Reviews tagging 'Sexual content'

Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood

53 reviews

baximus's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25

I really wanted to like this book. 

If it was written by a man I would have found it voyeuristic and grim, but I found myself forgiving the content more when I reminded myself that from a female perspective, Atwood was commenting on the toxic male psyche that is a side effect of the oversaturation of violent and sexually explicit content on the web; and the potential for radicalisation borne from apathy about the modern world. I mean a male author could have done that too but I’d have found it ickier.

Don’t take the trigger warnings lightly, some parts deal with very difficult subjects in a very matter of fact way.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

egganimates's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

divazumaya's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emilianeyer's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sujebahn's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

3.5

Very dystopian. It was my first Margaret Atwood book and I didn’t know what to expect from this book 😓

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cameron_esbenshade's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

randanopterix's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

For maximum mental torture, do what I accidentally did and happen to be listening to the Oryx’s childhood chapter while driving through a rainstorm. Extra points if you have a pathological fear of driving in rain and have been doing sort of mentally bad in recent months LOL. 

Anyways, great book, Margaret holds so many terrible worlds in her mind. Such awful and believable portents of the future. Queen of the feel-bad novel.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

angorarabbit's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious reflective relaxing slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Context: I read MaddAddam around 2016, and The Year of the Flood in 2022. I normally don’t read series backwards, but there you have it. 
 
Oryx and Crake starts in such a similar place to MaddAddam that I had to go back to my copy of MaddAddam to make sure I indeed had not read Oryx ad Crake instead. I’m not sure how I would have felt about this novel if I had read the series in order, but read the way I did it was oddly comforting. Is it weird to think of a Margaret Atwood book as comforting? 
 
Anyway, this is all you can want in an Atwood book. Any science things are an extension of what was considered possible when the book was written. Human nature is human nature. The characters are in depth and believable, and are likeable and relatable despite their faults. There is the dry Atwood humour that pops up at the oddest time. Of course, it is well written with a complex but believable plot. There are shifting view points and flashbacks, though I did not find it difficult to keep track of where I was. 
 
And yes, I love the Crackers. They are a lot less creepy than The Snowman’s obsession about Oryx’s life before he met her. Or the monstrosity that Crake committed. I’ve read reviews where the writer though of the Crackers as the author’s idealised version of Indigenous people. To me they are the result of Crake’s idealised sentient species. I think by the end of the series it is obvious that Crake was delusional. Nevertheless the Crackers are funny and kind in an often cruel world. Maybe we should all be a bit more like the Crackers, without the turning blue part perhaps.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ems_bean's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

drj's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings