weekday's review against another edition

Go to review page

I didn't enjoy the writing and I didn't reap any good advice.

mdrewb20's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I'm glad I got the audiobook version of this, the author is a good storyteller. The book started out fairly strong and seemed to be going places, but it lost its way towards the end. Still, it was an enjoyable listen even if I really didn't learn anything.

bre13rose's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring lighthearted reflective fast-paced

4.5

kweber1989's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective relaxing fast-paced

3.0

As a therapist, I understood most of what Alan was referencing in this book, but that doesn’t make it any less interesting. I appreciated reading about communication from the perspective of improv as a tool, as that’s something I haven’t (and probably would never) do. Good if you’re looking for a quick read on communication, but if it was any longer I may not have finished it. Just appreciating the little reminder of the importance of empathy. 

rossfreeman's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The content of this book is good, highly relevant but perhaps slightly drawn out. Comparisons between Alda's career as an actor and the science behind empathizing, relating and connecting with your audience are well made. It changed my opinion of improv and the benefits that people derive from this when trying to understand others better. I enjoyed Alda's writing style: droplets of humour and regular use of story.

It's ironic that I'm critiquing the communication of a book based on communication, but I felt that there was often a tenuous link between chapters. The first section of the book was also lengthy and could have been more compact (much like the book's title).

Content putting the book down after a chapter or two. Average.

stevenyenzer's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Kind of a weird pop-science-cum-memoir. Alda is a solid writer and the questions he asks of scientists are interesting. But it didn't quite come together for me.

ids100's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

4.5

papidoc's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Alan Alda (yes, that Alan Alda) does a nice job of exploring some interesting ideas on how to improve communication, especially that of scientists and other experts communicating with less expert audiences. I have learned and adopted some of his recommendations simply as a result of 30 years of trial and error, but others were new to me, and almost immediately useful. This is one book I wish had been available when I began my career in the early eighties.

Alda, who has worked closely with the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science since it was established at Stony Brook University in 2009, is funny, engaging, interesting, and scientifically rigorous as he explores ways of improving communication. These range from what we can learn and adapt from improvisational techniques, to how to ethically use (and not abuse) empathy, to how to adjust to your audience, and what we can learn from work with people on the autism spectrum (mirroring techniques).

For anyone interested in improving their communication skills (which should be everyone!), I recommend this book. Read it with a notebook nearby, and do more than just absorb the information...practice it!

dee_loves_toread's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative inspiring reflective medium-paced

4.75

singuyen's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Alan Alda did a fantastic job at applying his own lessons that he is trying to deliver to readers, while writing the book, especially when explaining concepts to his audience who may not have a ton of prior knowledge about the subject of communication.

I have learned more about the importance of paying attention and tuning into the person(s) in front of you; and talking while also caring about how well you are delivering your knowledge and how well your audience is getting what you say.

There is more than that in the book, which makes it a great source for scientists - whom Alan Alda addressed many times in this book - to be aware of their audience, because while science is important, just as important is how science is delivered and the people at all walks of life can actually understand what scientists have found.

Some of my favorite quotes from the book:
- "Communication doesn’t take place because you tell somebody something. It takes place when you observe them closely and track their ability to follow you. Like making a sculpture out of space, communication is a group experience."
- "You picture an audience and think, What are they already aware of? Where should I start? How deep should I go? What are they actually eager to know? If I start too far in, will I be using concepts they don’t really understand?"
- "There’s something about having knowledge that makes it difficult to take the beginner’s view, to be able to think the way you did before you had that knowledge. And unless you’re aware that you actually know something the other person doesn’t know, you can be at a disadvantage. When you forget you know more than they do, there’re a tendency to undervalue your position."
- "I hope they’ll pay attention not so much to the mechanical things, like a sudden change of pace in a talk or a sudden change in volume of their voice. I hope they’ll pay attention, instead, to the fundamental source of that pacing and volume, which is the connection with the other person. That connection makes us respond like a leaf in the breeze to whatever is happening in the faces of those in front of us."