Scan barcode
venkyloquist's review against another edition
4.0
The memorably vitriolic and immensely readable H.L.Mencken, once said, “Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.” While anything that is attempted to be run by a democratically elected Government has both its adversaries and advocates, one thing which the common populace neither acknowledges nor accuses the State of, is the possession of an entrepreneurial bent. In a world where innovation is attributed to ingenuity originating from run down garages and the cubby holes of lone wolf geniuses, the credit for providing a traction for these endeavours is the sole preserve of Venture Capitalists and Angel Investors. The legion of examples cited by publications of repute and news channels of worth extolling the virtues of Venture Capitalists has almost transformed into proselytization.
In her extremely provocative and insightful book, “The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public Vs Private Sector Myths” (“The Book”), Mariana Mazzucato (“the author”) makes a refreshing attempt to set the facts right and give the State its fair share of the credit in so far as pioneering innovation is concerned. Her theme for the book is laid down by a strong quote, courtesy Paul Berg, the 1980 Nobel Prize Winner in Chemistry. Berg asks, “Where were you guys [venture capitalists] in the ‘50s and ‘60s when all the funding had to be done in the basic science? Most of the discoveries that have fuelled [the industry] were created back then.” Primarily written in the context of the USA & UK 'country contexts', this book is nonetheless relevant across geographies and where States are equally involved in paving the paths for innovations.
The author argues that the typical image of lethargy, insipidity and regulatory obsession that is layered upon a State does it no justice. Arguing that some of the most seminal innovations in fact have been conceptualized/ideated and driven by the State she proceeds to list some of the path breaking achievements that have seen the light of the day due to the stellar efforts expended by the state. “The progenitor of the Internet was ARPANET, a program funded in the 1960s by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA”), which is part of the Defense Department. The Global Positioning System (“GPS”) began as a 1970s US military program called NAVSTAR……many of the promising new drugs trace their origin to the research done by the taxpayer funded National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), which has some annual budget of some $30 billion.”
However, the strongest argument for the State’s role in innovation is the preserve of one of the lengthiest Chapters in the book. Imaginatively titled, “The State Behind The iPhone”, the author vigorously contends that “Apple was able to ride the wave of massive State investments in the ‘revolutionary’ technologies that underpinned the iPhone and iPad: internet, GPS, touch screen displays and communication technologies. Without these publicly funded technologies, there would have been no wave to foolishly surf.” The author also argues that in spite of contributing so much to the development of the iPhone and a whole horde of other products in the Apple stable that have now attained iconic success, the State has been rewarded or unrewarded, unfairly. While shareholders walk off with $453 billion worth of market capitalization. The sophisticated major components embedded within the Apple products are mainly procured from foreign manufacturers in South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, while the final assembly is contracted out to the company Foxconn in China. In 2011, Apple’s top 9 executives earned $441 Million, the equivalent of the annual earnings of 95,000 Foxconn assembly workers. Apple continues to institute complex corporate structures that primarily aid and assist in the evasion of taxes. This according to the author is a brazen dichotomy between socialization of risks and privatization of rewards.
The Government, as per the author is also unfairly accused of not having the ability to ‘pick winners’. A classic case in point is the much touted and lamented about example of the bankruptcy of Solyndra. Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the brainchild of the Obama Administration, Solyndra received a $535 million U.S. Energy Department loan guarantee. Solyndra designed, manufactured, and sold solar photovoltaic (PV) systems composed of panels and mounting hardware for large, low-slope commercial rooftops. The panels perform optimally when mounted horizontally and packed closely together, the company claimed, covering significantly more of the typically available roof area and producing more electricity per rooftop on an annual basis than a conventional panel installation. Within two years of all the fanfare and flamboyance, Solyndra had filed for bankruptcy. The State was panned in various academic, business and political circles for not possessing the acuity to back the proper horse. While the successes of the State go unnoticed the failures become a scarring testimony to their inabilities.
The author also underscores the primacy of the entrepreneurial state in incubating major new industries which are stepping stones to the urgently required transition to a low carbon, sustainable economy. She demonstrates how state investment in basic research becomes fundamental to the development of wind and solar power technologies for commercial applications Germany and China are well on their way towards making this endeavor a reality.
The book concludes with a set of policy recommendations for furthering a purposeful public private partnership in the overall interests of society. It needs to be mentioned that some of the measures are UK-specific prised out from the book’s original manifestation as a Demos pamphlet. Some key proposals are:
• Governments should not underinvest in R&D and human capital formation;
• Expansion and reformation of the Technology Strategy Board (now Innovate UK);
• Scrapping the patent box regime and taking a hard look at small business subsidies;
• Participation of the State in the upside of its innovation funding;
• Instituting schemes involving “Golden shares of IPR and a national innovation fund, income-contingent loans and equity; and development banks.”
Mariana Mazzucato does an exemplary work of “debunking Public Vs Private Sector Myths” (in her own words). This meticulously researched book will serve as a reliable and unbiased yardstick in evaluating the future contributions of both the Public and the Private sector in so far as path breaking innovations are concerned. At a time when government measures of any kind are vilified by ascribing to them the taint by ideologies and ‘direction-leanings’ while paradoxically the ventures of capitalistic entrepreneurship stay glorified, this book aims to demolish this ‘one directional’ sense of received wisdom.
“The Entrepreneurial State” – Relevant and Responsible that makes for Recommended Reading.
In her extremely provocative and insightful book, “The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public Vs Private Sector Myths” (“The Book”), Mariana Mazzucato (“the author”) makes a refreshing attempt to set the facts right and give the State its fair share of the credit in so far as pioneering innovation is concerned. Her theme for the book is laid down by a strong quote, courtesy Paul Berg, the 1980 Nobel Prize Winner in Chemistry. Berg asks, “Where were you guys [venture capitalists] in the ‘50s and ‘60s when all the funding had to be done in the basic science? Most of the discoveries that have fuelled [the industry] were created back then.” Primarily written in the context of the USA & UK 'country contexts', this book is nonetheless relevant across geographies and where States are equally involved in paving the paths for innovations.
The author argues that the typical image of lethargy, insipidity and regulatory obsession that is layered upon a State does it no justice. Arguing that some of the most seminal innovations in fact have been conceptualized/ideated and driven by the State she proceeds to list some of the path breaking achievements that have seen the light of the day due to the stellar efforts expended by the state. “The progenitor of the Internet was ARPANET, a program funded in the 1960s by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA”), which is part of the Defense Department. The Global Positioning System (“GPS”) began as a 1970s US military program called NAVSTAR……many of the promising new drugs trace their origin to the research done by the taxpayer funded National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), which has some annual budget of some $30 billion.”
However, the strongest argument for the State’s role in innovation is the preserve of one of the lengthiest Chapters in the book. Imaginatively titled, “The State Behind The iPhone”, the author vigorously contends that “Apple was able to ride the wave of massive State investments in the ‘revolutionary’ technologies that underpinned the iPhone and iPad: internet, GPS, touch screen displays and communication technologies. Without these publicly funded technologies, there would have been no wave to foolishly surf.” The author also argues that in spite of contributing so much to the development of the iPhone and a whole horde of other products in the Apple stable that have now attained iconic success, the State has been rewarded or unrewarded, unfairly. While shareholders walk off with $453 billion worth of market capitalization. The sophisticated major components embedded within the Apple products are mainly procured from foreign manufacturers in South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, while the final assembly is contracted out to the company Foxconn in China. In 2011, Apple’s top 9 executives earned $441 Million, the equivalent of the annual earnings of 95,000 Foxconn assembly workers. Apple continues to institute complex corporate structures that primarily aid and assist in the evasion of taxes. This according to the author is a brazen dichotomy between socialization of risks and privatization of rewards.
The Government, as per the author is also unfairly accused of not having the ability to ‘pick winners’. A classic case in point is the much touted and lamented about example of the bankruptcy of Solyndra. Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the brainchild of the Obama Administration, Solyndra received a $535 million U.S. Energy Department loan guarantee. Solyndra designed, manufactured, and sold solar photovoltaic (PV) systems composed of panels and mounting hardware for large, low-slope commercial rooftops. The panels perform optimally when mounted horizontally and packed closely together, the company claimed, covering significantly more of the typically available roof area and producing more electricity per rooftop on an annual basis than a conventional panel installation. Within two years of all the fanfare and flamboyance, Solyndra had filed for bankruptcy. The State was panned in various academic, business and political circles for not possessing the acuity to back the proper horse. While the successes of the State go unnoticed the failures become a scarring testimony to their inabilities.
The author also underscores the primacy of the entrepreneurial state in incubating major new industries which are stepping stones to the urgently required transition to a low carbon, sustainable economy. She demonstrates how state investment in basic research becomes fundamental to the development of wind and solar power technologies for commercial applications Germany and China are well on their way towards making this endeavor a reality.
The book concludes with a set of policy recommendations for furthering a purposeful public private partnership in the overall interests of society. It needs to be mentioned that some of the measures are UK-specific prised out from the book’s original manifestation as a Demos pamphlet. Some key proposals are:
• Governments should not underinvest in R&D and human capital formation;
• Expansion and reformation of the Technology Strategy Board (now Innovate UK);
• Scrapping the patent box regime and taking a hard look at small business subsidies;
• Participation of the State in the upside of its innovation funding;
• Instituting schemes involving “Golden shares of IPR and a national innovation fund, income-contingent loans and equity; and development banks.”
Mariana Mazzucato does an exemplary work of “debunking Public Vs Private Sector Myths” (in her own words). This meticulously researched book will serve as a reliable and unbiased yardstick in evaluating the future contributions of both the Public and the Private sector in so far as path breaking innovations are concerned. At a time when government measures of any kind are vilified by ascribing to them the taint by ideologies and ‘direction-leanings’ while paradoxically the ventures of capitalistic entrepreneurship stay glorified, this book aims to demolish this ‘one directional’ sense of received wisdom.
“The Entrepreneurial State” – Relevant and Responsible that makes for Recommended Reading.
mirenemwb's review against another edition
4.0
Que fantasía de libro. He de reconocer que ya conocía a Mariana Mazzucato y había escuchado varías charlas suyas, además de seguirle en todas las redes sociales posibles. Me faltaba leer en primera persona sus investigaciones en el campo de la innovación.
No sólo me han parecido unas reflexiones muy inteligentes, referenciadas y totalmente justificadas, si no que también me parece que ha ido a señalar aquellos problemas que más lastran el progreso. Ahora que nadie venga a decirme a la cara que los capitalistas de riesgo, los accionistas, y principales directivos de las compañías son verdaderos temerarios. Ni que son gente creativa, innovadora y solidaria - simplemente tienen dinero.
El Estado debe participar en el crecimiento económico y, sobre todo, debe reportar beneficios de las actividades que lo promueven.
No sólo me han parecido unas reflexiones muy inteligentes, referenciadas y totalmente justificadas, si no que también me parece que ha ido a señalar aquellos problemas que más lastran el progreso. Ahora que nadie venga a decirme a la cara que los capitalistas de riesgo, los accionistas, y principales directivos de las compañías son verdaderos temerarios. Ni que son gente creativa, innovadora y solidaria - simplemente tienen dinero.
El Estado debe participar en el crecimiento económico y, sobre todo, debe reportar beneficios de las actividades que lo promueven.
carlosmartinez's review against another edition
4.0
Really enjoyed it. Mariana Mazzucato argues very convincingly that the state has a pivotal role to play in terms of directing innovation-led growth that creates high quality jobs and raises productivity. She painstakingly deconstructs the myths of the free-wheeling Silicon Valley VC-backed entrepreneur, and points out that all the key technology innovations of the 20th century had some level of state backing. Taking a close look at the iPhone, she points out that all its important component technologies - the internet, touch-screens, microprocessors, compact hard drives and so on - emerged either from government/military agencies or from state-funded university research. On this basis, she believes that economic policy should enable an enhanced role for the state in not just funding but _directing_ innovation, and receiving a fair return from that investment. Mazzucato notes that the prominent tech firms have all too readily taken up state investment and leveraged state-funded research, but have been highly reluctant when it comes to sharing the profits (or even paying their taxes).
The author notes that China's state-owned enterprises and development banks have had an unprecedented impact in terms of driving innovation and high-quality growth that benefits employees, the state and the wider public.
As we face potential climate breakdown, it's urgent these lessons are learned and that the understanding is turned into policy so that the next few decades become the era of green development.
Mazzucato's framework is limited in the sense that she assumes capitalism to be the only economic system worth talking about. Once you broaden the discussion to include socialist models of development, things get more interesting. Nonetheless, 'The Entrepreneurial State' is a valuable contribution.
The author notes that China's state-owned enterprises and development banks have had an unprecedented impact in terms of driving innovation and high-quality growth that benefits employees, the state and the wider public.
As we face potential climate breakdown, it's urgent these lessons are learned and that the understanding is turned into policy so that the next few decades become the era of green development.
Mazzucato's framework is limited in the sense that she assumes capitalism to be the only economic system worth talking about. Once you broaden the discussion to include socialist models of development, things get more interesting. Nonetheless, 'The Entrepreneurial State' is a valuable contribution.
morayfraser's review against another edition
challenging
informative
slow-paced
3.0
Dense. A shame, as the strength of the argument is lost.
catincaciornei's review
4.0
Mrs. Mazzucato's "The Entrepreneurial State" added materially to my understanding of how the world works - few reads can boast such result. The State gets hammered in PR and marketing, nevertheless it was and must continue to be the main supporter of innovation in any economy. The State is the only agent powerful (rich & stable) enough and motivated enough (long term) to support decades of expensive, risky research and development needed to find, test and market new technologies; the private sector touts its flag, pushes its own agenda and brags about its dynamism and efficiency, but it is in fact a risk-adverse short-term profit-oriented actor. Mrs. Mazzucato writes a sometimes dry economic paper, fact based, academically researched and advocated, giving examples of successful private companies piggyback riding on the State's prior silent decades of investment, research, failures and networking. Interesting, fact-full, eye opening read. Looking forward to Mrs. Mazzucato's other books.