Reviews tagging 'Death'

1Q84 by Haruki Murakami

34 reviews

bellaa's review

Go to review page

challenging mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Format: Background, overall thoughts, likes, critiques, miscellaneous
Background: I first bought this book in 2019 because I thought it looked intriguing. I then spent the next three years attempting over and over again to start and power through it, until I realized this is not really a book that you attempt to power through. This is a book you take chapter by chapter, line by line, with time in between. When I realized that, it became a lot easier to consume and enjoy because I knew I would be able to take time away from it eventually.
Overall thoughts: I thought it was a good book. It was alright. The world-building was spectacular, the writing itself was very detailed, I found myself enjoying it at a lot of parts. But then, Murakami would write something (and I'm blaming him for this) that took me completely out of it, often relating to the character's sexual preferences. This could be an incredible book had Murakami's editor taken a more liberal red pen. I also think this book was attempting to be a lot more thought-provoking than it was. The story was superfluous at times, probably around 600 pages to long. However, I do think it is a good book to be read by people willing to overlook some of the more out-there statements Murakami just throws in for the fun of it.
Likes: Again, I like the poetic writing, the world-building, and (at some points) the characters. These are all things Murakami excels at. He can make things intricate, detailed, and interesting. He also has shining moments in between the fluff. It is impossible to not see the appeal of this book when it comes to these things.
Critiques: But then we get to the critiques. Firstly, it's long. That much is obvious. It is long and while there is nothing necessarily wrong with it, I don't think it does Murakami himself much good. Does he write incredibly well, simplistic yet detailed? Yes, absolutely. Does the long form of the novel give way to much of Murakami's personal fetishes and sexual fantasies? Also yes (more on that later). The story becomes too much, lost in a way that I'm not sure Murakami intended. 
Secondly, the characters' insecurity. I'm not hating on anyone for being insecure, but God, Murakami's characters are some of the most insecure, self-obsessed, and boring people I have ever met. The female main character's obsession with her small breasts, the male secondary character that is constantly reminding us how ugly and unlikable he is. Etc. Etc. Etc. I'm done with it. I'm tired. I don't need to be constantly reminded of how much these characters, and everyone around them, finds them ugly and unlikable and a million other adjectives boiling down to insecure. Murakami, make your characters confident 2022.
Thirdly, the sexual shit. Tengo does not need to keep reminding us of a) his mothers' sexual affair in front of him that he constantly has flashbacks to (that he then recreates with his girlfriend and it makes him nut immediately???), b) his lack of attraction (but possible, there's always a possibility) for the teenage girl he is in a very confusing friendship with, and c) his constant masturbation over a hand touch from a girl he knew once when he was ten. Aomame, for the first half of the book, reminds the audience of her fetish for balding older men every chapter, or even twice every chapter. Additionally, the constant mention of her forays into homosexuality without any tangible results just frustrated me. I firmly believe Murakami just finds lesbians sexually attractive but refuses to condone homosexuality (no tangible evidence, just opinion lol). That brings the list of Murakami's sexual shit that he included in this book up to five: Oedipus complexes (??), pre-pubescent hand-touching (/j), women's ears, women's breasts (constantly, fucking constantly), and lesbians. 
[Massive TW for this paragraph: pedophilia, graphic descriptions of sex]
Then, we get to the canon-necessary pedophilia. And I say canon-necessary because it is literally built into the world that the pedophilia is necessary for the religion and for the world. The male main character is literally described as unable to move a singular muscle while the teenage girl fucks herself on him. Firstly, why the ever-loving, god-forsaken fuck would you write that. Second off, not loving the idea that the grown man is literally forced to be helpless, while an insatiable teenage girl gets fucked by him. Feeling very eh on that one Murakami. He was teasing pedophilia the entire book and then finally gave it to us (like we even wanted it??), then attempted to make us forget it happened by having Tengo and Fuka-Eri not bring it up after it happened. But Tengo kept bringing it up in his internal monologue and like half-condemn it, but also be like "It's not my fault, I couldn't move :/"

Miscellaneous: Fuka-Eri may essentially be a manic pixie dream girl, but I love her. She deserves the world. Wish this book had been about her and only her. 
Conclusion: Murakami, get a fucking editor

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

j_abby's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

shelbytheduck's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

I cant tell if it is the worst book ive ever read or my favorite. I feel like i want to reread it but the 1000 pages were a struggle and I dont think i could read it again for a very long time.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

maac's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ajhoppel's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

andreanicole's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

qi_'s review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix

5.0

omg get fucked i actually read it. will write a full review later
  • book 1 = a much slower character study and can see that people might stop reading at this point since the plot meanders for while. however, since i enjoy character driven stories i didn't mind. 
  • book 2 = plot picks up but not as fast as i expected. start to uncover the background but still was left unsure of where the plot would go because it was still a little bit stagnent. 
  • book 3 = plot picks up again but it didn't feel rushed and was actually still quite slow and i was approaching the end and was still like so what is gonna happen. it did feel a little repetitive between the perspectives though. 
  • ending = i have so many questions but im not mad about it ?? i would have gladly read another couple hundred pages just to answer the questions. however, i still felt satisfied which is quite weird. 
overall, i enjoy murakami's writing style and the what the fuckery that he brings is here (aND MORE)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

blueberryhotel's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

the most unrealistic part of this book wasn’t the two moons in the sky, or the
weird cult that makes doppelgängers of young girls,
or the parallel universe thing. it was that
aomame is supposedly heterosexual

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mudkipmillie's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

This book, although one of Murakami’s most famous, is definitely not up there as one of his best for me. The ending is HIGHLY unresolved, and not in Murakami’s typical “up to interpretation” type ending. It is truly unresolved.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

dorathebald's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

Really love Aomame's morally-ambiguous character but Tengo is annoying af. 
Also the over-sexualisation of minors and insinuating that they wanted sex with a much older adult is just fucked up. 
Also freshly-baked boobs. wtf is that. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings