Reviews with content warning for Racial slurs - The Grapes of Wrath

Reviews tagging 'Racial slurs'

The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck

32 reviews

rustedtrains's review against another edition

dark emotional hopeful informative reflective sad tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Like all Steinbeck novels, the technical skill cannot be questioned - it is wonderful in that sense. His descriptive ability is second to none, no one is arguing otherwise - at least not to me. However, given that Steinbeck took the notes for this book from Sanora Babb’s Whose Names Are Unknown, it changes the whole tone for me from that of an earnest attempt at portraying an issue he cares a lot about - which, I am sure, given the foreword that he did, to an extent, care! - to something a little… I don’t know. The fact that he never once mentions her even before he dies is upsetting. He used her lived experience to write this book because he felt the ends justified the means of getting it out there, and sure. To some extent I agree. But didn’t she deserve a chance to do that, too, in her own words first? It just doesn’t feel right, and takes away from the whole experience for me. I plan on reading her book as well, because I’ve heard comparatively The Grapes of Wrath reads rather stale because of the lack of having lived it.

Content Warnings

sundayfever's review

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

This read much faster than I expected given how long it is. Interesting and made me reflect. The core issues around class, poverty and respect for the land are still issues today, despite the age of this book.

Content Warnings

hannahsutherland's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

This is a piece of history. You can tell that the social issues portrayed in the book were really close to Steinbeck's heart. His passion comes through very clearly. Alternating chapters between the main narrative and more informative chapters made this book very informative.

At first I found the book slow and it took me a little while to connect with the characters, but once I did, I was sucked in.

At first I felt like the book ended quite suddenly, but the more I think about it, the more the ending makes sense.

Content Warnings

kristiniad's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Content Warnings

traingossip's review

Go to review page

challenging emotional inspiring reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? N/A
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

favourite book. An excellent look at the great depression which alternates between a close up journey of a family, as they try to survive the economic and social hardship of the dust bowl, and sermons, which contextualise the events and systems experienced by the characters in the broader societal and economic structures that enforces these. How anyone can read the deeply passionate and empathetic words of Steinbeck and not be affected is beyond me.

Content Warnings

menomica's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

We can’t depend on it. The bank—the monster has to have profits all the time. It can’t wait. It’ll die. No, taxes go on. When the monster stops growing, it dies. It can’t stay one size.

Reading this book made me fall out of love with reading. It made me give up my no dnf goal for the year. It’s not a bad story, and John Steinbeck is a good storyteller in his own right, but he definitely is not a good writer. I do like the way he portrays events effecting the Joads as effecting the rest of the migrants into California; the only problem is he is just really bad at prose and syntax.
Also, in the words of femkereindeer, I never want to read this man talk about a woman’s body ever again, thank you very much. Like my god, this is so creepily horny for all the female characters in this book, or very weirdly sexualizes them.
I think it’s weird how this book got flack for being communist propaganda when it was literally just like «poor ppl got fuck over domestically because of capitalist practices that denied ppl access to basic needs like food and shelter, not because of lack of access but because of lack of capital» which is, exactly what happened!
Tom was kinda funny cause he really would just say whatever and not give a fuck. Love that for him.

Content Warnings

ethrbo's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

surdiablo's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional hopeful reflective sad tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

This was my first fully fledged novel Steinbeck novel and honestly, I had my doubts. Sure, I loved The Pearl and Of Mice and Men but they were novellas, and I wasn't sure if he could keep me enthralled in its entirety when it comes to a 500+ page novel. I am happy to say he actually pulled that off, and it was really impressive considering half of the book is about a

'road trip'

while the other half mainly involves

people moving around and working in farms.

Those are generally not the most exciting events for me to read about, but somehow this one was a page-turner. It was a ruminative experience, something so poignant yet hopeful at the same time. Not sure if I can do justice to this book with my thoughts ( might edit this review later ), but I can't talk further without getting into spoilers as well so feel free to stop reading here if you mind those.

So Grapes of Wrath focuses on the Great Depression and the mass migration that happened during that era. We read about the Joads family embarking on such a long journey towards California after losing their land and the several hardships faced by them during and after the aforementioned journey. It's definitely one of the most immersive novels I have ever read, since as I felt as if I was with them throughout the whole time, witnessing everything first-hand, sharing their pain. The prose is nothing short of amazing ( ofc it's bloody Steinbeck we are talking about so that was never in question! ) and everything just felt so raw and real. I have never empathized with a family so swiftly and wholeheartedly like I did in this novel, and I think Steinbeck nails the characterization, dialogue and atmosphere in such a way that even the people that appeared for a short time managed to instill such a keen sense of sadness in me due to how real it felt. I never really cried at any part ( which is extremely rare when it comes to books anyway ) but there were several moments that left me either shocked or devastated, like when

the Joad family left Wilsons behind, Preacher's sudden brutal death, the ending itself which felt a bit weird at first, but fitting if you ask me now considering what it truly conveys.

I liked the biblical parallels, and regardless of how depressing things were, there was always light at the end of the tunnel. Tom, Ma Joad and Preacher were my favorite characters and the strength and iron-will exuded by Ma Joad throughout the story is nothing short of inspiring. The ending is a bit abrupt for sure and makes you wonder

what happened to everyone after, but I think that's intentional and apt. Did the Joads survive or did they starve to death? How can they possibly survive winter without money and food? We do not know. They are just one family like the hundred thousand others remaining stuck there without any financial means. But they will always help each other no matter what ( Except for Al perhaps, screw that horny boy! 😄). I think both Tom and Rose of Sharon's arcs help to move us from caring about Joads family only to the plight of everyone in general.

Tom's arc was also great considering

the novel pretty much started with him and the preacher, and he eventually follows the road paved by the latter.

The only thing I would consider as a drawback ( which personally isn't a drawback for me since I find it powerful and it fits the theme very well ) is that the somewhat 'meta commentary' can occasionally feel a bit heavy-handed. I can see people considering this book simply a tirade against Capitalism or as Communist propaganda only, but I think there's more to it than all that. For me it's about the everlasting hope and persistence, that innate goodness within us, helping people even during our worst moments ( signified further by that ending ). It also shines light upon how hard people suffered back then, how hard refugees these days may suffer, and how easily they can be dehumanized ( I feel like we could always use more empathy when it comes to these matters in general anyway ). Steinbeck acted as a voice for those unfortunate souls back then, and considering the current affairs, it remains eternally relevant. This quote below is a favorite of mine and conveys the message way better than I ever could.

"Fear the time when the bombs stop falling while the bombers live—for every bomb is proof that the spirit has not died. And fear the time when the strikes stop while the great owners live—for every little beaten strike is proof that the step is being taken. And this you can know—fear the time when Manself will not suffer and die for a concept, for this one quality is the foundation of Manself, and this one quality is man, distinctive in the universe."

I think it's safe to say this novel is gonna stay in my mind for a while.. Can't wait to read East of Eden one day but I will get to Cannery Row and other novellas before that, saving the best for last.

Content Warnings

readerette's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

This book is pretty immersive, and despite the heavy use of phonically-spelled dialogue, it was a smooth read. It was easy to feel empathy for the families who had to do what they could to escape the Dust Bowl.

The ending really threw me. I get perhaps an allegory of giving life to something dying but not dead yet, and a continuation of the book theme of these traveling families sharing what they had even when they truly had nothing by most measures, but the specifics are activating my sense of wrongness, for sure. Perhaps mostly because I wonder if a non-male author would have chosen the same action to convey the intended message.

Much too long. Every other chapter is more about broader societal conditions or other families besides the Joads, and I skimmed most of that without feeling like I missed much. People who like lots of detail will probably enjoy reading more closely. I definitely gathered some interesting context from the "extra" chapters, but I didn't need as much as there was.

This story has aged less poorly than other classics I've read, though it's also not that old. Period-typical racism and sexism, including use of the n-word and mention of domestic abuse.

Content Warnings

gabriella_'s review

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional inspiring sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.75

God, what a great read.
Let me start with the problems.

I have some critiques. First - I felt like it didn’t capture the breadth of displaced Americans for the time. Second - It was very white-centric and seemed to buy into Manifest Destiny shit. I take major issue with both of these. These are my narrative issues

Clearly not as pressing but the pacing at point was inconsistent and dragged on. But I know at points that was the point.

Now the pros.
I really loved the way Ma and Tom were characterized throughout. The family relations at points felt complex. There were really moving moments throughout, and great commentary that’s still relevant now.

Content Warnings

More...