Reviews

Cane by Jean Toomer

meks17's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

oliviatheron's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark hopeful tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

a2lulu's review

Go to review page

4.0

There's a stellar performance of this book by Audra McDonald, "six-time Tony Award-winning actress" in Spotify podcasts, highly recommended.

tarrowood's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A good book that gives me hints of W.E.B. DuBois’s The Souls of Black Folk. The multimedia part of Cane was fun, but I didn’t quite know what I was getting into when I started (aside from it being a classic Harlem Renaissance read). Overall, a good, critical, book

tallbox's review

Go to review page

emotional reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

agmaynard's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective medium-paced

4.0

Vignettes, poetry, even a play feel to some of the pieces that make up the experience of Cane.  Beautiful and wrenching.  And I had a correspondingly beautiful centenary edition with conversation cards to enhance my journey.

flowerbinsh's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Read as a requirement for my Modernism class.

Honestly, I skimmed the HELL out of this one, and I'm not sure if I'm going to go back to it. I was extremely interested to read the introduction and the background of Jean Toomer's life. I was captured by the idea of a story written by a mixed light-skinned man who started passing as white into his adulthood. I also was intrigued by the structure of this story, and how it's a mix of poetry, prose, drama, and short story. The actual story, however, didn't capture me as much as I thought it would. 

mahima123's review

Go to review page

3.0

While this book was unbelievably interesting in its exploration of very important themes (the sexualization of women, black women as objects, racism, biracial relationships, religion, race relations and Jim Crow to name a few) as well as its imagery, it falls short for me as a piece of art. When reading I look for the ability to comprehend the words on the page before I can begin to decipher what feels like a puzzle, or better said by me “why spend 20 words on something that could be said in 10.” This book is extremely verbose to the point where it crosses over into boring and the mix of different writing forms (story, poetry, pseudo-play) lend to creating a reading environment that doesn’t let any one thought stick in the reader’s brain. I also did some background digging and I think the story got it stars from me because of Toomer’s life story. He was biracial and to see how that experience translated into this book was enough to keep me reading. Tbh I just might not be sophisticated enough to read this, but I’m glad it was chosen for book club it changed up my pacing.

tealeavesandroses's review

Go to review page

emotional hopeful informative reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

4.25

alfie_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

I love what this book represents as the pioneering work of the Harlem Renaissance but as a novel it’s a confusing selection of vignettes that are too chaotic to follow.