Scan barcode
shellydennison's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
rebeccazh's review against another edition
3.0
fellrnr's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.0
eleni12's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.25
ran_sophia's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Suicide, Blood, Antisemitism, Death, Violence, and Torture
Moderate: Physical abuse
chrisscrivens's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
gfarinas's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
jgintrovertedreader's review against another edition
3.0
Reading this felt like slogging through the mud created by the never-ending rain in the book. It just dragged on and on and on. Finally, in about the last hundred pages, the action picked up and everything started to get interesting.
I enjoyed reading more about Shardlake and Barak, but overall, I have a lot of problems with the book. There were a lot of typos that drove me crazy. The Bealknap case (remember that from [b:Dark Fire|138683|Dark Fire (Matthew Shardlake #2)|C.J. Sansom|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172096995s/138683.jpg|4595372]?) is still. dragging. on. C'mon and let it die already! With Shardlake being in the barbarous north, he obviously doesn't really understand the dialect. The explanation of some of the more common terms was unbelievably clumsy. One character basically says out of the blue, "Oh, by the way, old boy, did you know that gate means street up here?" Yes, it really was that bad.
Reading this so soon after [a:Ken Follett|3447|Ken Follett|http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1197600287p2/3447.jpg]'s [b:The Pillars of the Earth|5043|The Pillars of the Earth|Ken Follett|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1165517379s/5043.jpg|3359698] was actually pretty interesting. In Pillars, we get to see how important the monasteries are and the hard work that goes into building a cathedral. In Sansom's books, the pendulum has swung the other way and they're being destroyed. I've never really thought too much about how much art, architecture, and history was lost in these kinds of purges, but the juxtaposition of the two books really brought that home for me.
I'll keep reading, and if you've read the others, I would recommend you do the same. It was still decent, and I do look forward to the next in the series. I just hope it's better.
tvrandhavane's review against another edition
5.0
Sansom is intelligent. He has proved that in Dissolution and Dark Fire by weaving a mystery in a historical background. He continues the Shardlake story in Sovereign with another mystery.
Sansom's characters have an inherent characteristic according to which they behave in joy, in fear, in disappointment and in anger. For Shardlake it was his goodness, for Barak it was his loyalty. You can see this in the characters of this book too.
This book has many plot twists and it's unpredictableness keeps you hinged to the book. Sansom's characters are clever, you will find no action that is not supported by a reasonable cause. Sansom's knowledge of the people is evident.
didactylos's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5