dreadspawn's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative medium-paced

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

chelseacrystal's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective sad medium-paced

4.75

Gut wrenching but very interesting. I honestly procrastinated finishing this one bc I was having such a good time. 

It’s incredibly well researched and the tone is appropriate given the subject matter without being overly serious. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

l_piller's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative reflective medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

churrocaitie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark informative medium-paced

5.0

What an amazing book. I love “niche” history and this book takes the cake. And Sam Kean’s writing is perfect for me. I enjoyed how he structured the book in each chapter, and told the stories so well of these “mad scientists”. I almost wish he had this book longer, I kept wanting to learn more. What a perfect book for someone like me who enjoys weird, dark history. And, of course, makes you really think about humanity.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gk1412's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative mysterious reflective fast-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mfrisk's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative slow-paced

3.0

I’ve been reading a lot more this year and getting through books quicker especially those I’ve enjoyed. However, this read took me several months to finish. 

I note this because while I find the overall subject interesting and also important in terms of the fields of science, medicine, and fields which intersect with these areas I don’t feel like these stories were given the appropriate weight and critical lens. As many reviewers mention inappropriate terminology is used for a variety of marginalized populations within this book and I often felt the author was trying to get a laugh out of us (the readers) more than they were working to connect the story to their larger point of morality and ethics. The podcast plugs were annoying but not as egregious as the lack of depth certain stories were given when they covered very sensitive topics. It may not have hurt for their to be additional commentary from other folks especially in stories where marginalized populations were involved and that was only touched on a surface level. I’ve listened to the podcast as well after reading some stories in this book and it has similar issues seen in this book. 

Also want to add this book could have used a more central defining element or at least narrowing down to specific field or some other way to make this more focused. It often was confusing that the stories felt so disconnected and the conclusion doesn’t quite pull together the ideas enough. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

monstersinspace's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative reflective fast-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

phoebemurtagh's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny sad medium-paced

3.5

3.5 stars

They some things shouldn't be attempted by the faint of heart or squeamish. As a squeamish person myself, I'd like to refine that: you can most certainly attempt, but you might need to skim through the physical descriptions of how to perform an ice pick lobotomy.
This was a good collection of scientists gone bad: some of the stories were disturbing and familiar ones I'd already heard, while some were disturbing and new. My only criticisms would be that while such a book must necessarily take a dark sense of humor, I found the author's attempts at levity in the face of evil just a little irreverent sometimes. More disappointingly, though, the author refers to bunk science as "voodoo" in at least one place; it's a small thing, but perpetuating a stereotype that African disaporic religious traditions that developed as a result of American slavery are somehow 'less valid' and the equivalent of bad science is below the mark for any journalist.
All in all, I preferred The Disappearing Spoon, but this is a good book, too.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

chupacobbruh's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny informative medium-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kbergsten's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative reflective fast-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings