You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
wildatheart1339's review against another edition
4.5
Graphic: Deadnaming, Misogyny, Sexism, and Dysphoria
Moderate: Emotional abuse, Homophobia, Panic attacks/disorders, Transphobia, Outing, Gaslighting, and Classism
Minor: Suicidal thoughts and Stalking
readandfindout's review against another edition
3.75
Themes: 4 stars
Characters: 4 stars
Plot: 3.5 stars
Graphic: Deadnaming, Misogyny, Transphobia, Gaslighting, and Dysphoria
Moderate: Body shaming, Homophobia, Panic attacks/disorders, Lesbophobia, Outing, Sexual harassment, and Classism
Minor: Suicidal thoughts and Stalking
sammymilfort's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Body shaming, Deadnaming, Hate crime, Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Blood, Gaslighting, Sexual harassment, and Dysphoria
mels_reading_log's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Deadnaming
Moderate: Homophobia, Misogyny, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, and Gaslighting
novella42's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.75
I read and loved A Lady for A Duke, an original love story with a transfemme protagonist who used the chaos of Waterloo to escape her old life. That book had many of the same elements of this one, and I don't suppose it's fair to compare the very different stories. But there was something especially effective about setting this in the framework of a classic that gave it an extra kick.
There's just something about writing this particular story within that of a familiar, famous character in a time period where gender roles were even more rigid than they are today. It was powerful to read the dysphoria and euphoria of Oliver's internal experience, set against the backdrop of all our expectations that come with the story of Pride and Prejudice.
Jane Austen's version of Elizabeth Bennett has become a very particular kind of role model for femininity and for a certain kind of feminist, and that framework provided a kind of fuel to the fire of this story. Over the course of the book I became acutely aware of nuances of my own social programming and emotional baggage I brought to the story. It was a relief to acknowledge them and let them go.
Oliver's discomfort and constant pain was visceral but gracefully depicted. Seeing his happiness at even the smallest affirmation was a profound relief and a joy to read.
Highly recommend this.
Graphic: Body horror, Body shaming, Deadnaming, Homophobia, Misogyny, Transphobia, Gaslighting, Sexual harassment, and Dysphoria
Moderate: Suicidal thoughts, Outing, and Classism
Minor: Bullying
roseleebooks's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
5.0
Graphic: Deadnaming, Homophobia, Sexism, Transphobia, Outing, Gaslighting, and Dysphoria
angel__'s review against another edition
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.75
However there is one thing I didn't really believe -
Right now it's a ⭐⭐⭐⭐.75 with potential for 5 stars - maybe I'll raise it later
Graphic: Deadnaming, Transphobia, and Dysphoria
Moderate: Homophobia, Sexism, Lesbophobia, and Outing
Minor: Stalking and Gaslighting
fromjuliereads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
I think this didn't work for me for a few reasons, but mainly the book didn't have enough space to really delve into the big themes, I don't think a lot of YA works for me anymore, and as an Austen fan, there were some things changed that I really struggled with and bothered me throughout the book. I don't want to focus on the small things - but little things like saying Gracechurch is in the country, kind of irked me, since that is a real place in London... Could have picked a different place. Or that everyone calls each other by only their last names - no Mr. or Ms., which would have been rude and improper. I think this was an attempt to modernize... But I digress.
The one piece that really bothered me is that in order to delve into the themes of transphobia and dysmorphia, the author took away all of the feminism that Austen imbues into her works. This was a time when feminism wasn't quite a thing, yet having your heroines make these decisions for themselves despite their circumstances, push for marriages of love instead of marriages of convenience, and push the boundaries of female propriety were the acts of rebellion and feminism that women had at the time. This book somehow did the complete opposite. While we definitely have pieces true to the story - where Oliver makes decisions to stay true to himself, and finds the support of his family to live a life that makes him happy and content - there are these conversations that are not only against all society rules but are just incredibly... awful. I get what the author was trying to do, truly, but it just continually irked me. There would be multiple scenes with characters saying things that were really unhelpful to the story and kind of... out of character as well.
For example, there is a part where Mr. Wickham (and yes, he will always be referred to as MR. Wickham) makes rude comments about Oliver's body - commenting on the femininity and "child-bearing" which would have been the height of impropriety at that time. Another scene between them, Mr. Wickham says: "Nonsense. You have some unrealistic fantasies of the future, certainly, but what young girl doesn't hold fanciful notions? It is a weakness of your sex to struggle to differentiate between flights of fantasy and reality. All the more reason why you need a strong husband to guide you." ....... "Insult you!" Wickham looked aghast by the suggestion. "Quite the opposite. Why, I'm here because I think you're beautiful, and more importantly, interesting. I'm certain you'll make a diverting wife for a husband of superior intellect."
Look, I am not a Mr. Wickham apologist, but even this is beyond his character... while he might have thought some of these things, he doesn't say them out loud. His character is all charm and proper.
Anyways, overall, I just wish some of these scenes had been handled... differently. It felt unnecessary to add these in some way when this book could have been much more empowering for well, everyone.
As I mentioned, I am incredibly glad this book does exist, and if it makes people interested in Austen or they can better see themselves through this queer representation of Austen, then I am all for it! I just wasn't the intended audience I think.
Moderate: Transphobia
Minor: Bullying, Homophobia, Misogyny, Gaslighting, and Alcohol
peroxide_princes's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Bullying, Deadnaming, Homophobia, Misogyny, Transphobia, Gaslighting, Dysphoria, and Classism
Moderate: Emotional abuse, Incest, Panic attacks/disorders, Stalking, and Outing
mirandyli's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Graphic: Deadnaming, Homophobia, Sexism, Suicidal thoughts, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, Lesbophobia, Outing, Gaslighting, Dysphoria, and Classism