3.82 AVERAGE

hamwhig's review

5.0

The first half of the book is a very interesting first hand account of the conditions of English miners in 1937. The second half of the book is Orwell’s argument for socialism. He makes an impassioned case although I feel he went wrong in two places. First when he says that people are put off but looking at the adherents of socialism, their rhetoric or even the manifestation of socialism in certain country’s, I would say this is a problem that still exists with socialism even almost 100 years later today. It might even be an intractable problem of the socialist system, that being said you can find un attractive adherents of any political school of thought. Secondly Orwell makes a false dichotomy between socialism and facism as if it’s one or the other and England has to make a choice.
Orwell also talks about socialism as if it’s the only thing that will improve the lot of the working class in England. Which in hindsight wasn’t the case.
informative reflective medium-paced
informative reflective medium-paced

When I started the book it took a little to figure out it's not fiction. Orwell did an amazing job in preparation to write the book, but the book itself is pretty boring. He made some great insight in the second part of the book, about war and fascism, but also mistakes in how machines would make job disappear.
challenging dark informative reflective medium-paced
medium-paced
challenging hopeful informative reflective medium-paced
adventurous hopeful informative reflective sad medium-paced

Orwell starts this book with a view into the everyday lives of coal miners in the north of England. He describes their living conditions, diets, habits, and opinions. Then abruptly he breaks with his sociological essay and dives into the merits of Socialism and critiques their attempts to win wider political support. Throughout he offers a fascinating look at 1930s England and the politics of the day.

Unfortunately much of what Orwell predicted for the future panned out in the few years after the book was published. And even more unfortunately his voice gains new relevancy in light of the recent American election.

A worthwhile read ultimately, but not a book I will pick up again.

"We are living in a world in which nobody is free, in which hardly anybody is secure, in which it is almost impossible to be honest and to remain alive."

"It is only when you meet someone of a different culture from yourself that you begin to realise what your own beliefs really are."

"This is the inevitable fate of the sentimentalist. All his opinions change into their opposites at the first brush of reality."

"If there is one man to whom I do feel myself inferior, it is a coal-miner."

"The train bore me away, through the monstrous scenery of slag-heaps, chimneys, piled scrap-iron, foul canals, paths of cindery mud criss-crossed by the prints of clogs. This was March, but the weather had been horribly cold and everywhere there were mounds of blackened snow. As we moved slowly through the outskirts of the town we passed row after row of little grey slum houses running at right angles to the embankment. At the back of one of the houses a young woman was kneeling on the stones, poking a stick up the leaden waste-pipe which ran from the sink inside and which I suppose was blocked. I had time to see everything about her—her sacking apron, her clumsy clogs, her arms reddened by the cold. She looked up as the train passed, and I was almost near enough to catch her eye. She had a round pale face, the usual exhausted face of the slum girl who is twenty-five and looks forty, thanks to miscarriages and drudgery; and it wore, for the second in which I saw it, the most desolate, hopeless expression I have ever-seen. It struck me then that we are mistaken when we say that ‘It isn’t the same for them as it would be for us,’ and that people bred in the slums can imagine nothing but the slums. For what I saw in her face was not the ignorant suffering of an animal. She knew well enough what was happening to her—understood as well as I did how dreadful a destiny it was to be kneeling there in the bitter cold, on the slimy stones of a slum backyard, poking a stick up a foul drain-pipe."

"To begin with, there is the frightful debauchery of taste that has already been effected by a century of mechanisation. This is almost too obvious and too generally admitted to need pointing out. But as a single instance, take taste in its narrowest sense - the taste for decent food. In the highly mechanical countries, thanks to tinned food, cold storage, synthetic flavouring matters, etc., the palate it almost a dead organ. As you can see by looking at any greengrocer’s shop, what the majority of English people mean by an apple is a lump of highly-coloured cotton wool from America or Australia; they will devour these things, apparently with pleasure, and let the English apples rot under the trees. It is the shiny, standardized, machine-made look of the American apple that appeals to them; the superior taste of the English apple is something they simply do not notice. Or look at the factory-made, foil wrapped cheeses and ‘blended’ butter in an grocer’s; look at the hideous rows of tins which usurp more and more of the space in any food-shop, even a dairy; look at a sixpenny Swiss roll or a twopenny ice-cream; look at the filthy chemical by-product that people will pour down their throats under the name of beer. Wherever you look you will see some slick machine-made article triumphing over the old-fashioned article that still tastes of something other than sawdust. And what applies to food applies also to furniture, houses, clothes, books, amusements and everything else that makes up our environment. These are now millions of people, and they are increasing every year, to whom the blaring of a radio is not only a more acceptable but a more normal background to their thoughts than the lowing of cattle or the song of birds. The mechanisation of the world could never proceed very far while taste, even the taste-buds of the tongue, remained uncorrupted, because in that case most of the products of the machine would be simply unwanted. In a healthy world there would be no demand for tinned food, aspirins, gramophones, gas-pipe chairs, machine guns, daily newspapers, telephones, motor-cars, etc. etc.; and on the other hand there would be a constant demand for the things the machine cannot produce. But meanwhile the machine is here, and its corrupting effects are almost irresistible. One inveighs against it, but one goes on using it. Even a bare-arse savage, given the change, will learn the vices of civilisation within a few months. Mechanisation leads to the decay of taste, the decay of taste leads to demand for machine-made articles and hence to more mechanisation, and so a vicious circle is established."

"To write books you need not only comfort and solitude—and solitude is never easy to attain in a working-class home—you also need piece of mind. You can't settle in to anything, you can't command the spirit of hope in which anything has got to be created, with that dull evil cloud of unemployment hanging over you."

"Words are such feeble things."