Scan barcode
mickraine's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Confinement, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Violence, Vomit, Grief, Religious bigotry, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship, Bullying, Child abuse, Gore, Gun violence, Miscarriage, Physical abuse, Sexual assault, Torture, Excrement, Medical content, Abortion, Suicide attempt, and Abandonment
Minor: Homophobia, Rape, Toxic relationship, Blood, Death of parent, and War
sunshinestark's review against another edition
3.0
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Drug use, Sexual assault, Torture, Blood, Vomit, Kidnapping, and Injury/Injury detail
dwejra's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
2.0
At first, the story seems great, but the moment Gretchen becomes possessed the book took a turn to the worst. While having a gripping, fast-paced style, the second part was difficult for me to go through. While alp reviews focus on the friendship as a core of the story, in its majority the book shows everyone gaslighting Abby, without really making any comment on the real-life significance of the issue. I wish the gaslighting was carefully orchestrated by the demon, since for me it made for the most gut-wrenching part of the book, but the characters just ignore Abby without much reason - it seems all adults hate her just because it is convenient for the plot.
Finally, although the whole story is almost exclusively female-centered, it fails to be in any way feminist or diverse. For example, Abby is the only one trying to help her friend, but in the end, it is the male exorcist who needs to save the day. Someone else already pointed out the unnecessary racism, which the author casually excuses with the "it was the 80s" phrase. The biggest offender is the brief scene including Slave Day at school, when some students get to humiliate others, which is absolutely unnecessary (the bullying depicted during it could have just as easily taken place on any other day). Similarly, 80s setting seems to jusrify for the author the omnipresent fat phobia and body shaming, making you wonder if he does not share these prejudices himself.
However, I know that many people will enjoy it for its decent writing and fast pace, but it left me with a bad taste in my mouth, all for the wrong reasons.
Graphic: Animal death, Body shaming, Bullying, Fatphobia, Vomit, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Racism
elsebeok's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Eating disorder, Suicidal thoughts, Vomit, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Bullying, Child abuse, Gun violence, Rape, Medical content, and Kidnapping
chelseylb1988's review against another edition
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
5.0
Graphic: Animal death, Drug use, Gore, Mental illness, Violence, Vomit, Suicide attempt, Sexual harassment, and Injury/Injury detail
aformeracceleratedreader's review against another edition
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
2.0
Graphic: Body horror, Bullying, Child abuse, Drug use, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Blood, Vomit, Medical content, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Alcohol, Dysphoria, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
alba_marie's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
This is now my third book by him – after The Southern Book Club's Guide to Slaying Vampires and Horrorstör and I have loved them all.
One thing that seems important to Hendrix is voice – or lack thereof. Giving voice to the silenced, and pointing out the unfairness of those whose voices are dismissed or even taken away. In the Southern Book Club, he gives voice to under-appreciated 80's housewives who are repeated dismissed by their husbands when they attempted to bring their new neighbour's bad intentions to light. In Horrorstör, he gives voice to minimum wage employees who are often overlooked by society simply because they are defined by their jobs. And in this book, he gives voice to 80's teenagers – particularly teenage girls – whose fears and concerns and attestations are repeatedly ignored and belittled and even punished by their parents.
Hendrix is also quite clever in addressing the issues surrounding sexual assault without actually including a sexual assault. In the Southern Book Club, the vampire was used as a stand-in for a rapist – particularly in terms of how the women's accusations were treated by men.
Something similar happens here in My Best Friend's Exorcism... demonic possession is a stand in for unwanted bodily assault. He is more overt in this one, actually calling out rape. Adult reactions are similar in this book as Book Club – those in power do everything they can to deride and punish the accusers because in making their accusations, they are essentially rocking the status quo.
At times challenging, darkly comical, thought-provoking and gross, the book, designed to resemble an American 1980s yearbook, is certainly a standout, and I recommend this (or any) of Grady Hendrix's strange but superb horror books.
Graphic: Body horror, Eating disorder, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Drug use, Gore, and Sexual violence
Minor: Body shaming, Death, Mental illness, and Classism
melliedm's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Felt like the sapphic undertones were purposeful (lampshades! Lampshades everywhere!), but completely unfulfilled. How you can go from DBNQ to DAQ and then tell me how they ended and miss the chance to complete the sentence is a disappointment. But it was a fun read despite that.
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Body shaming, Bullying, Child abuse, Confinement, Drug use, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Fatphobia, Mental illness, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Blood, Vomit, Kidnapping, Suicide attempt, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Gun violence, Racial slurs, Racism, Mass/school shootings, Car accident, Cultural appropriation, Alcohol, and Classism
Minor: Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual content, and Slavery
redhothabanero's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Body shaming, Bullying, Drug use, Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, Gore, Misogyny, Racism, Rape, Self harm, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Blood, Vomit, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
kshertz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Body shaming, Bullying, Chronic illness, Death, Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Suicidal thoughts, Torture, Blood, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail