Scan barcode
pey333's review
emotional
funny
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexism
Moderate: Abortion, Bullying, Homophobia, Pregnancy, Cursing, Death, Lesbophobia, and Misogyny
Minor: Racism, Sexual content, and Miscarriage
beffynicole's review against another edition
emotional
funny
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Thank you to NetGalley, Dahlia Adler & Wednesday Books for an advanced copy of this book in exchange for an honest review!
I got home from Pride, sunburnt and fully expecting to pass out when I decided to pick up this book to read before bed. Cue me reading the entire book in one sitting, not even moving, and staying up way too late before work!
Despite that, I probably would have rated this book lower if it wasn’t about being queer. There were some parts that hit me really hard as a queer person who has struggled with religious trauma and that relatability definitely brought the score up.
I highly suggest that readers view the trigger warnings before reading this book because it definitely wasn’t a bundle of queer joy.
I got home from Pride, sunburnt and fully expecting to pass out when I decided to pick up this book to read before bed. Cue me reading the entire book in one sitting, not even moving, and staying up way too late before work!
Despite that, I probably would have rated this book lower if it wasn’t about being queer. There were some parts that hit me really hard as a queer person who has struggled with religious trauma and that relatability definitely brought the score up.
I highly suggest that readers view the trigger warnings before reading this book because it definitely wasn’t a bundle of queer joy.
Home Field Advantage follows Amber, a high school cheerleader from a small-town vying to become captain, but she’s also got a secret – she’s polysexual. She’s been fine not having crushes on any of the Atherton High School kids, waiting until college until she can be out and free. That is, until the new quarterback, Jack, shows up.
After the fatal car crash involving Robbie, Atherton’s former quarterback, Jack Walsh becomes the high school’s first female football player – which already would make waves but on top of that, Jack is very obviously a lesbian, and the team feels like she is “taking” the quarterback position away from the guys on the team while trampling over Robbie’s legacy.
Amber and Jack navigate their attraction, social relationships, at times conflicting motivations, and small-town bigotry.
All in all, I did enjoy this book, but I do think there were a lot of issues that would have led me to rate this lower if it wasn’t queer and tugging at parts of my heart.
PROS:
I think the details on other queer characters not wanting to out other queer characters were perfect. A lot of times the media will portray a queer person as being upset that another queer person doesn’t want to come out. To me, this is completely the opposite because we all know that coming out can be hard and dangerous. Many of us wouldn’t hold it against someone, even if we decide that’s not a life we can personally choose for ourselves.
Adler does a great job of using Amber not wanting to come out as a great plot point, while also making it clear that her friends would have been okay with that if she had just been honest about it instead of lying to both of them.
The queer representation wasn’t limited to the two main characters. Obviously Amber and Jack are sapphic, but Amber has an openly bisexual mom, and a best guy friend, Miguel, who is gay and has a boyfriend. Miguel gets A LOT of page time for a side character. On top of that, Jack has a friend who is asexual (and aromantic maybe?) and another who uses they/them pronouns.
The conversation on not making someone out to be a saint just because they died was decently done. I think this is a hard topic to talk about and not one that everyone agrees with, but I still commend the author for addressing it. I don’t think it was perfect, but this is something that a lot of queer (and other marginalized) people can understand. There are people who have hurt us or continued to support our oppression and we don’t always feel like commemorating their deaths. In fact, some might celebrate.
There are also times that someone is being praised or glorified, dead or alive, who have hurt us, and we can’t say anything about it. This was something that especially rang true to me. We are not always safe to speak up about who caused us pain and it’s always a slap in the face to see people praising them.
Adler does a great job of using Amber not wanting to come out as a great plot point, while also making it clear that her friends would have been okay with that if she had just been honest about it instead of lying to both of them.
The queer representation wasn’t limited to the two main characters. Obviously Amber and Jack are sapphic, but Amber has an openly bisexual mom, and a best guy friend, Miguel, who is gay and has a boyfriend. Miguel gets A LOT of page time for a side character. On top of that, Jack has a friend who is asexual (and aromantic maybe?) and another who uses they/them pronouns.
The conversation on not making someone out to be a saint just because they died was decently done. I think this is a hard topic to talk about and not one that everyone agrees with, but I still commend the author for addressing it. I don’t think it was perfect, but this is something that a lot of queer (and other marginalized) people can understand. There are people who have hurt us or continued to support our oppression and we don’t always feel like commemorating their deaths. In fact, some might celebrate.
There are also times that someone is being praised or glorified, dead or alive, who have hurt us, and we can’t say anything about it. This was something that especially rang true to me. We are not always safe to speak up about who caused us pain and it’s always a slap in the face to see people praising them.
CONS:
Atherton felt like a movie version of a small town. You know the kind, where the person hasn’t actually lived in a small town and this is what they expect the high school and bigotry to be like. I grew up in a homophobic small town riddled with religious bigotry and misogyny. Two actually. There were several times I had to force myself to suspend belief because the characterization just wasn’t fully realistic. A lot of the words and language from the bigots felt more like shock value than what would actually be said.
It can be bad and dangerous; it just presents itself differently.
There were more points that just weren’t believable. A lot of times I just had to force myself to go “it’s a story, it’s already fake so what’s a little more.” I don’t want to have to argue with myself to continue reading the book. One specific example was the football coach not realizing the boys were throwing the game. I mean, come on, if they aren’t good at keeping it a secret from Jack, I doubt they’re good at being sneaky. Especially if they aren’t good at football, they’re not going to be good at faking losing subtly. That does take skill – to know how to fail subtly.
And yeah, adults aren’t always great, but you’re seriously telling me that Amber never went to her mom? Who would absolutely advocate for her especially because she’s bi and would have fought for Jack to be respected as a queer person? No one tried talking to the cheer coach or football coach…At all? Not even give the coach a heads up that they wanted to throw the game BEFORE the game so he could keep an eye on it?
For all the author’s commentary on misogyny, I think she unintentionally writes misogynistic characterizations of women. Every girl in this book except Amber and Jack are written to be completely misogynistic stereotypes of the mean girl airheaded cheerleaders. I think there were better ways to use them as bullies without writing them as completely one-dimensional and almost putting down the fact that they decided to participate in traditional femininity.
The way Jack talks about the cheerleaders, even Amber, is misogynistic too. I don’t think this was fully resolved on Jack’s end just because she ended up with Amber.
This book is heavy. Not physically – no, it’s actually a short read. But I was not prepared for how many topics were going to be touched on this. I honestly thought from the description that this was going to be way more lighthearted than it was. I fully expected misogyny and fear of homophobia to be a theme but this was... a lot. I think if I hadn’t just come back from my own local Pride and celebrated myself, this would have put me in a rut for a couple of days.
This is just as much a romance as it is a political commentary and a story on queer trauma, misogyny, and religious bigotry. I don’t think addressing these things are bad, but there was just one thing after another, and I really felt unprepared for the level of bigotry when I thought it would be romance-focused.
Really EVERYONE at Atherton but Amber, Jack, and Miguel were assholes? This book was lonely. I really wish the author had written a little bit more about some of the characters who started warming up towards the end, like Nia.
Some of the writing felt juvenile to me. I read Cool for the Summer by Dahlia Adler a week or so ago and while the topics in that book weren’t as heavy, the writing felt more advanced and those characters had more depth. I think an attempt was made to give Jack, Amber, and even Miguel depth, but I think this book was too short to do that properly. I knew their motivations, but mostly because it was written in plain print. It was stated not shown.
And the amount of verbiage used to describe Amber and Jack’s physical attributes and… nothing else was a bit much. With a book this short, these sentences are valuable and could have been used in more productive ways, like expanding on Jack and Amber’s relationship instead of it going from 0, to 10, to 100? There also were a lot of repeated phrases.
It can be bad and dangerous; it just presents itself differently.
There were more points that just weren’t believable. A lot of times I just had to force myself to go “it’s a story, it’s already fake so what’s a little more.” I don’t want to have to argue with myself to continue reading the book. One specific example was the football coach not realizing the boys were throwing the game. I mean, come on, if they aren’t good at keeping it a secret from Jack, I doubt they’re good at being sneaky. Especially if they aren’t good at football, they’re not going to be good at faking losing subtly. That does take skill – to know how to fail subtly.
And yeah, adults aren’t always great, but you’re seriously telling me that Amber never went to her mom? Who would absolutely advocate for her especially because she’s bi and would have fought for Jack to be respected as a queer person? No one tried talking to the cheer coach or football coach…At all? Not even give the coach a heads up that they wanted to throw the game BEFORE the game so he could keep an eye on it?
For all the author’s commentary on misogyny, I think she unintentionally writes misogynistic characterizations of women. Every girl in this book except Amber and Jack are written to be completely misogynistic stereotypes of the mean girl airheaded cheerleaders. I think there were better ways to use them as bullies without writing them as completely one-dimensional and almost putting down the fact that they decided to participate in traditional femininity.
The way Jack talks about the cheerleaders, even Amber, is misogynistic too. I don’t think this was fully resolved on Jack’s end just because she ended up with Amber.
This book is heavy. Not physically – no, it’s actually a short read. But I was not prepared for how many topics were going to be touched on this. I honestly thought from the description that this was going to be way more lighthearted than it was. I fully expected misogyny and fear of homophobia to be a theme but this was... a lot. I think if I hadn’t just come back from my own local Pride and celebrated myself, this would have put me in a rut for a couple of days.
This is just as much a romance as it is a political commentary and a story on queer trauma, misogyny, and religious bigotry. I don’t think addressing these things are bad, but there was just one thing after another, and I really felt unprepared for the level of bigotry when I thought it would be romance-focused.
Really EVERYONE at Atherton but Amber, Jack, and Miguel were assholes? This book was lonely. I really wish the author had written a little bit more about some of the characters who started warming up towards the end, like Nia.
Some of the writing felt juvenile to me. I read Cool for the Summer by Dahlia Adler a week or so ago and while the topics in that book weren’t as heavy, the writing felt more advanced and those characters had more depth. I think an attempt was made to give Jack, Amber, and even Miguel depth, but I think this book was too short to do that properly. I knew their motivations, but mostly because it was written in plain print. It was stated not shown.
And the amount of verbiage used to describe Amber and Jack’s physical attributes and… nothing else was a bit much. With a book this short, these sentences are valuable and could have been used in more productive ways, like expanding on Jack and Amber’s relationship instead of it going from 0, to 10, to 100? There also were a lot of repeated phrases.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Homophobia, Lesbophobia, Misogyny, Religious bigotry, Biphobia, Bullying, Sexism, and Sexual harassment
Moderate: Death, Miscarriage, and Outing
Minor: Abortion and Racism
More...