Scan barcode
Reviews tagging 'Injury/Injury detail'
Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries by Heather Fawcett
147 reviews
kiwij96's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
I genuinely do not know what the plot was supposed to be: academic fantasy; romantasy; general fantasy. Because it began as a light fae academia, and slowly but surely descended into chaos by page 200. Somehow it ended up in Cruel Prince territory with absurd professions of love, an act of self mutilation, and fae royalty. Also the events of the last 100 pages were so erratic and at times out-of-character for the FMC, it didn't suit the story at all.
The events of the story happened at odd paces, with weird and vague descriptions on how conclusions were being made, and also events just being too conveniently solved. For this reason I don't thing the diary entry style of chaptering did it any favours.
This would have worked so much better as a rivals to friends type relationship in an academic setting for sure. There was no chemistry between the characters for a romance to be justified in 315 pages personally.
That said though, it was a great concept and I would probably read again (just in case it was a result of reading it out of season with this having a more winter vibe), and I liked the idea of the academic research into different fae cultures. I am hoping the sequel explores this in more depth. The worldbuilding was fantastic, the writing was mostly descriptive and was easy to read at a nice pace. Just kinda lost the plot a bit towards the end there. Could definitely have been more academic.
Graphic: Injury/Injury detail and Kidnapping
Minor: Blood, Bullying, and Self harm
bearwithhat's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Moderate: Animal death, Grief, and Ableism
Minor: Sexual assault, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
trollmila's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Ultimately really liked it and will be picking up the sequel on payday!
Graphic: Injury/Injury detail and Blood
Moderate: Alcohol and Animal death
Minor: Abandonment, Alcohol, Child abuse, and Confinement
risten's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Injury/Injury detail, Death, Blood, Murder, and Torture
Moderate: Fire/Fire injury, Violence, Kidnapping, Abandonment, Alcohol, and Emotional abuse
reclusivebookslug's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Wendell feels like a combination of Astarion from BG3 and Howl from Howl's Moving Castle (the book) in personality. He's a silly, lazy pretty boy, but also so much more than that beyond the surface. He's so fun to read, expecially in combination with Emily's more serious nature. Poe is also a favorite of mine.
A possible downside to Fawcett's writing style here is that there are not a lot of high-intensity suspenseful moments, but I actually experienced this as a good thing for the most part. Sometimes you want something more chill, and this is perfect for that. This effect I think is the result of a combination of factors including: Fawcett's writing voice, the narrator's somewhat detatched, scholarly personality, and the journal setup (which always implies a safe outcome for the protagonist and means that readers don't experience the events in the moment but after the fact with reflection). All this is not to say that the book is boring at all, it's just a different style and perspective that suits a certain reading mood but may not be everyone's cup of tea.
My only true criticism is that I prefer
Minor: Injury/Injury detail and Child abuse
sas_lk's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
This book definitely sucked me in, and I found myself wanting to pick it up whenever I was not reading. It was all in all just a solid read, and I will definitely be continuing with the series.
Graphic: Kidnapping, Injury/Injury detail, and Confinement
chellyfishing's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Moderate: Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Blood and Animal death
thefatgingerone's review against another edition
Graphic: Torture, Medical trauma, Forced institutionalization, Emotional abuse, Animal death, Abandonment, Child abuse, Injury/Injury detail, Violence, Kidnapping, Blood, and Physical abuse
meezan's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Minor: Blood, Injury/Injury detail, Kidnapping, and Cursing
teabrewer's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Murder and Kidnapping
Minor: Animal death