You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
moriahleigh's review against another edition
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Gore, Racism, Cannibalism, and Murder
Moderate: Mental illness, Toxic relationship, Violence, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis
Minor: Suicidal thoughts and Sexual harassment
clovetra's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Infidelity, Medical content, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , and Abandonment
Moderate: Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Kidnapping, Cannibalism, Stalking, Cultural appropriation, Toxic friendship, and Alcohol
Minor: Pedophilia
selendrea's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
George and Geoffrey's characterization, unfortunately, are a bit weaker. While they are successful in provoking discomfort and anger in the reader, they came across as quite over-the-top. I do wish that their dialogue and behavior were a bit more nuanced and subtle. I appreciated that Geoffrey acted as George's foil. In psychology, we have a term called ambivalent sexism, which includes hostile sexism (overt, angry, volatile) and benevolent sexism (seemingly kind but patronizing, prescribes weakness to women). These are two sides to the same coin, and are highly correlated. Kim did a fabulous job bringing both hostile and benevolent sexism to life in these characters, although I still found them to be a bit heavy handed.
My favorite aspect of this novel is that the focal point of the horror, the eyes, are not just for shock value. These scenes are disorienting and off-putting, but, in my opinion, are dripping with literary symbolism. Here are a few of my interpretations of the text:
2. George is often caught leering at women, both strangers and Ji-hyun, who is underaged. By taking out his eyes, Ji-won is stripping him from his ability to make these women feel objectified with his eyes.
3. Eyes are mentioned or referred to in other ways. One that non-Korean speakers may have missed is when Kim describes Ji-hyun's " 눈치 " (nunchi), which refers to her ability to understand and interpret people. It literally translates to "eye-measure", with "눈" meaning "eye".
4. Ji-won describes her Appa early on as being treated like a king, as is common in Korean families due to strong hierarchy systems. When she first meets George waiting in the Chinese restaurant, she describe him like a king alone on a throne. This foreshadows how much her Umma later treats him as a king despite his... undesirable behavior.
5. Ji-won's primary advantage as a serial killer is her tendency to be underestimated. Kim emphasizes the stereotype that Asian women are weak and demure. She also mentions the oleander bush, which is beautiful yet poisonous, much like Ji-won grows to be. Her descent into madness is in direct contrast to what everyone, especially George, expects her to become.
6. For a minute, the reader may expect the removal of the tumor to cease her insatiable hunger for eyes, but we are quickly corrected when Ji-won's behavior doesn't stop. To me, this represents the fact that her 팔자 (palja) is inescapable.
The Eyes Are the Best Part accomplishes so much in a short, fast-paced novel, and I enjoyed every second of it. The end is so satisfying, and I almost had a hard time closing the book for good. If you like strange, gory horror with a feminist twist, please read it as soon as possible!
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Cannibalism, Murder, and Sexual harassment
Moderate: Suicidal thoughts and Grief
uhleeshuh's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Body horror, Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Blood, Cannibalism, Murder, and Toxic friendship
bookingwithjanelle's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Mental illness and Murder
Moderate: Toxic relationship, Stalking, and Gaslighting
Minor: Racism
irenemarie's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Body horror, Gore, Misogyny, Racism, Toxic relationship, Violence, Grief, Cannibalism, Murder, and Abandonment
Moderate: Infidelity, Blood, Gaslighting, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Drug use, Vomit, and Alcohol
economydreams's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Body horror, Cursing, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Cannibalism, Medical trauma, Stalking, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Alcohol
ekgraham's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Body horror, Gore, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Violence, Cannibalism, Stalking, Murder, Abandonment, and Sexual harassment
Minor: Pedophilia, Vomit, Medical content, and Injury/Injury detail
finnyboy's review against another edition
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Body horror and Cannibalism
Moderate: Racism, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Stalking, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis
erica_reads_things's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Grief, Cannibalism, Murder, Toxic friendship, Abandonment, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Infidelity, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, and Cultural appropriation
Minor: Suicidal thoughts and Death of parent