a much better novel if it hadn't been for the language which was so melodramatic it was ridiculous. It really ruined the reading experience for me and took attention away from the story.
The two title-characters, Marie Curie and Blanche Wittman, were brave and strong women, especially Marie, and it was only their fascinating lives and relationship that kept me reading to the end.
It would have been a much better novel if it hadn't been for the language which was so melodramatic it was ridiculous. It really ruined the reading experience for me and took attention away from the story.
The two title-characters, Marie Curie and Blanche Wittman, were brave and strong women, especially Marie, and it was only their fascinating lives and relationship that kept me reading to the end.
thebobsphere's review against another edition
2.0
The most dominant theme in this book, and is pondered upon by the the author is love. Here love takes on many forms whether one sided, lustful , failed or pure. Enquist examines how it effects the two main protagonists of the novel’s title.
Blanche Wittman was one of the patients of the neurologist J.M. Charcot and ended up as an assistant to Marie Curie. The book details both women’s love affairs including the slight lesbianic one they had with each other. Along in this historical soap opera there are appearances by other famous scientists of the late 1800’s such as Freud, Tourette and Becquerel. Eventually Blanche is amputated and lives in a box (as really happened) and Curie died of over radiation and both transferring their love to their people who adored them the most. In Wittman’s case it was Charcot and in Curie’s case it was Pierre. The whole book takes the form of the author narrating all the details from three notebooks that Wittman left behind.
Historically the book is extremely accurate and the way Enquist manages to make characters interact has to be read. Also the sheer fluidity of the novel’s writing (or at least the translation) is another thing to behold. But, to be honest I found The Book about Blanche and Marie to be rather dull, plus enquist drives his point home by constant repetition, something which irritated me. By the end I was terribly disappointed as I had high hopes for this novel.
Blanche Wittman was one of the patients of the neurologist J.M. Charcot and ended up as an assistant to Marie Curie. The book details both women’s love affairs including the slight lesbianic one they had with each other. Along in this historical soap opera there are appearances by other famous scientists of the late 1800’s such as Freud, Tourette and Becquerel. Eventually Blanche is amputated and lives in a box (as really happened) and Curie died of over radiation and both transferring their love to their people who adored them the most. In Wittman’s case it was Charcot and in Curie’s case it was Pierre. The whole book takes the form of the author narrating all the details from three notebooks that Wittman left behind.
Historically the book is extremely accurate and the way Enquist manages to make characters interact has to be read. Also the sheer fluidity of the novel’s writing (or at least the translation) is another thing to behold. But, to be honest I found The Book about Blanche and Marie to be rather dull, plus enquist drives his point home by constant repetition, something which irritated me. By the end I was terribly disappointed as I had high hopes for this novel.
lnatal's review against another edition
5.0
Just arrived from France through BM.
page 24:
Je ne comprends pas les caprices de cette radiation, elle apparait spontanément, comme si je me tenais devant la surface d'une mer et voyais quelque chose commencer a bouger, a croitre, comme si la mer était un être vivant, un animal marin ou une fleur naturelle, et que je voyais les feuilles se tendre vers moi, cette radioactivité me semble transgresser la première règle de la thermodynamique, quelle est don l'origine primitive de cette force?
I've already read two biographies on Marie Curie's life but I didn't know some personnel details of her life as described in this book, even if it's a work of fiction.
A GREAT book by P.O. Enquist and I'm planning to read more books by this author.
page 24:
Je ne comprends pas les caprices de cette radiation, elle apparait spontanément, comme si je me tenais devant la surface d'une mer et voyais quelque chose commencer a bouger, a croitre, comme si la mer était un être vivant, un animal marin ou une fleur naturelle, et que je voyais les feuilles se tendre vers moi, cette radioactivité me semble transgresser la première règle de la thermodynamique, quelle est don l'origine primitive de cette force?
I've already read two biographies on Marie Curie's life but I didn't know some personnel details of her life as described in this book, even if it's a work of fiction.
A GREAT book by P.O. Enquist and I'm planning to read more books by this author.
More...