Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.45 AVERAGE
3.45 AVERAGE
adventurous
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
"It's a shame that we humans are never able to pull in the same direction, not even when confronted by infinity."
Clarke's follow-up to Rendezvous with Rama. It has been 70 odd years since the Rama craft passed through the solar system awhile some things on earth changed most stayed the same. But now a second craft is coming, and second chance to understand our place in the universe compared to the Ramans. Will questions get answered or will newer ones arise.
Clarke spends the first quarter of the book establishing the fallout on earth post the first Rama, from a massive financial boom and bust to mistrust in space agencies, to an expansion of Christianity trying to bring the Ramans into their view. When humanity spots the new craft they are excited but a bit hesitant to visit again. We meet the crew a cast from various countries tasked to explore the spacecraft with the knowledge from the first flyby. They are all geniuses in their fields but some have alternative motives such as fame, money, power, for going.
Once at the craft things are going similar to the first until the lights come on early and the craft makes a course correction putting onto a path with earth. Crew members start to die or go missing and the reminder is tasked with blowing up the craft before it gets to earth. At least until one of the members with the nuclear codes has a moral dilemma and sets off the race to save the craft.
While the first was very hard scifi about first encounters, this book was more humanity's response to that encounter. People plotting on how to best use or make use out of the encounter. It did have the philosophical questions you typically see in scifi, things like just because it is advanced and we don't understand it and its motives should we destroy it. It also had a bit of a horror vibe with crew members dying or going missing.
Overall a decent follow up to the first. And heck with a shout out from playboy on the cover who can argue?
Clarke's follow-up to Rendezvous with Rama. It has been 70 odd years since the Rama craft passed through the solar system awhile some things on earth changed most stayed the same. But now a second craft is coming, and second chance to understand our place in the universe compared to the Ramans. Will questions get answered or will newer ones arise.
Clarke spends the first quarter of the book establishing the fallout on earth post the first Rama, from a massive financial boom and bust to mistrust in space agencies, to an expansion of Christianity trying to bring the Ramans into their view. When humanity spots the new craft they are excited but a bit hesitant to visit again. We meet the crew a cast from various countries tasked to explore the spacecraft with the knowledge from the first flyby. They are all geniuses in their fields but some have alternative motives such as fame, money, power, for going.
Once at the craft things are going similar to the first until the lights come on early and the craft makes a course correction putting onto a path with earth. Crew members start to die or go missing and the reminder is tasked with blowing up the craft before it gets to earth. At least until one of the members with the nuclear codes has a moral dilemma and sets off the race to save the craft.
While the first was very hard scifi about first encounters, this book was more humanity's response to that encounter. People plotting on how to best use or make use out of the encounter. It did have the philosophical questions you typically see in scifi, things like just because it is advanced and we don't understand it and its motives should we destroy it. It also had a bit of a horror vibe with crew members dying or going missing.
Overall a decent follow up to the first. And heck with a shout out from playboy on the cover who can argue?
Why does every one hate this book so much? I thought it was a pretty entertaining sequel.
challenging
mysterious
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
apparently I started this book in 2016 and abandoned after two chapters. I have zero memory of any of it. made it 68% of the way through this time, but only by the lightest of skimming. putrid overblown bestseller wannabe uses the entire Rama concept as toilet paper. did arthur need the money so badly? embarassing.
adventurous
emotional
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Content Warnings
Moderate: Racism, Sexism
Minor: Adult/minor relationship, Racial slurs, Sexual assault, Death of parent, Abandonment
adventurous
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Extremely different to the first book and only co authored by Clarke
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Dropped a star because of how he butchered the Catholic faith, and then discovered that he had the help of a priest to do that. The Bible says we’d have false shepherds. It was really disgusting.
As for the rest of the story - characters are 2 dimensional. It was Sergio. The first 30% of the book was a waste of time. I enjoyed the first one, but the book could have just been a short story and been just fine.
As for the rest of the story - characters are 2 dimensional. It was Sergio. The first 30% of the book was a waste of time. I enjoyed the first one, but the book could have just been a short story and been just fine.
Absolute tripe. Non-existent pacing and ACC is obviously not the lead author.