Scan barcode
coolfijiwater's review
adventurous
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Confinement, and Torture
Moderate: Suicide, Misogyny, and Incest
tigger89's review
adventurous
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
I'm ashamed to say that it took me many years and two false starts to get around to reading this. I knew it was going to be good, but it was very much a case of "right book, wrong time" for me. I very nearly had to return the copy unread this time as well, but decided I could marathon it over the weekend instead. I'm glad I did, because this book is a classic for a reason.
What everyone knows about this story is that it's the one where the aliens are gender-neutral, except for once a month when they become either male or female — varying from month to month — in order to engage in sexual intercourse. Frankly, in 2023, that's not the most interesting part of this story. I don't know if it's because Seinfeld is Unfunny(tvtropes) or because of our conversations around and understanding of gender evolving, but it doesn't feel terribly groundbreaking. At times, the binary themes even felt regressive, though I understand that they had a different cultural significance in 1969. Rather, what I found to be far more timeless were the cultural misunderstandings and Genly's struggle, first to salvage his mission and then to survive.
Le Guin's descriptions of the various landscapes were incredible. Let me tell you, I felt the wind on that glacier! And her explorations of the cultural institutions — such as Shifgrethor, Kemmer, and the Foretellers — were SF/F at its best. I'd never heard this book praised for its world before and that's a shame, because those who read to experience fantastical lands and cultures unlike our own(hi!) will find plenty to dig into here.
Something that I really struggled with was the extensive use of male-as-neuter language throughout the text. I found it very difficult to remember that the characters were meant to be androgynous when all the pronouns were he/him. Yes, I know the language is a 1969 thing(see also: "bisexual society", which is way less of a party than it sounds). But that doesn't make it any easier on the reader. The edition I read had an afterword by Charlie Jane Anders, in which she proposed the idea that Genly himself is an unreliable narrator of sorts, expressing his own misogyny through his use of male pronouns for the Gethenians. I really liked that idea, and have adopted it as my own headcanon.
What everyone knows about this story is that it's the one where the aliens are gender-neutral, except for once a month when they become either male or female — varying from month to month — in order to engage in sexual intercourse. Frankly, in 2023, that's not the most interesting part of this story. I don't know if it's because Seinfeld is Unfunny(tvtropes) or because of our conversations around and understanding of gender evolving, but it doesn't feel terribly groundbreaking. At times, the binary themes even felt regressive, though I understand that they had a different cultural significance in 1969. Rather, what I found to be far more timeless were the cultural misunderstandings and Genly's struggle, first to salvage his mission and then to survive.
Le Guin's descriptions of the various landscapes were incredible. Let me tell you, I felt the wind on that glacier! And her explorations of the cultural institutions — such as Shifgrethor, Kemmer, and the Foretellers — were SF/F at its best. I'd never heard this book praised for its world before and that's a shame, because those who read to experience fantastical lands and cultures unlike our own(hi!) will find plenty to dig into here.
Something that I really struggled with was the extensive use of male-as-neuter language throughout the text. I found it very difficult to remember that the characters were meant to be androgynous when all the pronouns were he/him. Yes, I know the language is a 1969 thing(see also: "bisexual society", which is way less of a party than it sounds). But that doesn't make it any easier on the reader. The edition I read had an afterword by Charlie Jane Anders, in which she proposed the idea that Genly himself is an unreliable narrator of sorts, expressing his own misogyny through his use of male pronouns for the Gethenians. I really liked that idea, and have adopted it as my own headcanon.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Alcohol, Confinement, Death, Incest, Misogyny, Suicide, and Gun violence
Minor: Pregnancy, Xenophobia, Fire/Fire injury, and Mental illness
imrereads's review against another edition
adventurous
reflective
4.0
Usually I try to not think about which books I "should" read, but sometimes it pays off. This book is an example of that. It was written in 1969, and is considered to kickstart the feminist sci-fi genre. It took me a hot minute to get into this book, but once I did I found not only a good story, but also a very interesting conversation of the effect sex and gender has on culture and society. The setting of the story if the planet of Gethen, were people don't have a fixed sex, and our narrator is from a different planet where they do, so it's very much an outsiders perspective which brings up a lot of interesting conversations.
There are certain things I wish were done differently, particularly the use of he/him pronouns on the Getheran people, and I've since read that Le Guin regretted that decision herself. I think a neutral pronoun would have been a better decision, but I will admit that he/him does tell us something about our narrator and it does make some sense.
All in all I'm very glad I read this book. Not only does it give me some insight into the history of the genre, but it was also a genuinely good reading experience.
There are certain things I wish were done differently, particularly the use of he/him pronouns on the Getheran people, and I've since read that Le Guin regretted that decision herself. I think a neutral pronoun would have been a better decision, but I will admit that he/him does tell us something about our narrator and it does make some sense.
All in all I'm very glad I read this book. Not only does it give me some insight into the history of the genre, but it was also a genuinely good reading experience.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement, Grief, Incest, Blood, and Death
emilo's review
emotional
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Medical trauma, Incest, Torture, and Murder
blazingquill's review
challenging
hopeful
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
This is an older book written in a classical science fiction style - which is to say, sometimes a slog to get through. In addition, while it takes several meaningful steps to deconstruct the gender binary, it does so in a way which is very accessible, and therefore doesn’t push as far at it perhaps could, as Le Guin herself commented on several times.
That being said, it’s a very profound look into the difference between things that are societally decided and things that are innately human, in a way that thoughtfully offers solutions to the world we currently live in rather than just pointing out the bad. (From what I understand, this is often a core tenant of Le Guin’s work, and makes me excited to read more.) At it’s core, despite the way it sometimes reads, it’s a story about friendship and love. The line, “I do not know if we were right,” inflicted psychic damage upon me, and just barely manages to push the heavy queer coding into explicitly queer.
If you have experience reading dense science fiction, and don’t mind it, I would highly recommend.
That being said, it’s a very profound look into the difference between things that are societally decided and things that are innately human, in a way that thoughtfully offers solutions to the world we currently live in rather than just pointing out the bad. (From what I understand, this is often a core tenant of Le Guin’s work, and makes me excited to read more.) At it’s core, despite the way it sometimes reads, it’s a story about friendship and love. The line, “I do not know if we were right,” inflicted psychic damage upon me, and just barely manages to push the heavy queer coding into explicitly queer.
If you have experience reading dense science fiction, and don’t mind it, I would highly recommend.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Xenophobia, Grief, Incest, Misogyny, and Trafficking
Moderate: Torture, Violence, Vomit, and Police brutality
Minor: Murder, Transphobia, and War
barry_x's review
challenging
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I don't know if this reflects on me as a reader or on the book, but after reading I am still not sure if this is a re-read from years ago.
One of my reading challenges this year is to read more speculative fiction that can loosely address LGBTQ themes, have notable LGBTQ characters or if the author isn't cis-het. One of the things I have been struck with is in the space of a month I've read two books which feature non-heterosexual reproduction and I have another one lined up next month (the other books are Ammonite and A Door Into Ocean). This book also counts for another of my reading goals which is to read more fiction by anarchists or books which address anarchism and non-hierarchical forms of living (Ursula Le Guin was a well known anarchist in her lifetime).
This book feels like something I've been looking forward to reading for some time but I have been left a little underwhelmed by it. I kind of feel I have read an important book, but I am not sure I have been entertained, or especially moved by it.
The premise is that an alien called Genly Ai, lands on the planet Gethen with a mission to introduce humanity to Gethen and invite them into the Ekumen, the Ekumen being a non-hierarchical co-ordinating body of human inhabited planets to support trade and the sharing of knowledge, histories and experiences. The planet Gethen is a planet going through a kind of ice age, with the geo-politic dominated by two neighbours Karhide and Orgoreyn in a state of almost Cold war between them with border tensions.
I'm interested in the Ekumen because in the voice of Ai it is nothing but a form of benevolence, there are laws and agreements but the perception is that it is consensual. Ai lands alone in a show of peace, and the Gethenians are invited to join humanity, not colonised or forced. And yet, when we look through the eyes of Ai, it rarely leaves me that there is a sense that Gethen is 'undeveloped' and backward. I also think that Le Guin portrays the fears of Gethen well, but because they are captured through the eyes of Ai, they almost seem irrational. It did make me think, because this could easily be viewed as a novel about colonisation despite all the text saying something different. I think Le Guin is quite clever because so many readings of the Ekumen can be seen as a positive but she allows the voice of the Genthenians to shine. I think I may be giving Le Guin a free pass though, because so much of Ai's voice is critiquing these inhabitants for not knowing what is good for them and I am left with the notion that the Ekumen are colonisers and may standardise humanity rather than celebrate it's diversity.
The other thing I found notable was the not to subtle inferences as to the cultures of the two neighbouring states. Karhide is clearly a monarchy modelled on a parliamentarian nation with significant inequality, whereas Orgoreyn is clearly modelled on an over-officious 'everyone has a job but nothing gets down' communist state, complete with secret police. It's obvious now and would have been more stark then, and I can see Le Guin poking fun at both monarchies with an illusion of governance and communist states.
Le Guin's father was an anthropologist and I think it shows in much of her work. I was reading on a forum this week and one commented that Le Guin is distant from her characters and it resonated with me. One never feels the characters are loved by her as an author, or that she is part of the book. Her writing can be detached, she observes. That distance lets one reflect, and see the bigger picture but I wonder if some of the heart of the story is missing writing this way?
This detachedness, this removal from the characters is important for me, because no matter how insightful the themes are, no matter how beautiful the descriptions are, the reader always feels somewhat like an alien. I guess this puts us in Ai's shoes, but it does make things tricky. Concepts and terminology is introduced but doesn't really get explained - you have to work it out for yourself. Certain things are only explained quite late in the novel. For instance there is the concept of an honour code, of not losing face called shifgrethor. It's never really explained, Ai, the alien does not comprehend it, and so the reader does not either. The concept is loosely based on trade of grace and favour underpinned by manners - I think. The problem was, reading the book, I often checked back thinking I had missed a page, or not paid attention. There is quite a pivotal event that happens to Ai, and I am still not sure I understood why I understood why it happened. I guess this is why I have rated it as only average - reading for pleasure, I shouldn't feel like I am checking back or lost. The first third of the book was a real slog and I just wasn't enjoying it. It's mostly the reputation of the book that kept me going.
I suppose the thing that most people know about this book is it's treatment of gender, and how ground-breaking this book was in 1969. On Gethen humans have not evolved as male or female, they are simply people. In something 'sort of' akin to a menstrual cycle every 20 or so days or so they enter a stage called kemmer. In this state they are not expected to work, but are in a state of sexual arousal and have a need for sexual intimacy. It is portrayed as very much an immediate biological need like eating or sleeping. In the state of kemmer, humans who are effectively in a couple with each other have intimate sexual relations with each other, whilst others go to kemmerhouses where they effectively make love to whoever is there free from ties and obligations. One can see the influence of the free love movement of the sixties here I think!
What's interesting is that when two adults bond in kemmer, one assumes temporarily male physiology and another assumes female physiology and in effect copulate as a heterosexual couple. If the person with female genitalia is pregnant they maintain some female physiology in the course of their pregnancy before reverting back to their androgynous self. What's sad about this book is there is a small acknowledgment of what we would consider same sex attraction where both partners assume male or female genitalia but they are considered perverts. Similarly, fraternal kemmer raises eyebrows as does incest but I kind of feel these are lumped in with what to us looks like non-straight intimacy. I'm not saying the book is homophobic, because in many respects the humans are sexual, without definition, rather than hetero or even bi and I imagine it was such an important book at the time for breaking down gender norms.
Whilst this is interesting, they key point are that first of all the Gethenians think Ai is 'permanently in kemmer' because he has a penis and it's considered distasteful, second, because sexual needs and intimacy needs are treated as a biological need there is no sense of shame, and subsequently it is inferred that sexual violence is non-existent. However, the most important thing is Ai's worldview. He continues to see the Gethenians as male in the absence of another world. He misgenders them throughout the book because he can't imagine another way. And as a reader it tricked me, because quite often I thought of the characters as men, on a planet where women did not exist and I checked myself thinking how easy it is to erase people when we misgender them. Ai was the only man on the planet, everyone else are people.
What this leads to is Ai continually trying to ascribe male and female attributes to characters, particularly the Karhide Prime Minister Estrevan. Estrevan is such an important character in the book as he advocates for the world Ai promises, sees the values of opening up his world.
And I guess this is the heart of the book for me. A significant proportion of the last third of the book is mostly Estrevan and Ai together in their story. This part of the book was beautiful, whether it was the description of the landscapes, the growing love between them, that awareness of intimacy, friendship and support that all good relationships have. It genuinely touched my heart. And finally Ai gets it, he stops seeing Estrevan as either male or female, but just as a whole person in their right. Seeing how some get so tied up in gender constructs now, I am touched by the notion of, 'what if I stop trying to classify, and see someone as their whole self'. It troubles Ai because he realises that Estrevan, or anyone's behaviour can't be ascribed to their gender, but to the person and their character. We are just 'us'
I am glad I read the book, it has relevance to the struggles non cis-het people face today. It just felt like to hard a slog early on to rate any higher.
One of my reading challenges this year is to read more speculative fiction that can loosely address LGBTQ themes, have notable LGBTQ characters or if the author isn't cis-het. One of the things I have been struck with is in the space of a month I've read two books which feature non-heterosexual reproduction and I have another one lined up next month (the other books are Ammonite and A Door Into Ocean). This book also counts for another of my reading goals which is to read more fiction by anarchists or books which address anarchism and non-hierarchical forms of living (Ursula Le Guin was a well known anarchist in her lifetime).
This book feels like something I've been looking forward to reading for some time but I have been left a little underwhelmed by it. I kind of feel I have read an important book, but I am not sure I have been entertained, or especially moved by it.
The premise is that an alien called Genly Ai, lands on the planet Gethen with a mission to introduce humanity to Gethen and invite them into the Ekumen, the Ekumen being a non-hierarchical co-ordinating body of human inhabited planets to support trade and the sharing of knowledge, histories and experiences. The planet Gethen is a planet going through a kind of ice age, with the geo-politic dominated by two neighbours Karhide and Orgoreyn in a state of almost Cold war between them with border tensions.
I'm interested in the Ekumen because in the voice of Ai it is nothing but a form of benevolence, there are laws and agreements but the perception is that it is consensual. Ai lands alone in a show of peace, and the Gethenians are invited to join humanity, not colonised or forced. And yet, when we look through the eyes of Ai, it rarely leaves me that there is a sense that Gethen is 'undeveloped' and backward. I also think that Le Guin portrays the fears of Gethen well, but because they are captured through the eyes of Ai, they almost seem irrational. It did make me think, because this could easily be viewed as a novel about colonisation despite all the text saying something different. I think Le Guin is quite clever because so many readings of the Ekumen can be seen as a positive but she allows the voice of the Genthenians to shine. I think I may be giving Le Guin a free pass though, because so much of Ai's voice is critiquing these inhabitants for not knowing what is good for them and I am left with the notion that the Ekumen are colonisers and may standardise humanity rather than celebrate it's diversity.
The other thing I found notable was the not to subtle inferences as to the cultures of the two neighbouring states. Karhide is clearly a monarchy modelled on a parliamentarian nation with significant inequality, whereas Orgoreyn is clearly modelled on an over-officious 'everyone has a job but nothing gets down' communist state, complete with secret police. It's obvious now and would have been more stark then, and I can see Le Guin poking fun at both monarchies with an illusion of governance and communist states.
Le Guin's father was an anthropologist and I think it shows in much of her work. I was reading on a forum this week and one commented that Le Guin is distant from her characters and it resonated with me. One never feels the characters are loved by her as an author, or that she is part of the book. Her writing can be detached, she observes. That distance lets one reflect, and see the bigger picture but I wonder if some of the heart of the story is missing writing this way?
This detachedness, this removal from the characters is important for me, because no matter how insightful the themes are, no matter how beautiful the descriptions are, the reader always feels somewhat like an alien. I guess this puts us in Ai's shoes, but it does make things tricky. Concepts and terminology is introduced but doesn't really get explained - you have to work it out for yourself. Certain things are only explained quite late in the novel. For instance there is the concept of an honour code, of not losing face called shifgrethor. It's never really explained, Ai, the alien does not comprehend it, and so the reader does not either. The concept is loosely based on trade of grace and favour underpinned by manners - I think. The problem was, reading the book, I often checked back thinking I had missed a page, or not paid attention. There is quite a pivotal event that happens to Ai, and I am still not sure I understood why I understood why it happened. I guess this is why I have rated it as only average - reading for pleasure, I shouldn't feel like I am checking back or lost. The first third of the book was a real slog and I just wasn't enjoying it. It's mostly the reputation of the book that kept me going.
I suppose the thing that most people know about this book is it's treatment of gender, and how ground-breaking this book was in 1969. On Gethen humans have not evolved as male or female, they are simply people. In something 'sort of' akin to a menstrual cycle every 20 or so days or so they enter a stage called kemmer. In this state they are not expected to work, but are in a state of sexual arousal and have a need for sexual intimacy. It is portrayed as very much an immediate biological need like eating or sleeping. In the state of kemmer, humans who are effectively in a couple with each other have intimate sexual relations with each other, whilst others go to kemmerhouses where they effectively make love to whoever is there free from ties and obligations. One can see the influence of the free love movement of the sixties here I think!
What's interesting is that when two adults bond in kemmer, one assumes temporarily male physiology and another assumes female physiology and in effect copulate as a heterosexual couple. If the person with female genitalia is pregnant they maintain some female physiology in the course of their pregnancy before reverting back to their androgynous self. What's sad about this book is there is a small acknowledgment of what we would consider same sex attraction where both partners assume male or female genitalia but they are considered perverts. Similarly, fraternal kemmer raises eyebrows as does incest but I kind of feel these are lumped in with what to us looks like non-straight intimacy. I'm not saying the book is homophobic, because in many respects the humans are sexual, without definition, rather than hetero or even bi and I imagine it was such an important book at the time for breaking down gender norms.
Whilst this is interesting, they key point are that first of all the Gethenians think Ai is 'permanently in kemmer' because he has a penis and it's considered distasteful, second, because sexual needs and intimacy needs are treated as a biological need there is no sense of shame, and subsequently it is inferred that sexual violence is non-existent. However, the most important thing is Ai's worldview. He continues to see the Gethenians as male in the absence of another world. He misgenders them throughout the book because he can't imagine another way. And as a reader it tricked me, because quite often I thought of the characters as men, on a planet where women did not exist and I checked myself thinking how easy it is to erase people when we misgender them. Ai was the only man on the planet, everyone else are people.
What this leads to is Ai continually trying to ascribe male and female attributes to characters, particularly the Karhide Prime Minister Estrevan. Estrevan is such an important character in the book as he advocates for the world Ai promises, sees the values of opening up his world.
And I guess this is the heart of the book for me. A significant proportion of the last third of the book is mostly Estrevan and Ai together in their story. This part of the book was beautiful, whether it was the description of the landscapes, the growing love between them, that awareness of intimacy, friendship and support that all good relationships have. It genuinely touched my heart. And finally Ai gets it, he stops seeing Estrevan as either male or female, but just as a whole person in their right. Seeing how some get so tied up in gender constructs now, I am touched by the notion of, 'what if I stop trying to classify, and see someone as their whole self'. It troubles Ai because he realises that Estrevan, or anyone's behaviour can't be ascribed to their gender, but to the person and their character. We are just 'us'
I am glad I read the book, it has relevance to the struggles non cis-het people face today. It just felt like to hard a slog early on to rate any higher.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Forced institutionalization
Minor: Murder and Incest
thecriticalreader's review
challenging
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Blurb:
Genly Ai is a human envoy from an interstellar organization called Ekumen that coordinates communication, trade, transportation, and cultural exchange between anthropoid planets sent to the planet of Gethen to convince the planet’s government to join Ekumen. Gethen is an extremely cold planet with near-constant wintery weather. Another notable aspect of the planet is that its inhabitants belong to a singular, fluid sex. Their physiology is androgynous and asexual except for when they find themselves in heat, at which point they couple with another person in heat. When coupling, one person’s anatomy and hormones closely resemble that of a human male; the other, that of a human female. Genly Ai struggles as he fights to accomplish his goal on a planet that he finds strange, confusing, and inhospitable.
Review:
The Left Hand of Darkness is a science fiction novel that is often spoken about for its exploration of gender and sex, but it would be unfair to limit one’s assessment of the novel here, because The Left Hand of Darkness also delves into themes of patriotism, war, human nature, and cultural anthropology. The book’s main strengths lie in world-building, philosophical thought, and thematic explorations: since it reads like a cultural anthropology report, Le Guin’s highly imaginative world stands out but remains rather remote from the adventure, unique characterizations, and gripping plots that some expect from the science fiction genre. Nevertheless, she expertly evokes an icy atmosphere, both in terms of Gethen’s physical conditions and in the bewildering incomprehensibility its society presents for Genly Ai. The language and descriptions are so vivid, in fact, that I felt distinctly chilly every time I picked up the book. Although the plot moves slowly and takes place on another world, the story at the book’s center is a very human one.
The book’s imaginative worldbuilding and profound philosophical discussions make it a worthwhile and enjoyable read, but it would be incorrect to call The Left Hand of Darkness a ‘timeless classic,’ as several aspects of its thematic exploration betray it as a product of its time. For one, the book’s concern with the nature of patriotism and war reflects anxieties over America’s division over the Vietnam War, although these discussions still hold relevance today. On the other hand, its central optimism, rather unquestioning faith in institutions of open trade and cultural exchange, and lack of concern surrounding ecological destruction seem rather naïve to a twenty-first-century reader. Similarly, Le Guin’s narrative brushes against but never fully embraces the idea of gender and sex as social constructions, ultimately unable to fully escape a bio-essentialist understanding of gender. Her exclusive use of he/him pronouns to describe the ambisexual Getherians—despite their nonbinary conception of gender—particularly undercuts the impact of her commentary. The Left Hand of Darkness would have certainly been radical in the middle of the second wave of feminism, but now appears rather outdated in the face of subsequent scholarship in the field of gender and sexuality studies.
The Run-Down:
You will probably like The Left Hand of Darkness if:
· You enjoy cerebral, philosophical science fiction in the vein of Star Trek
· You are a fan of cultural anthropologys
You might not like The Left Hand of Darkness if:
· You are looking for an action-packed, adventurous story with fascinating characters
Content Warnings
Graphic: Forced institutionalization
Moderate: Sexism, Death, and Incest
Minor: Pregnancy, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Violence, War, and Miscarriage
finn_1312's review
adventurous
emotional
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: War and Forced institutionalization
Minor: Incest
sylvester749's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
extremely dense, very interesting and well read, found it a little difficult to get into. didn't feel as groundbreaking to me as i thought it would going into it, but that very may be because i read it 54 years after its publication. still, what a galaxy brain and very well explored premise.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Kidnapping and Police brutality
Minor: War, Deportation, Miscarriage, Suicide, Death, and Incest
smolren's review
adventurous
challenging
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
I didn't expect this. I started reading it and thought it was going to be a lot of hard work for little reward, but I was wrong. I'm so grateful to have read about the beautiful friendship at the core of this book.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Forced institutionalization, Injury/Injury detail, and Death
Moderate: Blood, Confinement, and Grief
Minor: Drug abuse, Animal death, Vomit, Incest, Suicide, Misogyny, and Sexual content