Scan barcode
oaysis134's review
challenging
funny
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
incunabula_and_intercourse's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
I'm kind of struggling with this one.
See, If on a winter's night a traveler is the kind of book that should become an instant favorite. Metafictional weirdness, lush prose, absurdism out the wazoo... I loved that! I loved that a lot! I also really likedthe twist with the book titles; I had a hunch that they'd come together to form a cohesive sentence, and I was satisfied at the end when they did just that. Like, objectively, from a craft perspective, this is a masterpiece, and one I heartily recommend.
That being said. From a critical/feminist lens, this book struggles to pass the sniff test. Male characters get to be characters; female characters are always Girls, Young Women, Mistresses. You, the Reader, go to a university, and while you're there, you note the crowds of "young men and girls." And pretty much every woman is either a matron or an object of lust. I thought Lotaria was going in a slightly different, if not mean-spirited "lol these college leftists amirite" direction, but thenyou have sex with her, too . So.
(There's also something to note about how the most lurid and graphic depictions of sex and sexuality happen in stories with non-Western casts, but that's not fully my call to make. It's just a thing that makes me raise my eyebrow somewhat.)
And I get that it's all about, like... Life's all the same story, man, boy meets girl, it's so deep, and yet. The fact that the Reader gets to be an ambiguous (if not straight and male) figure, while the Other Reader has to be Ludmilla, object of desire and pinball passed between different men who want her for different reasons... The fact that when you're addressed as Ludmilla, it's not in the context of you doing things, it's in the context of the Reader analyzing your house while you're not there, or else being the target of his desire... And no, a little wink and a nod to the fact that you're doing the thing doesn't absolve you from the fact that you still did the thing. A trope with a lampshade on is still a trope, and ironic misogyny is still misogyny. It did dampen my enthusiasm somewhat.
So, why the high rating? Well, I'm more lenient on old books and classics, and for all its misogyny, Traveler is still a great book. Like, were I less concerned with feminism, it would have unquestionably been a 5-star favorite read. Think of 4.5 as a consolation prize. But to people giving it lower scores for feminist reasons, I cannot fault you in the slightest, because oh my God, same.
And now I'm realizing that all 3 metafiction books I've read were by white men. This is the genre for me, but I need more female authors, stat.
See, If on a winter's night a traveler is the kind of book that should become an instant favorite. Metafictional weirdness, lush prose, absurdism out the wazoo... I loved that! I loved that a lot! I also really liked
That being said. From a critical/feminist lens, this book struggles to pass the sniff test. Male characters get to be characters; female characters are always Girls, Young Women, Mistresses. You, the Reader, go to a university, and while you're there, you note the crowds of "young men and girls." And pretty much every woman is either a matron or an object of lust. I thought Lotaria was going in a slightly different, if not mean-spirited "lol these college leftists amirite" direction, but then
(There's also something to note about how the most lurid and graphic depictions of sex and sexuality happen in stories with non-Western casts, but that's not fully my call to make. It's just a thing that makes me raise my eyebrow somewhat.)
And I get that it's all about, like... Life's all the same story, man, boy meets girl, it's so deep, and yet. The fact that the Reader gets to be an ambiguous (if not straight and male) figure, while the Other Reader has to be Ludmilla, object of desire and pinball passed between different men who want her for different reasons... The fact that when you're addressed as Ludmilla, it's not in the context of you doing things, it's in the context of the Reader analyzing your house while you're not there, or else being the target of his desire... And no, a little wink and a nod to the fact that you're doing the thing doesn't absolve you from the fact that you still did the thing. A trope with a lampshade on is still a trope, and ironic misogyny is still misogyny. It did dampen my enthusiasm somewhat.
So, why the high rating? Well, I'm more lenient on old books and classics, and for all its misogyny, Traveler is still a great book. Like, were I less concerned with feminism, it would have unquestionably been a 5-star favorite read. Think of 4.5 as a consolation prize. But to people giving it lower scores for feminist reasons, I cannot fault you in the slightest, because oh my God, same.
And now I'm realizing that all 3 metafiction books I've read were by white men. This is the genre for me, but I need more female authors, stat.
egyptiaca's review against another edition
adventurous
emotional
funny
inspiring
lighthearted
mysterious
reflective
relaxing
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
lalexare's review against another edition
4.0
Surreale e geniale come solo Calvino può essere.
Il tema di fondo del libro è il rapporto unico che si instaura tra il lettore, il libro e l'autore, e al contempo tra più lettori.
Le continue interruzioni dei racconti, il continuo entrare e uscire dai romanzi, i salti da un piano all'altro della storia frammentano la lettura rendendola poco scorrevole e volutamente fastidiosa. Calvino riesce a farci provare lo stesso fastidio che provoca al Lettore protagonista, facendoci di fatto immedesimare con lui e parlando, quindi, tanto a lui quanto a noi.
Il tema di fondo del libro è il rapporto unico che si instaura tra il lettore, il libro e l'autore, e al contempo tra più lettori.
Le continue interruzioni dei racconti, il continuo entrare e uscire dai romanzi, i salti da un piano all'altro della storia frammentano la lettura rendendola poco scorrevole e volutamente fastidiosa. Calvino riesce a farci provare lo stesso fastidio che provoca al Lettore protagonista, facendoci di fatto immedesimare con lui e parlando, quindi, tanto a lui quanto a noi.
amy42's review
challenging
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
stefanikovaa_'s review
5.0
On one hand a jumble of unfinished stories, on the other a literary masterpiece on reading and writing in itself.
Definitely will need a reread.
Definitely will need a reread.
bougainvillaya's review against another edition
adventurous
funny
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
im soooooo obsessed w this like it was so well done !! and i love that the chapters ended up as a story!!!!! what!!!!!!! i just thought it was so cool and fun and well structured and SILLY like the cimbrian vs cimerian history and the SPY NOVEL it became towards the end like !!!! silas flannery's diary chapter was my fav. just FUN. also i read this at work and i don't recommend that lmao i felt v awkward
lulamorashi's review
challenging
inspiring
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
5.0
Was recommended to read this for PhD research – it wasn't relevant but it was a fantastically constructed meta-read and I really enjoyed it.