Reviews

Bug-Jargal by Victor Hugo

dina_b's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Um jovem Victor Hugo escreve aos 16 anos uma história sobre uma amizade improvável, entre um jovem oficial branco e um rei negro escravizado, tendo como pano de fundo a revolução dos escravos de São Domingos (futuro Haiti) em 1791.
Gostei do passo da história, tem ação, drama e emoção, impossível não gostar do Rei Bug-Jargal.
História de um tempo em que a honra e a palavra contavam muito.

dameguillotine's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Esta nouvelle me parece más valiosa desde su perspectiva histórica-política que desde su habilidad literaria, más en el contexto de la progresión del pensamiento de su autor.
Creo que la combinación de indignación y compasión católicas son muy típicas de Hugo, y se manifiestan más inmaduras en una obra tan temprana. Si demonizados los esclavos rebeldes por sus acciones violentas, no se olvida la novela de justificar sus actos (me pareció particularmente interesante en lo que respecta al enano, que es presentado como poseedor de un alma irremediablemente cruel y vengativa, y descrito por el protagonista como monstruoso, horrible, maldito, pero de quien sin embargo leemos un monólogo que nos lleva a comprender las profundas humillaciones que se ha visto forzado a soportar). El personaje más detestable pienso que es el tío de nuestro narrador, pero Leopoldo se refiere a él casi siempre en términos elogiosos. Bug-Jargal, por el otro lado, es un ejemplo de virtudes: libertador pero no asesino, rebelde pero no violento, y poseedor de una autoridad incuestionable por su noble nacimiento ("hijo del rey del Congo").
La obra en su conjunto tiene una cierta ambiguedad, entonces. La violencia es condenada en su conjunto: como esclavitud, pero también como rebelión, tomada como venganza. En sí es comparable a los modernos movimientos cristianos de noviolencia. Es el ejemplo de Pierrot el que se sugiere- el alzamiento que busca evitar víctimas, la emancipación pacífica o al menos la batalla honrada. No sé que podría esperarse como resultado de la revolución haitiana de perseguirse ese ideal; parafraseando a Robespierre, ¿es posible una revolución sin revolución?
Esta perspectiva noviolenta también se repite en el desprecio hacia las figuras del 91, además de a los esclavos de Santo Domingo. La palabra ciudadano es prácticamente una parodia, esperable para el Hugo de la década del 20. El mismo final reivindica a nuestro narrador como aristócrata y héroe nacional frente al odio vengativo y absurdo de los portadores del gorro frigio.

En fin, interesante. Una obra que, con los sucesos de Haití bastante cercanos, busca enaltecer a un héroe negro, denunciando los horrores del sistema esclavista y los de la violencia revolucionaria de una misma vez.

Posdata, no puedo dejar de mencionar la relación casi homoerótica entre Leopoldo y Bug-Jargal. Supongo que debe ser entendida como puramente fraternal, tomando en cuenta el amor de ambos por María, pero María aparece más bien poco (encantador personaje, por cierto).

alesia_karch's review

Go to review page

adventurous fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

authorjbr's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

First person makes Hugo's tangents much more tolerable, and the epilogue casts a whole new light on the story. Mildly racist, but not nearly as bad as some material from this time. Right up there next to Les Miserables.

viviuhler's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ryleesakis's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

bro thought he ended racism with this one

borealis85's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A great adventure in the context of slavery and the haitian revolution.

santino1215's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Book 54 out of 200 books
"Bug-Jargal" by Victor-Marie Hugo

"Bug-Jargal" is one of Victor Hugo's earlier novels, depicting the racial injustice near and during the Haitian revolution. The book follows the story of Aristocrat Leopold d'Auverney as he marries his cousin Marie, in the island where the revolution takes place. Meanwhile, Pierot, a slave and later the leader of the revolutionaries, fell in love with Marie, but because of their racial differences, Pierot, mid-way through the novel, kidnaps Marie for himself.

"Bug-Jargal" is a story not only of Revolution and the fight for equality, but a tale of love, hope, tragedy and most importantly, friendship.

MY THOUGHTS:
I was on a Victor Hugo marathon from October to November 2021, and I've got to say that it was fun. The nature of this story hits like home because the Philippines itself was fighting for its independence against the Spaniards, for we just wanted to be as equal as the Spaniards. But even in modern day, equality still is a subject of debate, considering the skin/racial discrimination of ethnic minorities is in my country.

"Bug-Jargal" is the story of the revolutionary age. Throughout the course of the 204-paged novel (Project Gutenberg edition), we can say that both races have a lot of conflicts, only to be resolved in such a bloody manner. While I can't blame d'Auverney for being pompous, Pierot wasn't exactly a good character either because he threatened his friend. Though I felt happy because he sacrificed himself in the end for Napoleon and d'Auverney.

A great book, an underrated one as well.

lindorie's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Ce livre, quand je l’ai vu, m’a intrigué parce que je n’en avais jamais entendu parler et que j’étais curieuse de le découvrir car c’est le premier que Hugo a écrit suite à un pari, à l’âge de 16 ans. De ce fait, on retrouve une plume encore jeune mais dont la beauté est déjà présente et savoureuse. L’histoire elle, se place dans le contexte de la révolte des esclaves de Saint-Domingue en 1791. Le texte, vibrant de colère, montre la tyrannie coloniale et la puissance vengeresse des révoltés et laisse aussi entrevoir la cruauté des esclaves incarnée par le chef des rebelles Biassou. Comme je m’y attendais, le racisme de l’époque et du narrateur, est présent notamment dans le langage employé mais aussi -à ma grande surprise- dans les idées. Trop souvent le narrateur maudit les esclaves et les méprise. Tout cela, même mis sur le compte de l’époque, me rend perplexe quant à la position de Hugo. En effet, il peint autant de scènes poignantes et révolutionnaires que de scènes mettant en avant la cruauté des esclaves, plaçant ainsi les colons en victimes. Il y avait peut-être là plus une volonté de parler de la révolte dans son contexte, sans prendre de position, je ne sais pas. Quand bien même, le racisme omniprésent et l’image négative des esclaves ont rendu cette lecture insoutenable. Autre déception concernant ce livre : Bug-Jargal, qui donne quand même son nom à l’œuvre, n’est pas le personnage principal. (J'imagine que cela aurait choqué à l'époque mais si ce livre dénonçait l’esclavage, donner voix à un esclave-narrateur aurait sans doute eu plus d’effet.) Pleins d'éléments comme celui-ci me laisse penser que le but n'était définitivement pas de prendre position mais de parler de la révolte sous tous ses aspects, y compris en évoquant la rage et la soif de sang qui animent les esclaves après avoir connu les horreurs de l’esclavage. Malgré tout, cette œuvre me plonge dans une confusion évidente.

jersy's review

Go to review page

4.0

This book made me feel a bit uncomfortable and I think in this case it's a good thing. It is written from the POV of someone very much of his time and while he, at his time, might be seen as a good person and doesn't like the cruelty against slaves, he is still very flawed, seeing these people as less than him and only manages to respect one of them after extreme acts of kindness. Whenever the former slaves spoke, I saw how the author portrays their feelings and motives very sympatheticly, however since the narrator others and despises them, the racism shown will be just too much for some readers. The edition I read had been edited by the author later in life but he wrote it at 16, and I think some aspects would have been handled better by an older Victor Hugo, but I could still respect the intention and already very impressive writing of this debut.
With that out of the way, it was a really compelling story and I kind of like narratives told in flashback. It was a window into the past and I just enjoy the author's prose a lot.