Reviews with content warning for Torture - Queen Charlotte

Reviews tagging 'Torture'

Queen Charlotte by Shonda Rhimes, Julia Quinn

30 reviews

danajoy's review against another edition

emotional reflective

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes

3.75

This is so like the show.
It doesn't have the bridgerton era storyline but outside that it's largely the same.

It was fun to read but I had already watched the series and there was very little added by the novelisation. It was nice to be in the world again.

Content Warnings

reclusivebookslug's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny sad fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

One of my favorite romance novels of the year! I've never read or watched any of the Bridgerton books or shows besides this, but after seeing some clips from the Queen Charlotte show I decided to give this one a try. I don't actually have Netflix, so I can't compare the book to the show at the moment. I've heard that Julia Quinn's writing often leaves something to be desired, but if the main Bridgerton series is anything like this I'll have to give it a try.

A few notes:

The beginning of the book makes a big deal about Charlotte's favorite name being the nickname Lottie, but this is never brought up again.
I wish we got to see a bit more of them figuring out how to live together and be happy with one another. This is always my favorite part of arranged/forced marriage romances.
I don't know how I feel about the ending. I think my opinion would be contingent upon the illness George is supposed to have in this historical fiction account.

Content Warnings

leweylibrary's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional funny fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.25

I do still like the show more, mostly because it also interwove scenes from the Brigerton era we know from the original show, but this was a lot of fun! I love George and Charlotte just as much in print, and I think they did a great job of translating their character into book characters. The chapters were short, and the pace was fast, so I feel like I flew through it. I don't really have any complaints about the book really, it just wasn't like mind blowingly amazing, but still good 🤷‍♀️

Content Warnings

iamamyyyyy's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

I probably would have enjoyed more if I had not watched the Netflix show. The book screams cash grab to me. Except for the very beginning and very end, the book does not jump between timelines like the show which works well for the flow of the book. There is one major plotline from the show that was not in the book. Other than those changes, the book is almost identical to the show down to dialogue, descriptions, and facial expressions. The internal monologue of each character (book told from POV of Charlotte, George, Brimsley, and Agatha) does little to expand on what is well portrayed in the show so ultimately what was the point of this book? It's just a novelization of a script.

Content Warnings

blewballoon's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

I've read all of the Bridgerton books and I do think I liked this better? Maybe? It has more going on than the typical Bridgerton story and I liked that we got perspective chapters from characters outside of the romantic couple, it made the scope of the story bigger and allowed the reader to see the stakes more clearly. I did find the story a bit repetitive and frustrating though.

One of the main plots is that the king "is mad" and has these "episodes" and he hires this super evil sadistic doctor (who literally tortures puppies) and the king repeatedly dismisses and then re-hires this doctor. If something goes well, he dismisses him, at the slightest conflict, he's back to the clearly horrible doctor to get tortured. Apart from that, there are two occasions of either the king or queen overhearing and misinterpreting something the other one said in conversation to the king's mother and then that causing a big conflict that they could have resolved by just telling the other person they overheard and asking what they meant. And they don't EVER talk about it! The queen eventually just gets over what she heard (even though it was taken out of context) and the king never finds out if the queen meant what she said either, she just eventually goes and rescues him from the doctor and he never brings up what he overheard.

I think the Lady Danbury chapters were my favorite, they had a good balance of humor and gravity. I liked the chapters from the perspective of the attendants for the King and Queen

and their little romance

I wish there had been more for them, though. I listened to this on audiobook and I thought the narration was good, but I did speed it up (1.25 I think). I have not watched the corresponding Netflix show yet, I wanted to read the novelization first, but I will say that the intros to the chapters that were like "[Character name][place][time]" reminded me of the headings of scenes in a script.

Content Warnings