ashwaar's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous informative reflective medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lynxpardinus's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional informative reflective

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

woweewhoa's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lasunflower's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging informative medium-paced

4.5

A very well written and informative book. Hayes transitions seamlessly between his walks and commentary on land ownership in England. 
I only took off .5 stars due to some small misinformation. 

E.g. He attests a quote is from William the Conqueror himself, but the quote is actually from Orderic Vitalis' chronicle, written around 50 years later. Chroniclers often fabricated speech. It would have been better for Hayes to say that something 'like according to Orderic Vitalis, William said this...' I am not convinced that the Norman Conquest changed as much as of English land ownership as he makes out, though certainly it did change things somewhat.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

charley0796's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny informative lighthearted medium-paced

3.75

This was a really interesting book about trespassing throughout history and parts of Europe. I loved the interweaving of understanding the racial and gender based rules with classism to explain how the ruling class stay in power.
It took me about 100 pages to get into his narrative style, it’s more of a ‘I’m on a mini adventure and whilst we are walking I’ll tell you a story of ownership’ - sometimes this was helpful and made what could be a dull book funny and reflective, but I found myself frustrated in parts at how I was reading how he was still on his way after 50 or so pages explaining something.
I found it a really powerful read, until the second to last chapter. In this I spotted his reference to the famous Zimbardo prison study as the Milgram prison study. This destroyed a lot of the faith I had in the book being well researched and trust worthy - much as others have cited below for historical inaccuracies. As such, I’ve knocked  a star for these important errors and another 1/4 for my slow interest (though that might be more me than him!)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

halftimelord's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring reflective slow-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...