Reviews

Esau by Philip Kerr

ajentzen's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I DNF this book. I wanted to like it so bad. I got to page 170 and then gave up. Nothing suspenseful happened. It was SOOO boring…

monal8822's review

Go to review page

adventurous informative
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

3.5

captain_coffee_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I've certainly not read many like it. It's a great book but I felt as though the action fell a bit short.

modeste's review

Go to review page

3.0

3,7

Wie Philip Kerr zegt, denkt waarschijnlijk in eerste instantie Bernie Gunther. De cynische detective die zijn raadsels oplost tegen de achtergrond van het nazisme en waarbij vaak historische figuren opduiken.

Minder gekend is dat Philip Kerr ook een aantal boeken schreef buiten de Gunther-reeks. Ik las eerder al "Het gebouw", wat mij niet echt overtuigde. De verhaallijn waarin een door AI bestierd gebouw zijn bezoekers vakkundig uit de weg ruimt ("De Lift" gezien mijnheer Kerr?) kon hoewel het uitgangspunt leuk is, mij maar matig bekoren in zijn uitwerking.

Maar Kerr is bij Bernie gewoonweg te goed om hem geen tweede kans te gunnen buiten de BG-reeks.

Ditmaal gaf ik "Esau" een kans (niet te vinden op "Goodreads" in zijn Nederlandse vertaling): een queeste naar de mythe van de Yeti a.k.a. verschrikkelijke sneeuwman. En de gevoelens zijn een beetje gemengd...Ondanks de grondige research die ongetwijfeld werd gedaan, blijf ik het een beetje "slechts een spannend jongensavonturenboek" vinden.

Kerr verliest ook een beetje de pedalen (eigenlijk moet ik stijgijzers zeggen) als er op het einde toch wel wat plotwendingen komen waar ik het moeilijk mee heb. Een ex-advocaat die zichzelf heruitvindt als spirituele swami (yeah right). Een ontraceerbare spionagesatelliet in een verborgen vallei? Vraag me niet niet waarom (ik heb vb. hoegenaamd geen probleem met gasvormige aliens in de Andromeda-nevel die een inval op "good old earth" beramen) maar om een of andere reden pakt de mayonaise niet als Kerr de mythe van de yeti op die manier tot leven wil wekken. Overigens werd er wel behoorlijk leentje-buur gespeeld bij Diane Fossey, daar waar de yeti's nogal wat gorilla-achtige trekjes vertonen.... Was onderhoudend, maar kan niet tippen aan Bernie...

dmahanty's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Kind of a slow start... a little too technical but then the adventure began and sped up the story.

niggola's review

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

2.5

jeremyhornik's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Pretty dumb. I kept thinking, really? A yeti? I'm good with fantasy but somehow the intrusion of a yeti into a technothriller was just too goofy for me. Also, I had trouble telling all the secondary characters apart... including the villain, which is a problem.

Bernie Gunther convinced me to pick this up (thrift store style) but that cynical German bastard sold me a bill of goods.

ninabellisario's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

smcleish's review

Go to review page

2.0

Originally published on my blog here in March 2003.

A Himalayan climbing accident leads Jack Furness to discover a humanoid skull in a mountain cave - the first uncontestable evidence for the existence of the Yeti. When he returns to the States, he gives it to a friend and occasional lover who also happens to be a researcher into human evolution. This is Swift's big chance for academic fame, so she begins investigating the skull and putting together a grant application for an expedition to the Himalayas. Partly because of the secrecy with which she needs to surround her work with to prevent her breakthrough being stolen, and partly because of tension between India and Pakistan making Nepal an unsafe place to visit, her application is initially turned down. But the tension also makes the CIA keen to introduce an agent into the area, and so, without Swift's knowledge, pressure is brought for the decision to be reverse and for an agent (who is also a scientist in a relevant field - a useful coincidence for the benefit of the plot) is told to apply to be part of the team.

The yeti hunt side of the novel - which provides the title, the Yeti being equated with Esau in the Biblical story - is quite well done, and is reminiscent of stories like The Lost World or the film Jurassic Park. (One of the quotes on the back compares Kerr to Michael Crichton, writer of the story which became that film, but Kerr is a much more satisfying writer - there is more to him than a series of moderately interesting ideas.) Such a hunt in the Himalayas has in itself enough potential danger and interest to make a worthwhile subject for a thriller without the political element introduced here, and the activities of the CIA agent seem to me to detract from Esau as a whole. In fact, the whole of the second half of the novel is a disappointment, after the build up to and the early part of the expedition. If Esau had continued to live up to the promise of its first half, it would have been an excellent thriller, but the implausible politics make it unsatisfying.

traveller1's review

Go to review page

3.0

A fun and enjoyable read, a modern take on the Yeti of the Himalayas. An American adventurer stumbles across a yeti skull, and subsequently leads an expedition to uncover the truth about the yeti. The CIA is involved, towards the end of the novel we learn that a downed spy sat crashed in the yeti living space, and that it must be recovered. Intrigue and violence ensue.

The story tells of climbing, a bit of science, and is entertaining. It is well constructed, logical in development, and an easy read. The one negative is the manner in which the female scientist (the smartest person on the expedition) is treated. A rather stale bunch of sexual banter.