Scan barcode
youngserfs's review against another edition
adventurous
emotional
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
A pretty good book, I thoughtsome of the non-US perspectives were a bit blatantly written by a US author like Max Brooks couldn't imagine anyone in the world not loving the USA or reluctantly appreciating what an "amazing" country it is, but other than those moments I found myself getting caught up in the stories before remembering it was fiction.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Gore, Suicide, and Blood
kbkbkbkbkb's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death and Violence
chezler24's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
This was a re-read for me, and I can safely say that this is still one of the best pieces of zombie-related media out there. Brooks does an excellent job at creating a global view of the zombie war and even considers what it would be like to be stuck in space during the zombie apocalypse! The idea of constructing a book from a series of collected interviews helps show brief glimpses at how different people, groups, and nations dealt with this massive tragedy. While the zombie war is obviously not a real event, the way the book is makes it feel visceral, real, and undeniably human. (Also, after re-reading, I realized there is something a bit funny about me turning to a piece of media centered around a massive pandemic while also currently living through a massive pandemic.)
Content Warnings
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Cursing, Death, Gun violence, Suicide, Blood, Medical content, Medical trauma, Death of parent, Murder, Abandonment, and War
Minor: Cannibalism
ashurah's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Cursing, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, and Cannibalism
romanaromana's review against another edition
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.5
1.5 stars.
More trigger warnings here: https://www.doesthedogdie.com/media/17494 (nothing in this review except zombies and mentions of violence).
There is a moment in World War Z, towards the end, where one character asks the interviewer 'Do you really care about all this?', to which the interviewer responds 'Yes'. It's fair to see me and the interviewer are in disagreement.
World War Z unfolds the truth of the zombie war from the perspective of those who fought and lived it.
I'll begin with the positives before I release the negative drawl that will undoubtedly dominate this review:
Max Brooks clearly researched a lot for this novel, which is always appreciated. I think he was brave to cover such a breadth of topics and bring politics into his zombie narrative so overtly.
Some of the characters' stories were genuinely engaging and gripping. The issue is that these were too few and far between.
And here comes the drawl...
I had issues with the way Max Brooks utilised his oral storytelling. The idea is great and I think it had the potential to work really well, but I struggled with the sheer number of characters that were interviewed because very few of them appeared more than once. This resulted in a hugely fragmented narrative that had almost no cohesion. It was just a string of anecdotes, with their only connection being the living dead.
The majority of these voices also had a tendency to waffle and overshare. This wasn't a case of fleshing out the story or adding life to their recollections; this was pure pointlessness. I mean, 300 pages in do I really care about the mechanics of a diving suit? Even 50 pages in I wouldn't have cared to be honest, but seriously?
The politics also got a bit much as it ultimately lessened the impact of the zombies themselves, who became almost irrelevant as Brooks made way for his political theories and continental conflict of humans. I understand that this was the story he was choosing to tell, and one which undoubtedly required a lot of thought, but I was bored of it.
I really wanted to like this more because zombies are intriguing and, frankly, the film made this seem like it would be a real thrill. But I've made the executive decision not to associate the two forms because, as Brooks himself admitted, they have nothing in common. And on that note, good riddance to this version.
More trigger warnings here: https://www.doesthedogdie.com/media/17494 (nothing in this review except zombies and mentions of violence).
There is a moment in World War Z, towards the end, where one character asks the interviewer 'Do you really care about all this?', to which the interviewer responds 'Yes'. It's fair to see me and the interviewer are in disagreement.
World War Z unfolds the truth of the zombie war from the perspective of those who fought and lived it.
I'll begin with the positives before I release the negative drawl that will undoubtedly dominate this review:
Max Brooks clearly researched a lot for this novel, which is always appreciated. I think he was brave to cover such a breadth of topics and bring politics into his zombie narrative so overtly.
Some of the characters' stories were genuinely engaging and gripping. The issue is that these were too few and far between.
And here comes the drawl...
I had issues with the way Max Brooks utilised his oral storytelling. The idea is great and I think it had the potential to work really well, but I struggled with the sheer number of characters that were interviewed because very few of them appeared more than once. This resulted in a hugely fragmented narrative that had almost no cohesion. It was just a string of anecdotes, with their only connection being the living dead.
The majority of these voices also had a tendency to waffle and overshare. This wasn't a case of fleshing out the story or adding life to their recollections; this was pure pointlessness. I mean, 300 pages in do I really care about the mechanics of a diving suit? Even 50 pages in I wouldn't have cared to be honest, but seriously?
The politics also got a bit much as it ultimately lessened the impact of the zombies themselves, who became almost irrelevant as Brooks made way for his political theories and continental conflict of humans. I understand that this was the story he was choosing to tell, and one which undoubtedly required a lot of thought, but I was bored of it.
I really wanted to like this more because zombies are intriguing and, frankly, the film made this seem like it would be a real thrill. But I've made the executive decision not to associate the two forms because, as Brooks himself admitted, they have nothing in common. And on that note, good riddance to this version.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Animal death, Gore, Gun violence, Suicide, Violence, Cannibalism, War, and Injury/Injury detail
onemamareads's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Read my full review here: https://onemamassummer.weebly.com/book-reviews/world-war-z
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Death, Gore, Death of parent, and Murder
ripxreads's review against another edition
dark
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death and Gore
sarahholliday's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
informative
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? N/A
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.0
This brilliantly constructed book has become a horror classic for a reason. The complexity of Brooks' story, the detail with which he illuminates all aspect of life during and after the Zombie War, the wide range of moral codes he explores...it's utterly unique and will leave you in awe of the mind that came up with it all.
Because of that complexity it can occasionally feel like a slog to get through, especially the middle chapters, but it is still an expertly crafted and well-written book. Perfect for anyone looking for a horror novel without the jump scares or high tension.
Because of that complexity it can occasionally feel like a slog to get through, especially the middle chapters, but it is still an expertly crafted and well-written book. Perfect for anyone looking for a horror novel without the jump scares or high tension.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Cursing, Death, Gore, Mental illness, Suicide, Violence, Blood, Excrement, Cannibalism, War, and Injury/Injury detail
tardycreative's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Quite an inspiring read, very exciting and thought provoking!
This is how world building should be done.
This is how world building should be done.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Racial slurs, Suicide, Violence, Xenophobia, Vomit, and War
brennaa's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Gun violence, Violence, Death of parent, and War
Moderate: Animal death, Child death, Mental illness, and Grief
Minor: Cannibalism