Scan barcode
jodielk93's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Gore, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Alcoholism, Torture, Violence, and Alcohol
Minor: Ableism
louiepotterbook's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
0.5
Graphic: Body horror, Cursing, Death, Emotional abuse, Gore, Homophobia, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Rape, Self harm, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicide, Torture, Violence, Blood, Vomit, Cannibalism, Suicide attempt, Murder, Lesbophobia, Gaslighting, and Alcohol
the_books_music_life's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.25
I picked this up on a whim because the synopsis sounded intriguing and like something I might enjoy.
I didn't. I really didn't.
I have a lot of issues with this book and not a lot of good things to say. I'm not even really sure why I didn't DNF it to be completely honest.
This book was a ride to say the least and not a good smooth ride, more like a bumpy, traffic filled ride from hell.
Hell House is very scientific, almost to the point of annoyance and over explaining. The book is told through four different points of view but it never differentiated between whose point of view you were reading, and so when it would switch suddenly you were left confused. All of the characters are unreliable and you never really know what's going on.
There were certain scene I read and was just dumbfounded by. This book would go from being very scientific and to raunchy in the worst way possible.
The pacing was incredibly slow and fast at the same time. It felt like it dragged on and could honestly have been cut in half in my opinion. Then, other times if would feel like it everything was happening too fast and you were left 5 chapters behind.
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Cursing, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Self harm, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Violence, Blood, Suicide attempt, Murder, and Sexual harassment
Moderate: Child abuse, Homophobia, Rape, and Lesbophobia
Minor: Cannibalism
ruthypoo2's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
The action is constant and unrelenting as the group moves into the house, begins exploring the property, discussing the history of the house and outcomes of past investigations, attempting to communicate with spirits, and rationalizing the odd occurrences that start the moment they all enter the house. It's really the perfect collection of personalities for haunted house exploration: Dr. Barrett the skeptic and his wife Edith along for the ride; fully invested and spiritually open Florence; and Franklin, who warns and knows what to expect better than any of them because of his past experience being physically and mentally assaulted by the environment of Belasco House.
Although the story feels like it drags a little at times, there's actually something always happening. So many times, I was just telepathically yelling at the characters to, "GET OUT NOW!" But as you find with classic haunted house tropes, there will always be some reason why the characters can't or won't leave and rational decision-making capabilities are nowhere to be found. It was especially a treat and made that much more harrowing because this story is set in the seventies, well before cell phones and thus making it feel like the team is hopelessly alone in their quest to discover a genuine haunting and survive the quest. It's a good story and may be kind of hard to read alone.
Moderate: Sexual content, Violence, and Alcohol
_terah_hansen_'s review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Moderate: Gore, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicide, Torture, Violence, and Cannibalism
stduke's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Sexual violence and Suicide
Moderate: Death, Rape, and Sexual assault
Minor: Animal death, Violence, Lesbophobia, and Alcohol
childofmongreldogs's review against another edition
- Loveable characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
The writing was good. I love Richard Matheson's short fiction so it wasn't a problem with the actual quality of the prose itself which has me feeling a certain kind of way about this novel. I will also say that the actual storyline itself was good as well. The twists and turns kept me on the edge of my seat. This feels like the definition of a genre. The ultimate kind of haunted house story.
The way I was on edge throughout the story was next level. Not really terrifying but I think that a lot of the tension was well done. I think that Matheson was an absolutely phenomenal writer.
I just can't jive with horror novels from this era, I think. There's too much that is bad writing to me because it fundamentally misunderstands certain people. I know that that is a controversial opinion to have: I don't like this novel because it's depiction of women is bad and it's depiction of the LGBT group is bad and it's depiction of people other than white straight men is bad, but it is what it is.
There's always a lot of handwringing and excuses for it being a different time so having an indigenous man's spirit talk like a cave man, a possible lesbian be a lesbian because she was sexually molested, and have women be generally overly emotional and easy to control (among other things like in other novels) is just something we have to forgive, just a quirk of the time, instead of being seen as a legitimate problem in the writing.
Is this the worst offender of these issues? Probably not. I'm currently reading one that's even worse, really, from a fundamental level. The problem though is that being slightly better or on the lighter end of awful for the time period isn't enough for me to forgive that form of writing. I think there's a place for making things uncomfortable for the reader, but it was lazy even then to make it uncomfortable for women by simply filling the story with violent rape of the female characters.
I can see that there's some aspects of this novel that are really good and interesting. It doesn't make up for the "problematic" nature of the novel in other ways for me.
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Animal death, Biphobia, Body horror, Death, Gore, Homophobia, Incest, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicide, Torture, Violence, Blood, Murder, Lesbophobia, and Colonisation
Minor: Addiction, Adult/minor relationship, Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Gore, Homophobia, Incest, Infidelity, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Racism, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicide, Torture, Violence, Blood, Grief, Cannibalism, Suicide attempt, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Sexual harassment, Colonisation, and Injury/Injury detail
mauvesoul's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Body horror, Bullying, Chronic illness, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Emotional abuse, Gore, Infidelity, Self harm, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Terminal illness, Torture, Violence, Blood, Vomit, Grief, Religious bigotry, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Gaslighting, Sexual harassment, and Injury/Injury detail
kantestadros's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Death, Drug use, Gore, Rape, Sexual assault, Suicide, Violence, Cannibalism, Murder, Gaslighting, and Sexual harassment
zeynothekivircik's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Biphobia, Body horror, Death, Gore, Homophobia, Mental illness, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Rape, Self harm, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Torture, Transphobia, Violence, Blood, Suicide attempt, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Lesbophobia, Outing, Alcohol, and Sexual harassment