Scan barcode
bibliobethreads's review against another edition
2.0
This book tells the story of four children - Edward, Humphrey, Alice and Edith, whose distinguished father Colonel Beverley is killed during the English Civil War while fighting the cause of King Charles and as a result, they become orphaned. An old forester, Jacob Armitage, whilst walking in the woods one days hears a group of men fighting against the king aka Roundheads forging a plan to set fire to Colonel Beverley's mansion, burning everything within, meaning that the children are in mortal danger. He immediately sets out to the grand house to warn the children's aunt and guardian, who refuses to leave the property. He manages to persuade her that he should take the children however, and raise them as his own grand-children while teaching them the ways of the forest so they may be able to provide for themselves whilst concealing their identities. This is due to the king having fled, and Cromwell having England under his thumb. If the children's identities are revealed, it could be incredibly dangerous for them. The children pass some happy years in this manner with the love and tutelage of the old man, until he dies, and the children have to learn to survive on their own.
To be honest, when I started this book, I had a bit of trouble understanding how children could enjoy it. The subject matter seemed slightly too complex, and there are not many what I call "major action sequences." In fact, not much goes on of much interest, apart from a few fairly exciting hunting expeditions. It was almost what I can imagine the children of Narnia's lives to be like minus the war, wardrobe and talking animals. There are some interesting characters, Pablo their adopted gypsy boy was quite entertaining, along with the villain of the piece whose vendetta against the Edward I quite enjoyed and the adorable old forester Jacob Armitage. Disappointedly, the female characters seem like non-entities, with not much to say for themselves which is a shame. Not that this book is all bad... the historical element is very intriguing, and I wouldn't mind learning more about this period of history. As a classic piece of children's literature however, I think there were MUCH better books written around this time.
Please see my full review at http://www.bibliobeth.wordpress.com
To be honest, when I started this book, I had a bit of trouble understanding how children could enjoy it. The subject matter seemed slightly too complex, and there are not many what I call "major action sequences." In fact, not much goes on of much interest, apart from a few fairly exciting hunting expeditions. It was almost what I can imagine the children of Narnia's lives to be like minus the war, wardrobe and talking animals. There are some interesting characters, Pablo their adopted gypsy boy was quite entertaining, along with the villain of the piece whose vendetta against the Edward I quite enjoyed and the adorable old forester Jacob Armitage. Disappointedly, the female characters seem like non-entities, with not much to say for themselves which is a shame. Not that this book is all bad... the historical element is very intriguing, and I wouldn't mind learning more about this period of history. As a classic piece of children's literature however, I think there were MUCH better books written around this time.
Please see my full review at http://www.bibliobeth.wordpress.com
stagasaurus's review against another edition
2.0
Gosh this needed editing. It assume there are edited versions out there. But I heard it in the original glory with all the racism, sexism, snobbery, and boring boring detail left in. The action was unbearably slow. The dialogue unbelievable.
Spoiler I don't care how oldy worldy you are, if your dog is injured, you don't waffle on for five minutes before checking on him.
I don't think ponies left all night in snow drifts with their legs tied together normally live to tell the tale.
At least Pablo got a cottage out of it.
This is exactly the sort of book I would normally enjoy. But it was utterly tedious.
Spoiler I don't care how oldy worldy you are, if your dog is injured, you don't waffle on for five minutes before checking on him.
I don't think ponies left all night in snow drifts with their legs tied together normally live to tell the tale.
At least Pablo got a cottage out of it.
This is exactly the sort of book I would normally enjoy. But it was utterly tedious.
amandapayne's review against another edition
4.0
Solid 4.5! By 9yo son is helping with this review. He liked the time period, that the kids had to figure out how to live in the forest, and he enjoyed the characters themselves. Read it for our curriculum- AmblesideOnline. It’s a good read!
heatherwoodauthor's review against another edition
5.0
What a wonderful story. I think this was the most advanced language of any read aloud we've done yet, but we all really enjoyed it. Definitely recommend.
charlottebreads's review against another edition
adventurous
lighthearted
medium-paced
3.75
- i love the atmosphere in this book
- very similar to "the little house on the prairie"
- very similar to "the little house on the prairie"
kefletcher's review against another edition
5.0
History Year Three. Reformation from the view of Catholic siblings. Great food for thought from our Protestant perspective.
nightskiesdark's review against another edition
3.0
This isn't really Children of the New Forest, it's really the eldest son's story - Edward. The two youngest daughters have little personality, and the other son, whilst at least given a personality and something to do, is not the main focus.
I enjoyed this as a child, but it hasn't kept it's charm. The end of the book seems rushed, with about 4 years crammed into a few pages. I would have been more interested to know more about Edwards time fighting.
I probably won't re-read this.
I enjoyed this as a child, but it hasn't kept it's charm. The end of the book seems rushed, with about 4 years crammed into a few pages. I would have been more interested to know more about Edwards time fighting.
I probably won't re-read this.
beautifulminutiae's review against another edition
adventurous
slow-paced
2.0
Honestly, this book was so boring for most of it. The ending was satisfying and I was invested for the last few chapters, but overall I found it so disappointing.
jane_pendragon's review
adventurous
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5