meanypanini's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I thought it was about silly green man, but it's deep. I hated the middle part where it talked about the family he was watching, but everything else was great. The suspense I felt was genuine, and the story was so dramatic.

solarmuser's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

fortiora's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Beautifully written, really liked this. Only wish I'd read it at a less stressful period in my life, so on to the reread pile it goes

adarcy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

jazmine27's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Loveable characters? No

3.75

jennwith2ns's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I listened to Dan Stevens read this to me and it was incredible. I also have soooooo many moral questions after reading this haha different than I expected but still so good!!!

v4mpstarzz's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? No

4.0

Going to keep this short because I already wrote a long review but it really is an incredible read! It’s often looked at through a feminist lens, however I found that it could also be looked at from a multitude of lenses; Deconstructionist, Marxist, definitely psychoanalytical, etc. As much as I loved it, I found it to be very slowly paced and it did put me in a bit of a reading slump, so for that, I have to give it a 4 star rating. Certainly something I’d recommend to others, my ADHD just struggled reading something so slowly paced.

sueshi's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Loved this book.

My favorite part was the fact that you have different narrators so you can explore the pov of several characters.
I was actually surprised by how mean Victor is when he talks about his creation. He calls his creation a Demon and he basically goes mentally ill after seeing him for the first time.

Victor seems to agree that he as the creator had a duty of being there for him. However this story is about the struggles of Victor after finishing his work and about how he handles something none of us could ever handle.

The novel also shows the struggles of the monster. Can you imagine being the only one that looks like that and everyone is scared of you ?, knowing no one (no matter how kind they are) will ever give you a chance. Also, he was abandoned, he had to learn everything by himself. His loneliness is what makes him the monster Victor truly fears.

It’s a tragic story.
This a classic you should definitely read !

kimtran's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Frankenstein might have been a disappointing read for many due to its misleading representation in modern media. it is a horror story but not in the way one would suspect from how the monster is depicted in films nowadays; it's about the horrors mankind commits for the sake of pride yet goes against nature and leaves an irreversible scar on our environment. Frankenstein is a classic example of misinterpretation; it’s rather Victor Frankenstein who is the monster - the modern Prometheus who is condemned to eternal torment for defying the gods and stealing fire for humanity.

zaisgraph's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Apart from the final monologue of the creature, this novel did not speak to me as strongly as I expected. To be honest, though Frankenstein is more poetic in a way than Dracula, I found the latter far more coherent and entertaining.

The creature has vaguely defined superpowers...

Superspeed? Teleportation? Functional invisibility/extreme camouflage? Super healing? Independent language and multivehicle operation learning? Extreme bushcraft? Ability to survive without protein? 

He just wanted to have fuck buddy lol cmon!! And yes despite being douchebag vouyeur and serial/child killer he is infinitely better than alchemist/necromancer betamale and incest participant, Victor Frankenstein lolllll

This novel has a poorly actualized plot... yeah it's all over the place. I get the message of responsible creation/innovation (how many human inventions did we let loose on earth that has/had dractic consequences), but everything could've been delivered so much better.