Scan barcode
noemie_0612's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
The last part
Graphic: Chronic illness, Medical content, Mental illness, and Death
dolores153's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Gaslighting, Mental illness, Self harm, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Medical content, and Medical trauma
Moderate: Racism, Death, Toxic relationship, and Terminal illness
Minor: Death of parent, Xenophobia, Cancer, and Classism
appled303's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Chronic illness, Mental illness, and Gaslighting
Moderate: Classism, Mental illness, Chronic illness, Terminal illness, and Cancer
m_a_j's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Cancer, Death, and Mental illness
Moderate: Classism
lizzym126's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Chronic illness, Death, Gaslighting, Terminal illness, Forced institutionalization, Confinement, Mental illness, and Sexism
Moderate: Death of parent, Emotional abuse, Grief, Toxic relationship, Cancer, and Medical content
emlibe's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Mental illness and Terminal illness
ktboyle's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Moderate: Mental illness and Terminal illness
honeybeewitched87's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Death of parent, Xenophobia, Gaslighting, Misogyny, Death, Grief, and Mental illness
Minor: Alcohol
kellyofcali's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Moderate: Confinement, Medical content, Chronic illness, Death, Forced institutionalization, Mental illness, and Terminal illness
Minor: Alcohol
shelby1994's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
- The Big Short
- #WomenInSTEM
- Your anarchist boyfriend phase - a true universal experience of womanhood
“I most emphatically do not want more perspectives, more opinions. This is to be my story.”
Ah yes, it was only a matter of time before I got to a Pulitzer winner that gave me nightmares about Algebra II class.
Diaz braided together 4 accounts of the illusive Rask family - paragons of Gatsby-era wealth, notorious for refusing to socialize out in public. As their family’s fortunes skyrocket, rumors rush through NYC about who the Rask’s really are, and if they have the country’s best influences at heart.
Because, you know, billionaires obviously always do.
The “book within a book within a book” scaffolding made This very much feel like a 2010s book. The first and final thirds were enrapturing, with a slump in the middle because MATH. This is probably one of the more challenging Pulitzers I’ve picked up just due to so much of the central mystery revolving around the stock market and economic theory, and mens’ fucking up of said economic theory.
At my book club last night, we all propagandized for our fave book we read this year, and this came up more than once. I think the smart girlies will love this, and if any of you want to come help me with my stock portfolio godbless.
Graphic: Mental illness