You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
4.23 AVERAGE
4.23 AVERAGE
funny
inspiring
reflective
emotional
funny
inspiring
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
I absolutely despised the first 50% and loved every word of the second. I simply cannot believe how stark the difference was. Every interaction between scientists in the first half: bad, smugly written, my head has been squished to pulp with the hammer of SEXISM BAD IN THE 50S. Every interaction between any other combo of people in the second: not that.
But the dog and the precocious child. Why. Why those things.
But the dog and the precocious child. Why. Why those things.
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
emotional
funny
inspiring
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual assault
emotional
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
emotional
funny
lighthearted
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Did capture me enough, might come on to it when I have more time
I loved this book. I loved how all the characters had their own flaws and could recognize them and try to be better. There should’ve been a trigger warning for the sexual assaults, and I did have to stop reading a couple of times throughout because I was crying and couldn’t see through my tears. All in all it was very quirky and thought provoking with the debate of science and religion and I loved it. I loved Six Thirty and he is one of the best characters I’ve ever read.