Reviews with content warning for Fire/Fire injury - The London Séance Society

Reviews tagging 'Fire/Fire injury'

The London Séance Society by Sarah Penner

19 reviews

apersonfromflorida's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Content Warnings

ash_ton's review

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes

4.0

Besides the fact that I liked this book, the only thing I really have to say is that I hated Morley and I knew he was gonna be an asshole from the start. Like, based on this quote alone:

"I was sure then that she was about to decline. I thought quickly of my rebuttal. I would remind her of the repercussions of trespassing, and I would inform her that, in fact, several members of the Met were in the building at this very moment. Not that I would have reported her. I only wanted to continue this conversation" (page 52).

Like, manipulative as fuck. Piece of shit.

I also wonder why Morley is written in 1st person and Lenna is written in 3rd person. Is it so we're distanced from Lenna and more in Morley's mind, so we get the whole of his personality? Idk.

Content Warnings

melliedm's review

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.5

I loved and devoured The Lost Apothecary and was certain I would love The London Seance Society, but I’m afraid it’s been maddeningly disappointing.

Do you ever watch HGTV-style shows, where they leave you with a cliffhanger before the commercial break, and then when they come back they replay all of the clips leading up to the cliffhanger so that if you just landed on it by channel flipping you wouldn’t be lost? This book does that. Each chapter begins with what truly feels like a recap of what I literally just finished reading, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Lenna’s spiritualist sister was murdered. Despite her skepticism, Lenna approaches her sister’s mentor Vaudeline to ask her to return to London to perform a seance, but the medium has good reason not to return.

The mystery is unfolds through two perspectives: Lenna’s, and a man named Mr. Morley who similarly entreats Vaudeline to return to London to perform a seance. Not for Lenna’s sister, but for the chair of the London Seance Society.

Conceptually, it sounds pretty great. Add in the thorough research and the sapphic relationship brewing between Lenna and Vaudeline and this should have been The One for me. Alas…

Despite Seance Society being a mystery, there’s very little patience and an extraordinary amount of explaining. Reveals happen so frequently that it’s almost exhausting, and each is paired with a thorough description of how the clues connect. It was frustratingly difficult to invest in characters when several passages would be spent spelling out the clues the author had already made clear. There was also an avoidance of holding any cards back: characters would frequently confront another with incomplete information and gain little from it, disposing of any dramatic tension we could have felt by knowing that, say, Lenna had access to secrets that other characters weren’t aware of. Instead, she would learn something and then a few paragraphs later reveal it.

Remember when I said Lenna is a skeptic? Well, in this novel spirits are absolutely real, and she’s given reason after reason to believe in them. And yet, she denies it over and over. Yet, this skeptic is also not skeptical enough for it to really matter: it’s a point of interpersonal conflict and doesn’t really engage with the rest of the world. She’ll have a disagreement with Vaudeline, and then by the end of that chapter or the start of the next she’ll shrug and move on. Perhaps if she was shown through her behaviour as more skeptical and was consistent in this I could have believed it, but it just came across as someone trying to write a character they don’t understand.

The final problem is Lenna’s relationship with Vaudeline. When we meet these characters there’s already (supposedly) a romantic tension between them. We’re told again and again that there’s something there. But we really aren’t shown it. I so desperately wanted to believe that these two women were attracted to one another, that they wanted one another enough to put aside their beliefs on the occult—but I couldn’t. They had little to no chemistry and because we were dropped into their relationship when they had already acquainted themselves with one another we didn’t get to see what that push/pull was like.

All in all, this sapphic seance mystery was sure a sapphic seance mystery, but that’s about it. I truly hope this, and not Lost Apothecary, was a one-off—I want to like Penner’s work so much. Next time, though, I’ll probably wait for my library to get a copy.

Content Warnings