Scan barcode
Reviews tagging 'Drug use'
The Book of Trespass: Crossing the Lines that Divide Us by Nick Hayes
6 reviews
ashwaar's review against another edition
5.0
Moderate: Animal death, Classism, Colonisation, Drug use, and Slavery
lynxpardinus's review against another edition
4.5
Graphic: Drug use, Sexism, Slavery, Violence, Misogyny, Police brutality, Racism, Xenophobia, Confinement, and Classism
Moderate: Animal death, Gun violence, Racial slurs, Rape, Religious bigotry, War, Genocide, Homophobia, Child death, Death of parent, Injury/Injury detail, Lesbophobia, Antisemitism, Gaslighting, Medical content, Murder, Sexual violence, Suicide, and Animal cruelty
Minor: Excrement, Fatphobia, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Alcohol, Cancer, Fire/Fire injury, and Incest
woweewhoa's review against another edition
4.0
Graphic: Colonisation, Animal death, Sexism, and Racism
Moderate: Racial slurs and Drug use
Minor: Fatphobia and Ableism
lasunflower's review against another edition
4.5
I only took off .5 stars due to some small misinformation.
E.g. He attests a quote is from William the Conqueror himself, but the quote is actually from Orderic Vitalis' chronicle, written around 50 years later. Chroniclers often fabricated speech. It would have been better for Hayes to say that something 'like according to Orderic Vitalis, William said this...' I am not convinced that the Norman Conquest changed as much as of English land ownership as he makes out, though certainly it did change things somewhat.
Moderate: Drug use
Minor: Animal death, Colonisation, Slavery, Racism, and Xenophobia
charley0796's review against another edition
3.75
It took me about 100 pages to get into his narrative style, it’s more of a ‘I’m on a mini adventure and whilst we are walking I’ll tell you a story of ownership’ - sometimes this was helpful and made what could be a dull book funny and reflective, but I found myself frustrated in parts at how I was reading how he was still on his way after 50 or so pages explaining something.
I found it a really powerful read, until the second to last chapter. In this I spotted his reference to the famous Zimbardo prison study as the Milgram prison study. This destroyed a lot of the faith I had in the book being well researched and trust worthy - much as others have cited below for historical inaccuracies. As such, I’ve knocked a star for these important errors and another 1/4 for my slow interest (though that might be more me than him!)
Moderate: Drug use
halftimelord's review against another edition
5.0
Moderate: Drug use