Reviews tagging 'Gun violence'

Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood

18 reviews

egganimates's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emilianeyer's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cameron_esbenshade's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nurr's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

angorarabbit's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious reflective relaxing slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Context: I read MaddAddam around 2016, and The Year of the Flood in 2022. I normally don’t read series backwards, but there you have it. 
 
Oryx and Crake starts in such a similar place to MaddAddam that I had to go back to my copy of MaddAddam to make sure I indeed had not read Oryx ad Crake instead. I’m not sure how I would have felt about this novel if I had read the series in order, but read the way I did it was oddly comforting. Is it weird to think of a Margaret Atwood book as comforting? 
 
Anyway, this is all you can want in an Atwood book. Any science things are an extension of what was considered possible when the book was written. Human nature is human nature. The characters are in depth and believable, and are likeable and relatable despite their faults. There is the dry Atwood humour that pops up at the oddest time. Of course, it is well written with a complex but believable plot. There are shifting view points and flashbacks, though I did not find it difficult to keep track of where I was. 
 
And yes, I love the Crackers. They are a lot less creepy than The Snowman’s obsession about Oryx’s life before he met her. Or the monstrosity that Crake committed. I’ve read reviews where the writer though of the Crackers as the author’s idealised version of Indigenous people. To me they are the result of Crake’s idealised sentient species. I think by the end of the series it is obvious that Crake was delusional. Nevertheless the Crackers are funny and kind in an often cruel world. Maybe we should all be a bit more like the Crackers, without the turning blue part perhaps.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ems_bean's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jenna_justi2004's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny hopeful reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

This was the hardest book to read. It’s up there with 1984 and brave new world. Generally of worlds, I hope don’t become reality. I understand the message and it doesn’t make it any better. It’s actually so sad and essentially avoidable which is horrific. If you enjoy dystopian this is for you but this book genuinely made me sick at some points. Graphic accounts of CP and trafficking. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

violator's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mybestfriendsarefictional's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

earthtomanda's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Wow. My first full-length Atwood novel, and I am amazed at just how many aspects of humanity she is able to capture. While the plot should seem fantastical, she stays firmly in the plausible and (perhaps) the likely. Many scenes are incredibly graphic though, so tread lightly if that’s a concern — Going through the content warnings, it was hard to find something that wasn’t at least mentioned in this book.

I did struggle with how prominent discussion of sexual abuse towards children was. It was incredibly disturbing. I am still grappling with why that was a necessary inclusion — though it is Atwood, and I’m sure it was not done without some thought. Also, Jimmy can fight me.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings