I really wanted to like this book - I loved Circe and Song of Achilles and this was marketed as a feminist retelling of a Greek myth. It took me forever to read because it felt like such a chore, and I initially rated it 2 stars because I think I may have been influenced by how relieved I was that it was over. Since completion, however, I keep thinking about how much I hated it so I adjusted my rating. More specifically, I keep forgetting that I’m not done with it and feel a deep annoyance that I have to care about these characters, and then feel so relieved to remember that it’s done. I really liked Ariadne’s sister, Phaedra, for the first half of the book. She was a really strong character and was interesting, which is not something that could be said for any other character. UNTIL she had the most bizarre character arch I’ve ever encountered that completely ruined her. I understand that this is the retelling of a myth and truthfully I’m not familiar with the og story, but either way - if you’re writing a “feminist retelling,” wouldn’t it be prudent to add in or alter details that preserve the character you’re creating? Rather than just deciding to let your character go totally against every inclination she’d had up until that point, ignoring the long lost sister she’d pined over and falling in love with a man? Child? and then immediately killing herself when she’s rejected. Ariadne herself is two demential and passive for the entirety of the book. She has compassion for other women, where I guess is how the author stumbles into a feminism tag, but takes so little action to do anything for any of them. She’s a devoted mother, and oblivious to every indiscretion her god husband commits on the island he’s trapped her on. She doesn’t even ask to leave, or get info about her beloved sister, or mother, or father; nope, she’s content to just turn a blind eye to the women who live on the island as a safe haven while watching them wash blood out of their skirts and perform terrifying rituals without appearing to communicate with them in any way about it. There were strings of a sympathetic retelling of Medusa strewn throughout the whole book, and Ariadne was passionately pro-Medusa every time it was brought up. This obviously isn’t a new story the author came up with - Medusa has been portrayed as a victim rather than a villain often before this novel. Anyway I’m bringing it up now because what is Ariadne’s fate?? (This spoils the whole book so don’t read if you care), she is turned to stone by Medusa’s head at the will of a spiteful goddess. Yes that’s correct, pitting women against women. And the only reason Ariadne was even in this weird, ill-conceived battle at all was because she was worried for her children. The whole thing was just so poorly executed. This story was also told in first person, with inconsistently altering perspectives of Ariadne and Phaedra, both of whom you’ll recognize as characters who ended up dying in the book. There is no explanation about how this narrative is possible, presumably the author just could not think of a way to trick the reader into feeling any sort of compassion about them without the stories being written in their (nearly identical) voices. I didn’t enjoy this book. I am hoping writing this review will allow me to move on with my life in peace so I’m no longer tortured with thinking about any of these characters for a second longer.