Reviews tagging 'Infidelity'

The Red and the Black by Stendhal

6 reviews

marageorge's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

_marco_'s review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

The Red and the Black documents the meteoric rise and even faster fall of Julien Sorel, a carpenter’s son-turned-bourgeois before the vivid backdrop — political, societal, and cultural — of nineteenth-century France. Most synopses of the book comment on the drama of Sorel’s brief yet passionate life, or the accuracy (and inaccuracy) of the France that surrounds him.

I truly believe there is something to be said regarding the human condition that Stendhal’s portrait of Sorel brings to life: What drives us? What is virtue and what is vice? Religion? Jealousy? Power - true power? Stendhal’s characters, each riddled with more flaws than strengths, serve to provide various answers to these questions. The people in these stories are very real, in the sense that I can relate to their psychologies and strange emotions a lot more personally than I would those in other contemporary novels. Here, humanity’s foolish weakness, and the weakness of foolishness, is given a stark spotlight. The eloquent description of the complicated mess and almost comic tragedy of human nature, especially when love is thrown in the mix, is the reason I give it a five star rating. 

“What advantages Fate has given me—celebrity, wealth, youth! Alas! I’ve been given everything, except happiness.”

As a related point, I would like to highlight the brilliance of both the characters of Madame de Rênal and that of Mathilde. They are each other’s perfect foil; I’ve gained personal insight from them both. While one can argue that they are just two women obsessed with Sorel, I believe that their evocative and very real personalities make them two of the most beautifully contrived characters I’ve ever encountered in literature, which is especially surprising given that they were women written by a man in 1830. 

The plot itself remains quite slow through the middle portion of the book. Some passages were also difficult to trudge through, since they contained various historical references I was unfamiliar with. Fortunately my edition (modern library) contained footnotes at the back of the book for clarification. I wouldn’t recommend this book to people who enjoy a quick reading pace and constant action. In any case, I still believe it is well worth the read. This review hardly does it justice. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mmehdi_auteur's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

vincef's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bleuennreads_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

I read it for class and at first I found it really boring. But when I started to really read carefully (from the second part), I found it quite enjoyable. It was still very very long to read, some passages were really useless.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

clarisseep's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

first and foremost this book was A TASK to read
i had to read this book for school and it was extremely long to read, almost and definitely too long to read
the plot in itself is actually good and the fact that the book is divided two parts each with a different “main woman” and with a different “place in society”  
I personally loved Mme de Rênal's motherhood sense and Mathilde’s boredom and posh-ness
Julien’s development evolves through him changing “social classes”
other funny thing is how abbot Priard has incredible sentences/quotes 
I would’ve thought it would been easier to review, and haven’t another idea about how to describe this book without actually spoiling
if you are really bored and want to read a tense, long to read, slow book that’s also a French classic: you may read this book that actually has nice messages 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...