Reviews

A Letter to the Luminous Deep by Sylvie Cathrall

shanaqui's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional mysterious sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

I really loved A Letter to the Luminous Deep, which I believe is Sylvie Cathrall's debut. When I came up for air after finishing it, I was really startled by the number of DNFs, ambivalent reviews, and people who downright hated it. I can understand why, though: it's written in an entirely epistolary format, which mostly works, and the letters are written with a sort of Regency-level formality and style. That means the execution of the plot takes some serious time, since the letters need to build characters and relationship in order to make the plot feel satisfying.

The frame story behind why these letters have been collected is equally important, in the end, to the story revealed in the letters themselves. There's basically three threads:

1. Henery and E. form a friendship, discover something mysterious, and investigate it, ultimately leading to their disappearance;
2. E.'s sister Sophy is part of an expedition deep underwater to study wildlife, which encounters something strange as well;
3. Sophy and Vyerin (Henery's brother) try to piece together their siblings' archive of letters to understand how their connection formed and what happened to them.

The third thread is fraught with grief and fondness, as Sophy and Vyerin try to figure out what their lives look like without their siblings, try to give comfort to one another, and work through the loss to remember who their siblings were and share something of that. The first and second threads take time to reveal their secrets, and we discover what happened at the same pace as Sophy and Vyerin come to understand it themselves.

It's a story that rewards some patience, and which may depend on how well the letters hit for you. I had no trouble telling who was writing what letter, though I know other readers did, and I loved E. and her bravery in vulnerability, discussing what is clearly obsessive-compulsive disorder, and possibly also social anxiety or maybe generalised anxiety disorder. I thought that portrayal was well done, as someone who has OCD/GAD, and I wasn't surprised to learn that Cathrall has OCD. (I didn't find it triggering, for what it's worth, though the things that get to me are a little different from E.'s triggers.)

I've seen people describe this one as cosy, and I think it both is and isn't. There's a deep sadness here in knowing from the start that E. and Henery are gone, and in following Vyerin and Sophy's path to understand why they died.

There are a few points that felt overly awkward to me in the epistolary format, and the one that jumped out was Henery and E.'s first meeting, where we know what happened because they wrote notes to each other on a programme because E.'s brother is putting on some kind of performance that's too loud for them to hear each other. It's a reasonably neat way of getting them into the same place but preserving a text record, but what they've supposedly written to each other (in full sentences, with punctuation) doesn't ring true -- even lampshaded by the commentary of Sophy, who says her sister would've used full sentences to calm herself down.

Still, for the most part it worked well for me, and I felt enchanted. I'm eager to read the next book, and wondering how on earth it can be achieved through the medium of letters.

jessmlamb's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional hopeful mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.75

hay_elfkin's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

0.25

torreygentillon's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

waywardbookshelf's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful mysterious relaxing slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I really enjoyed the world that Cathrall has created. With the under-sea setting, and all the lore that exists within both the scholarship and fiction of the world, I found it very intriguing. Without giving away any spoilers, let's just say I am definitely looking forward to reading the next book, and the promise of getting deeper into the world and it's lore.

The epistolary format also made this the perfect book to pick up and read just a few minutes before bed during a particularly busy work season. By about the third letter, a mystery was revealed and I was hooked. I was pleasantly surprised that the investigative nature of the story meant that the letters, articles, and journal entries included are from a whole cast of characters, and not only going back and forth between two people. This added a lot more texture and nuance to both the world and the mystery that was unfolding, and allowed the author to remain really true to the epistolary writing style. The one thing that got a little tiring for me were the extra-long postscripts, and the written apologies from characters for things they didn't really need to be apologizing for. However, that is a small enough thing in the scope of the story, and didn't take away from my enjoyment of the world or it's characters.

I would highly recommend this book for anyone who enjoys cozy academia, epistolary novels, natural history, under-sea settings, or just plain old cozy fantasy. It's a wonderful debut work!

disreputabledog's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

rivensbane's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

should this actually be rated 4 stars according to CAWPILE? yes.
am i bumping it up to 5 stars because i enjoyed + loved it so much? also yes. i need book two NOW. 

hanzy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes

2.75

dahehe's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny lighthearted mysterious medium-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes

5.0

A fun , quirky book.  

rogiercaprino's review

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25