Reviews tagging 'Sexual content'

Romancing the Duke by Tessa Dare

18 reviews

maeverose's review against another edition

Go to review page

DNFed @ 75%

I liked parts of this, disliked other parts. It was the constant back and forth of them clearly liking each other but then stupid things getting in the way of their feelings that ultimately made me dnf. I don’t like angst in my romance unless it’s actually understandable and done well, and imo this was overdone to the point of being annoying. To me, at least.

It’s not mentioned in the synopsis though it’s not a spoiler, the duke is scarred and blind. I can’t fully speak on the disability rep as I’m not blind, but I am disfigured and disabled in different ways.  Overall I don’t think it was done badly, some of the descriptions about how he can see vague shapes and colors in the light tracks with what a blind relative of mine has described, and I like that they showed how he has headaches from the injury and it’s not something that he has zero struggles with. But some of the general language could’ve been better, such as:
“Yesterday, she’d made a journey to Northumberland by herself, taken possession of a medieval fortress, and held her ground against a scarred, angry duke. She ought to feel like a strong woman, by any measure.” Mentioning the scars when trying to make him seem more scary is body shaming. The author could’ve just left it at ‘angry duke’.
Also:
“First, he’d walked to rebuild the strength sapped from his limbs. Then he’d walked to master the lay of this castle without his sight. He might be a wreck, he told himself, but he’d be damned if he’d be an invalid.”
I can’t quite tell if we’re supposed to interpret this as him not wanting his disability to make his life more difficult, as he mentioned that he doesn’t like having to rely on others to help him read, for example. Or if it’s supposed to be interpreted as ‘god forbid I become one of them’. To me, it reads as the latter. Either way the use of the word ‘invalid’ bothers me. It’s used multiple times, and I get that it’s period-accurate but I don’t think it would’ve been difficult to not use the word given that it’s considered pretty ableist by today’s standards.

It also annoys me a bit that the cover on the edition I have makes the duke look like Darcy, which is not at all how he’s described. And he has no scar 🙃 and on the other edition I’ve seen he’s not even on the cover. Obviously that has nothing to do with the actual book though, I believe the publisher is in charge of finding someone to design the cover.

I didn’t like Ransom as a love interest very much. He’s physically aggressive and has anger issues, which I understand is probably to add to the whole rugged bad boy thing, but the way he was written wasn’t sexy to me. It’s borderline abusive. He always asks for consent, but gets grabby with her before establishing that consent. The author also tries to show that he’s caring at the same time, even though his words and actions didn’t fully reflect that, which left me confused. In the first half of the book (before he had any idea Izzy liked him) he repeatedly warns her that he’s a starved man who may not be able to control himself around a woman like her. It almost felt like rape threats, even though from her pov she saw it as thrilling and enticing, if she wasn’t into him that would 100% be interpreted as a rape threat, no? She’s broke, has no where else to go, legally owns the castle, is now employed to him so he’s her only source of income, and yet he’s threatening her that if she stays he might have his way with her… I get this is a fictional romance, and I get why people would be into that kind of story but it wasn’t marketed as that kind of story, so it made me uncomfortable.

This book has the trope of ‘pretty main character thinks she’s just so plain and unlovable and was bullied for her very attractive *cough* hideous physical traits’. She literally called her pale blue eyes plain, as if that isn’t the western beauty ideal. The story even validates this a bit with the fact that the only man who’s ever liked her is blind. It also felt mildly insensitive considering the male love interest has an actual facial disfigurement and in theory could face a lot of discrimination from that.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kyeruhh's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

I thought this was fun! It wasn’t too deep, but the MCs were good and Tessa Dare continues to be the queen of HR banter. At times it did feel a bit OTT ridiculous, but who doesn’t love LARPing??

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kiala's review

Go to review page

adventurous funny lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rafacolog's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mollyjeannette's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

indieandajean's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Here we are folks, another great bodice ripper (literally in this one, in case you need that for some sort of reading challenge bingo board). I love Tessa Dare's ability to add just enough of an interesting plot to keep my attention and this book certainly has very similar vibes to much of her other work. It reminded me very much of The Duchess deal, but I found the characters here more likeable. The plot was fun, the spice level was more than adequate, and overall I found it to be a fun light read.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

storyphile's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny hopeful lighthearted relaxing fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

spuki's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

eclectic_hellscape's review

Go to review page

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

hrtlss_grl's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings