Scan barcode
ziggymoonrock's review against another edition
3.25
Graphic: Rape
Moderate: Ableism, Lesbophobia, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Sexual assault, and Homophobia
voilajean's review against another edition
1.5
Graphic: Animal death, Lesbophobia, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Homophobia, Misogyny, Racism, Rape, Sexual assault, and Sexual content
childofmongreldogs's review against another edition
- Loveable characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
The writing was good. I love Richard Matheson's short fiction so it wasn't a problem with the actual quality of the prose itself which has me feeling a certain kind of way about this novel. I will also say that the actual storyline itself was good as well. The twists and turns kept me on the edge of my seat. This feels like the definition of a genre. The ultimate kind of haunted house story.
The way I was on edge throughout the story was next level. Not really terrifying but I think that a lot of the tension was well done. I think that Matheson was an absolutely phenomenal writer.
I just can't jive with horror novels from this era, I think. There's too much that is bad writing to me because it fundamentally misunderstands certain people. I know that that is a controversial opinion to have: I don't like this novel because it's depiction of women is bad and it's depiction of the LGBT group is bad and it's depiction of people other than white straight men is bad, but it is what it is.
There's always a lot of handwringing and excuses for it being a different time so having an indigenous man's spirit talk like a cave man, a possible lesbian be a lesbian because she was sexually molested, and have women be generally overly emotional and easy to control (among other things like in other novels) is just something we have to forgive, just a quirk of the time, instead of being seen as a legitimate problem in the writing.
Is this the worst offender of these issues? Probably not. I'm currently reading one that's even worse, really, from a fundamental level. The problem though is that being slightly better or on the lighter end of awful for the time period isn't enough for me to forgive that form of writing. I think there's a place for making things uncomfortable for the reader, but it was lazy even then to make it uncomfortable for women by simply filling the story with violent rape of the female characters.
I can see that there's some aspects of this novel that are really good and interesting. It doesn't make up for the "problematic" nature of the novel in other ways for me.
Graphic: Animal death, Blood, Colonisation, Incest, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Suicide, Body horror, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Murder, Rape, Addiction, Alcoholism, Death, Gore, Homophobia, Biphobia, Lesbophobia, Sexism, Torture, and Violence
Minor: Animal death, Blood, Drug use, Injury/Injury detail, Pedophilia, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Torture, Violence, Adult/minor relationship, Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Gore, Grief, Homophobia, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Racism, Rape, Sexism, Cannibalism, Incest, Suicide, Suicide attempt, Body horror, Infidelity, Sexual content, Child death, Death, Fire/Fire injury, Sexual harassment, Addiction, Colonisation, Drug abuse, and Murder
sargasso_c's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
1.0
Graphic: Animal death, Gore, Lesbophobia, Racism, Sexual violence, Suicide, and Violence
Moderate: Homophobia, Rape, and Suicide attempt
Minor: Incest and Vomit