amyteurhour's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This was a bit jarring, which considering this was written round-robin style, makes sense. It seems that the selection of contributing authors' styles didn't really mesh well with each other. The conclusion, while probable, seemed to be a bit cobbled together.
The audiobook was fine, if a bit inconsistent for some characters, although that might be related to the writing itself.
2.5 stars rounded up

d_nice_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.25

izfehy's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

harrietnbrown's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

DNF because of the egregious fatshaming of a character described as "grossly overweight." Really? Shame on you.

theelliemo's review

Go to review page

2.0

A disappointment. I enjoyed the original collaborative novel by the Detection Club, The Floating Admiral, and had high hopes for this modern homage, but it didn’t achieve. This was written using a different approach to the Floating Admiral (in which each participating member of The Detection Club wrote a chapter each), with different authors writing each sub-plot and each part being weaved into the novel as appropriate. It’s lead to a disjointed novel, with little flow, several continuity errors, and a range of underdeveloped and unlikeable characters. The two detectives in particular are dreadful caricatures. Simon Brett’s introduction points out that because the crime genre has developed into so many different sub-genres, it wasn’t possible to write The Sinking Admiral in the same way as The Floating Admiral. Based on this evidence, I would go further, and suggest it just simply isn’t possible.
More...