Scan barcode
letterpress's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Death, Cultural appropriation, Toxic friendship, Vomit, Suicidal thoughts, Panic attacks/disorders, and Gaslighting
Minor: Cursing and Rape
juphip's review
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Rape
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders, Suicidal thoughts, Toxic friendship, Vomit, and Racism
andibez's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Death
Minor: Vomit
te_ss_i's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Panic attacks/disorders, Body horror, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Injury/Injury detail, Death, Classism, Grief, Stalking, Death of parent, Sexual harassment, Sexual assault, Colonisation, Gaslighting, Xenophobia, Toxic friendship, Cultural appropriation, Vomit, Mental illness, Bullying, Violence, Toxic relationship, Suicidal thoughts, Sexual violence, Emotional abuse, Rape, and Racism
jourdanicus's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
For such a character-focused book, the characters felt like they lacked depth and nuance. I mean, maybe that was the point, but if that's the case it made the book feel like a too-heavy handed attempt at satire. Either that or Kuang is just VERY good at writing extremely unlikeable characters.
For me there was also too much content that consisted only of the main character scrolling and reading social media... I read books to get away from that, not continue to be immersed in it for at least 50% of the book 😅
This book was still very readable despite the fact that it couldn't seem to decide what it wanted to be. Again, maybe that's the point given the internal conflict of the main character, but really it just made things kind of confusing.
I did like the twist of *how* Athena died, that came as a surprise to me... But then the rest of the story felt like it dragged. I wanted more surprises!
3/5⭐ for me - I liked it enough to be able to finish it but not much more than that - plus an extra half a star for respect to the author in case this one just went over my head LOL.
Graphic: Death
Moderate: Toxic friendship, Vomit, and Racism
Minor: Death of parent, Violence, and Injury/Injury detail
daisyfont's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Death, Emotional abuse, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Alcohol, Blood, Grief, Injury/Injury detail, Suicidal thoughts, and Vomit
Minor: Murder
dreklogar's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Is it okay to tell stories that you weren't a part of, but you researched thoroughly? Is it okay to tell stories that are part of your generational trauma, but didn't actually happen to you? Is it okay to take personal stories people tell you and twist them into a short story, or a book?
And looking at book events, of course, how can we know someone's credentials? We shouldn't force anyone into outing themselves to write about their identity, but that is also the only way to really know if someone is writing about events that they are personally familiar with or not.
Additionally, which events/experiences fall under "write what you know"? If I've never walked down a particular street, I cannot imagine anyone would be bothered by my mentioning that my character did. If I mention my character visited a fast-food chain and look up their menu online, no one cares if I've also tried the item.
But when would it have been okay? Was the writer expected to just keep that experience buried, forever, not allowed to talk about it even if they anonymized it? Was the problem that they gained fame over it? And how does this line relate to her also writing about Korean experiences that she is, presumably, even further removed from?
I don't really have any answers, but as a hobbyist writer myself, that was what I found most gripping about the text.
Graphic: Death, Panic attacks/disorders, Racism, Toxic friendship, and Suicidal thoughts
Moderate: Vomit and Sexual violence
kanjichris's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Death, Toxic friendship, and Cultural appropriation
Moderate: Racism, Mental illness, and Sexism
Minor: Racial slurs, Sexual assault, Vomit, and Suicidal thoughts
juliesleseecke's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Sexual assault, Sexism, Injury/Injury detail, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Panic attacks/disorders, Racism, Mental illness, Bullying, Alcohol, Emotional abuse, Vomit, Toxic friendship, Suicidal thoughts, Racial slurs, Grief, Gaslighting, Death, and Cultural appropriation
Moderate: Stalking and Rape
Minor: Addiction
emmerylynn's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Cursing, Death, Cultural appropriation, and Racism
Moderate: Vomit and Rape
Minor: Suicidal thoughts