rachelelln's review

Go to review page

dark
This man’s a bit of a pervert 🤨

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

notcharlottete's review

Go to review page

challenging dark medium-paced
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

claudiatylr's review

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Woof, where to start with this one? This was as exhausting as I was promised. DFW is on the one hand an incredibly gifted writer, with prose more haunting than I’ve read in a while. Yet on the other hand he seems deeply insecure, begging the reader to know that he knows his characters are evil. Yet still revealing on every page how much he seems to personally relate to the monstrous men. He also alludes to the fact that he imagines his reader as a woman, which makes it all the more sinister. 

While I’m glad I finally choked my way through this one, I can’t really recommend it to any audience. For women it feels almost violating to read, while men seem to somehow become complicit just by tagging along with the narrator.

P.S. To the college bros who told me this was their favorite book…. bombastic side-eye.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

crostonk's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

I love the unparalleled style of David Foster Wallace’s writing; DFW compilations are excellent. The stories are full of weird ideas and unique perspectives served up like tapas from a place at the intersection of postmodern-metacognitive anxiety and a train full of guys who smell weird.

The story(?) Datum Centurio, a fictitious futuristic usage dictionary entry for the word “date”, is a novel way of making a statement about contemporary (circa-1990s) relationships. It is a perfect example of why I love DFW and the medium of short stories in general.

Octet’s philosophical and moralistic premise and subsequent devolution into self-referential anxiety is great. DFW’s writing always feels unvarnished - the footnoted “Milorad Fucksalot” serving to demonstrate an idea without need for “flaccid abstractions” or prolonged explanation. 

Similarly, “the uremic breeze that follows” shows how wonderful DFW is with language - florid abstractions for purpose (and elegance). 

The presiding thread of psychological trauma attributed to youth, sexual violence, and masculinity is compelling throughout this collection, although I don’t necessarily find David Foster Wallace’s writing insightful as much as erudite. Reading DFW is like having a conversation with a clever friend who accurately represents facets and faces of existence for consideration without a prescribed moral conclusion. 

DFW is the author I have the most fun reading - always sharp and funny. It is a treat to read his words. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kelleo615's review

Go to review page

challenging dark funny mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rexregum's review

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mergrubb's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective fast-paced

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...