Reviews tagging 'Gun violence'

The Drawing of the Three by Stephen King

36 reviews

eggyleggy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

love love love love love

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jrmrf's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark lighthearted slow-paced

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

directorpurry's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

moony32's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional tense medium-paced

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nodogsonthemoon's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ggcd1981's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Este é o quarto livro (não contando os contos) que leio de Stephen King e o segundo volume da The Dark Tower Series. Vi várias pessoas dizendo que é no segundo livro que a série começa a ficar boa, mas na verdade preferi The Gunslinger a The Drawing of the Three, apesar da diferença não ser grande. No primeiro volume o mundo era intrigante e misterioso, o livro tinha problemas, mas não superaram meu interesse pelo mundo e personagens. Em The Drawing of the Three, apesar do positivo superar o negativo, os problemas da obra me incomodaram mais. Sendo breve sobre os pontos negativos:
A) Detta Walker, uma das personalidades de Odetta Holmes. Detta é um estereotipo ofensivo de mulher negra, King está ciente disso pois na obra Roland e Eddie Dean referenciam este fato literalmente dizendo que Detta age como um estereotipo. Porém o texto estar ciente disso não torna a leitura das cenas de Detta mais agradável. Ao final da obra o melhor evento é que Detta some (assim como Odetta) dando lugar a personalidade unificada de Susana Dean; B) a hiper-sexualização de personagens femininos, o que já acontecia no volume 1, mas infelizmente continua no volume 2; C) O último elemento que não gostei foi que em alguns momentos King escolheu mostrar a mesma cena do ponto de vista de várias pessoas, incluindo, por exemplo, Roland dentro da cabeça de Eddie e o próprio Eddie. As sequências em que o autor fez isso eram breves porem repetitivas e deixavam a cena um pouco maçante.


Apesar desses pontos o livro foi interessante e de fácil leitura. Gostei do conceito de 3 portas na praia que levavam para dentro da cabeça de pessoas no mundo que conhecemos: O prisioneiro Eddie Dean, A dama das sombras Odetta Holmes/Detta Walker e Morte, Jack Mort (um psicopata assassino responsável por eventos horríveis que influenciaram as vidas dos personagens do livro). Eu sempre prefiro os aspectos fantásticos do que os elementos mais realistas da história (ex. de realidade: o envolvimento de Eddie no tráfico de drogas).
Os personagens continuam sendo um ponto alto da escrita de King e ele faz com que ler sobre eles seja interessante mesmo quando você não gosta de alguns deles. Muita gente critica King por escrever demais. Para mim todos os detalhes que ele acrescenta dão profundidade ao mundo e personagens. Continuarei com a série e dou a The Drawing of the Tree 3.5 estrelas. 


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sharebear431's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

tessanie's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious medium-paced

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bluejayreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

3.0

This was a weird reading experience. I’m reading this series more to talk about it with a friend than because I want to read it, and if it wasn’t for him I wouldn’t have continued after The Gunslinger. This book does get more into the action, so it felt less like an extended beginning and more like an actual story. At some points it was even enjoyable. 

Roland spends this book going back and forth through doors that are only half there to collect the three people the man in black told him he needed. These three people are in our world in different times. There’s Eddie, a drug addict who’s on his first smuggling run when Roland meets him and who quickly became my favorite. There’s Odetta, a black amputee and two different varieties of racist stereotype. And there’s Jack Mort, whose section was fairly enjoyable even though I spent the entire time hoping that he would not have to end up joining the group. 

That’s pretty much the plot. There’s an overarching plot of Roland has an infected injury and is trying to stay alive and the three shorter plots of what’s through the doors and trying to get the three people to join him, tied together by sections of walking down a disturbing beach. It is slow-paced, but it’s interesting enough, and compared to book one it’s absolutely action-packed.

It was true of book one, and only got more extreme in this book, but The Drawing of the Three falls into one of my biggest complaints with adult fantasy-adjacent books: relying on grossness and bodily fluids to portray “realism.” There’s a lot of urine, feces, sweat, pus, saliva, and all other kinds of disgusting liquid-ish things that the human body can produce. I know that it is realistic, but personally I read for fun and prefer all the gross stuff to be sanitized by the lens of fiction. I’m aware this is a personal opinion, but if bodily fluids make you squeamish you may want to skip this one. 

I was also pretty weirded out by the preteen girl masturbation scene and the guy who orgasmed by murdering people, but it’s not like Stephen King has never written creepy sexual scenes before, so I guess that’s a risk you take when reading his books. 

When I finished this book, I was really ambivalent about reading on. Even though this series isn’t the worst thing I’ve ever read, it’s a little too slow and gross for me. This series was starting to feel more like an obligation than anything I particularly want to read. But my friend who’s also reading the series gave me a spoiler for future books that makes me more interested in reading on. So I guess I am continuing the series after all. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bookbelle5_17's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Review of The Drawing of Three
By: Stephen King
If “The Gunslinger” is the prologue, then “The Drawing of Three” is when the real story begins. Roland wakes up on a beach right after his encounter with The Man in Black. He must find the 3 doors and the 3 beings, The Prisoner, The Lady of Shadows, the Pusher/Death. First, he comes to New York City in the 80s (I think) and meets junkie Eddie Dean. The second door leads to the 50s (again, I think) where he meets Susannah a wheel chair bound black woman who has a dual personality. The trio travels together on this beach in search of the third door with one of Susannah’s personalities fighting them the whole way.
If you know anything about Stephen King then you can guess that Eddie Dean probably has a bit in common with the author. He is a character I got frustrated with and I confess I couldn’t relate to his problems. Though, I understood his love and loyalty to his older brother Henry, even if he didn’t deserve it. Luckily, my sister does deserve my love and loyalty unlike Henry Dean. Eddie’s drug addiction makes him paranoid, anxious, and temperamental. The situation Roland, and partially his brother, puts him in makes his moodiness worse. He was hard for me to like but as the story progresses I liked him more. I enjoyed Susannah more as a character especially with her going back and forth with her personalities, even though one of the personalities is hateful and down right mean. Her monstrous personality is more compelling with her hatefulness, paranoia, and she proves herself to be incredibly smart but using her smarts for more selfish reasons. Both of them are sympathetic, but Eddie had a choice while what happened to Susannah that caused her two personalities was not something she chose. The lobstrosities are creepy and ugly to imagine as we anticipate when they’re going to come and attack the trio. The relationship between this trio is compelling to read as they have a love/hate feeling towards each other. Eddie resents that Roland has dragged him along on this dangerous mission and finds the Gunslinger to be a hypocrite, because he believes Roland is a Junkie for the Tower. He also has fallen for Susannah and hates Roland for putting her in danger as well. The endless beach that King describes adds to the tension as we don’t know when it will stop and they’ll get to their destination. It is an uncomfortable situation for all and emotions are high. Roland accepts and knows more than the others and he won’t show emotion as he doesn’t question anything. He is that person that says it’s all meant to be and that frustrates Eddie. The juxtaposition of our world and versus this part of Roland’s is interesting and highlights how bizarre his world is compare to ours. He fascinated by things we take for granted and things that are common sense to us is bewildering for him. He notices how much paper we use and he cannot believe it as paper in his world is rare and a valuable commodity. He is amused by the drug store and has mixed feelings about our food. His outsider perspective allows him to see more clearly like with Eddie and his addiction. I vaguely remember loving the “The Waste Lands’, the third book in the series, so I cannot wait to start it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings