Scan barcode
n0elle's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Now, while I do know the author tried hard to make it appear historically correct, I found it absolutely exhausting to read hundreds of pages of men dictating the protagonist’s life, telling her what she can and can’t do, how she should behave, what (little) she’s worth.
I’m all for women in STEM, driven by ambition and scientific ideas that lead through breakthroughs. BUT if her ideas and success are always overshadowed by a man or even taken by a man, while she just sits idly by.. that’s infuriating, historically correct but still infuriating. And while the main character did get mad about these things, she always stayed quiet. In the rare moments she didn’t, she was belittled and reprimanded so much, I felt the shame of being a woman bleed through the pages.
Maybe the writing was just too good and too real and it made me feel so many emotions, some of which I could have gone without.
Graphic: Animal death, Sexual harassment, Child death, Injury/Injury detail, Medical content, Murder, Violence, Gore, Gun violence, Miscarriage, Death, Grief, Animal cruelty, Blood, Gaslighting, Abandonment, Alcohol, Body horror, Bullying, Chronic illness, Sexism, Classism, Death of parent, Misogyny, Racism, and Terminal illness
random19379's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Body horror, Classism, Sexism, Miscarriage, and Racism
fromthefoxhole's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Frankenstein is one of my all time favorite books, and when I heard "queer feminist retelling" I could not sprint to Libby faster. Having finished Our Hideous Progeny, I would term it more as a sequel - our FMC is Mary, the grand niece of Victor Frankenstein, who only knew of him through the letters our dear Captain Walton left behind. Luckily for us, that voracious curiosity that once consumed Victor very much also has had its claws in Mary since she was young. While she was barred from a formal education as a scientist, she makes up for it with force of will and wit, an insatiable desire for knowledge, and tenacity shaped by a lifetime of exclusion and rejection.
The plot for the first third of the novel is largely to allow us to get to know Mary. We get to see flashbacks of her past alongside instances in the "present" that give weight to her frustration with the scientific society as well as her love for paleontology and natural history. I feel like this slower beginning pace can be frustrating, but it lets our impatience mount with Mary's until finally we arrive at the exciting bit - actually moving forward with attempting to recreate Victor's experiment.
The pace picks up from here for us as the reader as well as for Mary, and things start to spiral out. I won't spoil anything, but relationships take turns, altercations occur, and I ate. it. up. McGill does a phenomenal job getting to the heart of Mary's motives, focusing on her grief, queerness, and living as a woman in a society that regularly demeans women. I found myself getting riled up right alongside Mary, especially in every instance with my new nemesis, Finlay Clarke.
I LOVED the real world references, that the author rooted so much of the story in real and period accurate science. Mary and Henry speak with and are referred to scientists whose work we can still read and those dinosaur sculptures are still up at the Crystal Palace!! The absolute nerd in me couldn't get enough.
Especially for a first novel, I think Our Hideous Progeny hit every target it intended to. I personally cannot wait to see what else McGill writes.
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Misogyny, and Animal death
Moderate: Slavery, Sexual harassment, Medical content, Miscarriage, Racism, and Blood
nefariousbee's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
I am frankly disappointed. This could have been exciting, dark, passionate... but it fell flat. Somehow it was barely dark. In my opinion this could have been a great book, but it needed to lean into the horror, and do some serious editing. As it is, it's just. Fine.
Graphic: Violence, Blood, Ableism, Chronic illness, Gore, Animal death, Misogyny, Injury/Injury detail, and Grief
Moderate: Murder, Animal death, Child death, Death of parent, Classism, Drug use, Fire/Fire injury, Racism, and Sexual harassment
Minor: Pandemic/Epidemic, Colonisation, and Emotional abuse
saloninareads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
It needed more of the creature.
I'm a paleontology nerd. The creature was adorable. It needed more time on the page. It's just a baby abomination that wants to hang out with its mom and play fetch.
All in all I'm very excited to see future stuff from C.E. McGill. What an excellent debut!
Graphic: Racism, Violence, Animal death, and Child death
natashaleighton_'s review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Blood, Gore, Toxic relationship, Misogyny, and Animal death
Moderate: Chronic illness, Injury/Injury detail, Alcohol, Gun violence, Gaslighting, and Child death
Minor: Colonisation, Death of parent, Racism, Sexual assault, and Sexual harassment