Reviews

Stray City by Chelsey Johnson

octoberdream's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny informative inspiring reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? Yes

4.75

jcinf's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful inspiring reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

For the most part, I really enjoyed this book. I loved the complexity of characters and the uniqueness of the plot. I loved the insight into the Queer Portland scene in the late 90s. 

My main complaint is the biphobia. Andrea had significant internalized biophobia herself. My thought is, yes, characters *can* be problematic. But it went unaddressed. There was never an acknowledgment of the problematic nature of the comments that were made. And as I am just starting to lean into my bi identity, I was a little shocked that some (yes, I know, I said SOME) lesbians really have such an intense dislike for bi women. 

Here’s a spoiler if you want to be aware of this scene going into the book:
exerpt from pages 181 and 182: “I couldn’t even say [the word bisexual]… We all knew girls who were bisexual. Or whatever. Girls who we thought were one of us then went for a roll in the hay with a boy. Which was fine. We just didn’t necessarily want to know about it… Because to us, bisexual was the earnest white girl in your women’s studies class who had a nice boyfriend and wanted to clock in a little more oppression... Bisexual was the way celebrities avoided it, or faked it. Or couples in the bar or the classifieds who wanted a third. Or women who remained happily married or boyfriended a guy who was okay with their getting with another woman, or who just felt emotionally open to the possibility, who thought they could get into if they gave it a shot, like hot yoga.”


You would think one marginalized group wouldn’t harbor such hate for another marginalized group. I mean, really? Lesbian pick-me’s is what I got from it. Plus, it’s hard to tell if the characters are biphobic or if the author is. Maybe it’s just meant to reflect the attitude of the time. But to me, it didn’t feel like commentary about the bi-erasure in the 90s. It could’ve gone that direction, but the disdain for bi women continued for almost a full page. It felt like the author airing her issues with bi women instead of making meaningful commentary about the time period. 

It didn’t put me off from finishing the book, but it did dock some points for me. 

Otherwise, I really enjoyed this read. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jrobinw's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Excellent book in its writing and story.

fordeverystream's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A surprisingly sweet and wholesome story about post-grunge, Gen X, lesbian Portland

sonni89's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This one really surprised me. I didn't think I'd love this book as much as I did, but I really, really loved it.

The description in the book was so vivid that I had no problem at all picturing the queer scene of Portland in the late 90s, even though I've never been there and knew absolutely nothing about it prior to reading this. I really, really loved the story. I loved the format of it, with prose, epistolary elements, and a bunch of cool other things (an interview with real and fake answers next to one another in columns, for example) and multiple points of view mixed together, and I loved how fleshed out all the characters were.

This would've been a five-star read, if it wasn't for the completely unchallenged biphobia in one part of the book (which I'm guessing was typical for the time period and setting, but still made me physically recoil by how vicious it was; doesn't matter that the protagonist wasn't actually bi in the first place, it was still gross to read) and the fact that I felt the story ended very abruptly. An extra 10 pages or so would've made it felt a lot more complete.

But yeah, overall, this was a really good read.

shelfimprovement's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Started strong, but the back half felt rushed. More to come.

corbinlamont's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Love letter to a Portland that is gone now.

mactammonty's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This was a difficult book to fall into. I dislike first person poverty, especially when the character comes across badly. I really disliked Andrea.

soubhi's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25